Romance vs. Raunch

bashfull

raunchy romantic
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Posts
10,353
Is it possible for a man to be both a gentleman and the "bad boy" that women want him to be? Can there coexist romance and ruanch?
 
Yes, yes,yes yes and again YES!


My husband is a gentleman, kind, caring loving and considerate but he can be the raunchiest, dirtiest downright sex animal I know!
 
Of course it's possible, but there are problems to be dealt with.

First, some women (well, some people) have personal issues, and feel that they don't deserve to be happy. Therefore, if they find someone who truly treats them well, they will often push that person away. Conversely, when they find someone who treats them like shit, they will often cling to that person.

Also, if you are trying too hard to be what she wants you to be, then you lose some of being yourself.
 
bashfull said:
Is it possible for a man to be both a gentleman and the "bad boy" that women want him to be? Can there coexist romance and ruanch?

YEP! :D

Seperate them if it makes you more comfortable.
Maybe keep the raunch on the phone
and in the bedroom only.
~smiles~

:rose:
 
Oh most definitely.

It's a lot like a man wanting a woman who is a lady during the day and a freak in the bedroom. The best of both worlds, I think. :)
 
Re: Re: Romance vs. Raunch

Arden said:
YEP! :D

Seperate them if it makes you more comfortable.
Maybe keep the raunch on the phone
and in the bedroom only.
~smiles~

:rose:

Interesting perspectives, here. I refuse to forgo the romance. However, there are few that I would truly romance. But when I do, I find that the romance, to them, is but a game.
 
Re: Re: Re: Romance vs. Raunch

bashfull said:
Interesting perspectives, here. I refuse to forgo the romance. However, there are few that I would truly romance. But when I do, I find that the romance, to them, is but a game.

Well I tried to post this earlier then Lit went wacko.

As one that yearns for even the slightest bit of romance from her husband but never gets it, I cannot imagine there would be women that would treat it as a game.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Romance vs. Raunch

Curious_Fem said:
Well I tried to post this earlier then Lit went wacko.

As one that yearns for even the slightest bit of romance from her husband but never gets it, I cannot imagine there would be women that would treat it as a game.



I think that romance and raunch each have there own time and place. I like both personally. (Although have had more raunch than romance and would like to see the other side).
 
Re: Re: Re: Romance vs. Raunch

bashfull said:
Interesting perspectives, here. I refuse to forgo the romance. However, there are few that I would truly romance. But when I do, I find that the romance, to them, is but a game.

I truly believe that you can be both. I see romantic as a way you are......something that comes naturally out of caring for another, and wanting to make them feel special. I see raunch as a way to act in an appropriate setting, that turns you both on.....but they do not have to exclusive of each other.

If someone treats romance, and true caring, as a game.....then maybe you made a bad judgement initially in giving them that romance. In giving of yourself. Just my $0.02
 
off the subject

Rosylady~how do you get pics displayed in your posts? Does it have to be a link or can I copy and paste from my harddrive?
 
Re: off the subject

bashfull said:
Rosylady~how do you get pics displayed in your posts? Does it have to be a link or can I copy and paste from my harddrive?

I believe mine are links. I had a friend give my girl to me. I'm new to putting stuff in there, but you can copy and paste too. What would you like in there?
 
Re: Re: off the subject

Unregistered said:
I believe mine are links. I had a friend give my girl to me. I'm new to putting stuff in there, but you can copy and paste too. What would you like in there?

ooooops that is my reply.
 
Re: Re: Re: off the subject

rosylady said:
ooooops that is my reply.

just attempting to include with post a picture that

edited: didn't work.

just to see if it works. :p:confused:
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Re: Re: off the subject

bashfull said:
just attempting to include with post a picture that

edited: didn't work.

just to see if it works. :p:confused:


sorry, not a person you should ask, I have a friend who helps me with stuff in my sig.


Pop back into my club tomorrow, thinking of doing a couple of perfomances. WEG
 
Why yes

I try to be both. A little more romantic in the beginning when I am trying to get a feeling for how raunchy she is. There are times to be both.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Romance vs. Raunch

Curious_Fem said:
Well I tried to post this earlier then Lit went wacko.

As one that yearns for even the slightest bit of romance from her husband but never gets it, I cannot imagine there would be women that would treat it as a game.

You would be surprised. Maybe there are those who do not recognize it? For me, romance is different than flirting. Romance is more itimate and honest. It is also special consideration and acknowledgement to the other. A shared smile. A brief glimpse. But the most important aspect, at least to me, is that it is special to only those two and honest in the endeavor. But maybe I am too whiny.
 
i agree with you bashful....but around here romance is never heard of..*sigh* guess i miss out
 
~OWLIE~ said:
i agree with you bashful....but around here romance is never heard of..*sigh* guess i miss out

I agree. You might want to check out the numerous posts posted just this afternoon. I believe them to be in the "bitch" thread.
 
bashfull said:
Is it possible for a man to be both a gentleman and the "bad boy" that women want him to be? Can there coexist romance and ruanch?

Yes...they totally can...I am with someone now who is sooooooooo romantic...but at the same time can talk dirty and be as "bad" as I like him to be (and thats A LOT). He seems to know exactly what I need, when I need it...whether Im craving to be made love to or to be fucked senseless....and both of these two "types" can go back and forth. I love it!

(Hi bashfull...Nice to meet you! :kiss: )
 
I think the two can coexist in harmony. Feeling each other out, understanding the moods, knowing the time for each is the important part for me. If he is a romantic at heart, even things that might fall into the raunchy category at times can make my heart soar. Sometimes, its the intent behind the "raunch" that makes it one or the other, or both.
They don't have to be mutually exclusive.
K..it's late, that was rambling, just some thougts.
 
romance is essential, raunch mixed in is great, but romance is the more important of the two, a mix is best.
 
what is it about society that women seem entitled to expect it all in a guy, but guys have to chose?
 
sirhugs said:
what is it about society that women seem entitled to expect it all in a guy, but guys have to chose?

And just what is it you have to choose from? If you mean having to choose between us being romantic or raunchy, well then that goes both ways. With both genders, there are actually people out there that are romantic AND raunchy and also some that are one or the other. From what I see is that more often than not, the ones that know how to be both end up with someone that only knows how to be one or the other.

But when 2 come together that do know how to be both, then you get fireworks. Unfortunately, I think this is very rare.
 
Back
Top