hashtag4
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2016
- Posts
- 1,752
Russia on the policy change set out in the annual defence policy bill signed into law by US President Barack Obama last week (Washington's decision to supply weapons, including portable air defense missile systems, to militants in Syria):
US defense bill 'directly threatens' security of Russian military in Syria – Russian FM spokesperson
https://www.rt.com/news/371969-us-defense-act-russia/
Moscow views the decision as "hostile," the outgoing Obama administration "appears... to create problems for the incoming Trump administration and complicate its relations on the international stage, as well as to force it to adopt an anti-Russia policy."
"Instead of joining forces to cut short the sway of all forms of extremism there, as we suggested long ago, Washington has decided to deliver military assistance to anti-government groups, which are not much different from the terrorist cutthroats," Zakharova said.
By introducing its new Act, Washington "is bound to see" that its weapons provided for the so-called "moderate opposition" will "soon find their way to the jihadists" from Al-Nusra Front, which is an offshoot of Al-Qaeda, Moscow warned.
"This can only be described as sponsoring terrorism,"
US move to ease arms sales to rebels 'a hostile act'
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/12/russia-move-arm-syrian-rebels-hostile-161227132336441.html
"Throughout the Syrian civil war, the US has funded several Syrian rebel groups and provided them with logistical support as well as weapons.
Russia, on the other hand, launched a campaign of air strikes last year in support of its ally Assad and his government forces to battle the Syrian opposition groups, some of which are supported by the US.
Zakharova accused the Obama administration of trying to "put a mine" under the incoming administration of Donald Trump by attempting to get it to continue what she called the "anti-Russian line" of the US.
She said that the policy change set out in the annual defence policy bill signed into law by US President Barack Obama last week, would lead to weapons ending up "in the hands of jihadists with whom the sham 'moderate' opposition have long acted jointly".
.
US defense bill 'directly threatens' security of Russian military in Syria – Russian FM spokesperson
https://www.rt.com/news/371969-us-defense-act-russia/
Moscow views the decision as "hostile," the outgoing Obama administration "appears... to create problems for the incoming Trump administration and complicate its relations on the international stage, as well as to force it to adopt an anti-Russia policy."
"Instead of joining forces to cut short the sway of all forms of extremism there, as we suggested long ago, Washington has decided to deliver military assistance to anti-government groups, which are not much different from the terrorist cutthroats," Zakharova said.
By introducing its new Act, Washington "is bound to see" that its weapons provided for the so-called "moderate opposition" will "soon find their way to the jihadists" from Al-Nusra Front, which is an offshoot of Al-Qaeda, Moscow warned.
"This can only be described as sponsoring terrorism,"
US move to ease arms sales to rebels 'a hostile act'
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/12/russia-move-arm-syrian-rebels-hostile-161227132336441.html
"Throughout the Syrian civil war, the US has funded several Syrian rebel groups and provided them with logistical support as well as weapons.
Russia, on the other hand, launched a campaign of air strikes last year in support of its ally Assad and his government forces to battle the Syrian opposition groups, some of which are supported by the US.
Zakharova accused the Obama administration of trying to "put a mine" under the incoming administration of Donald Trump by attempting to get it to continue what she called the "anti-Russian line" of the US.
She said that the policy change set out in the annual defence policy bill signed into law by US President Barack Obama last week, would lead to weapons ending up "in the hands of jihadists with whom the sham 'moderate' opposition have long acted jointly".
.
