Romance novels

pecksniff

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
22,077
I have found that your basic genre-fiction, extruded-book-product romance novels have some common characteristics.

A romance novel is the story of two people, the lovers, and the reader always knows who they are in the first few pages. All other characters are supporting cast.

The end is never in doubt -- some obstacles must be placed in the path of true love to make the story interesting, but the lovers will end up together, either married or in a committed relationship on the way to marriage. To end the story any other way would be as unthinkable as ending a mystery novel without revealing whodunit.

The love-triangle theme is never exploited. For the sake of plot complication either lover might have an ex, or somebody pursuing him/her, but such is never a serious rival. (After all, if both Bob and Charles are pursuing Alice, and each is presented is a serious prospect, then at some point the writer will have to disappoint half her readers.)

Both lovers must be sympathetic characters. The male might be a "bad boy," but only within certain limits. He can't be the kind of bad boy who abuses women, abuses substances, or leeches off of others. If a criminal, he can only be the more romantic, old-fashioned sort of criminal, such as a pirate or highwayman.

The male might be a womanizer, but only of a rare sort, probably not found in real life -- a very chivalrous womanizer; one of whom no woman can honestly say a bad word. In fact, many of these stories seem to be written on the assumption that it is every woman's fantasy (and these books do appear to be written mostly for women) to snag a man of broad sexual experience, and get the benefit of it all to herself -- to the be the first woman he ever met who could command his entire attention and devotion.

Double standard applies. The female need not be a virgin, but she is never what you might call a slut.

The male must be a capable man -- generally, this means capable of making money or winning fights. He must be at least intelligent enough for that. But no intellectuals need apply. The hero might be well-read, capable of reciting poetry -- but a man who spends a lot of time thinking, who cares about the things intellectuals do, or who ever has any kind of serious existential crisis belongs in a completely different kind of book.

Have you seen any others?
 
Last edited:
All of the above applies only to male-female romance. I know there are gay and lesbian romance novels, but I've never read any. The conventions and tropes might be different.
 
im digging the earthy realism of early russian romantics.
1647895521827.png
 
Unless you’re a lesbian. Lesbian romance=death
Oh I dunno - the Price of Salt/Carol ends well. I'd recommend it :)

I'd agree with the OP that they are formulaic, but when we reach for chocolate we're often doing it for comfort and we know what to expect. Nothing wrong with happy endings when there's so much shit in the real world
 
Is that how a lesbian romance novel ends?!
Typically a lesbian story ends with her realising her mistake and marrying a Christian, suffering humiliation and becoming an outcast, or death. Sometimes all three.
 
Typically a lesbian story ends with her realising her mistake and marrying a Christian, suffering humiliation and becoming an outcast, or death. Sometimes all three.
much like the hit movie 'the sound of music' are you suggesting it had a hidden message?
 
Romance Novel Tropes offers some interesting insights into cultural change over time. For instance:

  • Attempted Rape: The hero will save the heroine from a would-be rapist as part of a Rescue Romance. Some unfortunate heroines have this happen more than once. Tends to be less common these days as it can be seen as trivializing or downplaying the effects of sexual violence.
  • Faux Action Girl: Less common nowadays, but some works tend to have heroines who are either blatantly lying or in deep denial when they insist they can "take care of themselves", or suddenly become incompetent and helpless whenever the plot needs the hero to intervene.
  • Hunk: The hero will often be depicted as very buff, chiseled and manly, frequently showing this off with Shirtless Scenes. However, from around the 1990's onwards, Pretty Boys became more in vogue, though hunks do still show up.
  • "Not If They Enjoyed It" Rationalization: The hero is very forceful with the heroine when it comes to intimacy, but she secretly wants to be with him anyway, so it isn't presented as problematic in-universe. More common in works published prior to the 1980's, due to shifting attitudes around women and sex (namely that it's now widely viewed as A-okay for a woman to initiate and/or actively seek out consensual sex); it occasionally creeps into more recent works, but is now viewed as being a lot more problematic due to the lack of consent and perceived romanticization of sexual assault.
 
Romance and porn are equally formulaic, but writing a novel is less hazardous than fucking junkies and living in SoCal.
 
The male might be a womanizer, but only of a rare sort, probably not found in real life -- a very chivalrous womanizer; one of whom no woman can honestly say a bad word. In fact, many of these stories seem to be written on the assumption that it is every woman's fantasy (and these books do appear to be written mostly for women) to snag a man of broad sexual experience, and get the benefit of it all to herself -- to the be the first woman he ever met who could command his entire attention and devotion.

The male must be a capable man -- generally, this means capable of making money or winning fights. He must be at least intelligent enough for that. But no intellectuals need apply. The hero might be well-read, capable of reciting poetry -- but a man who spends a lot of time thinking, who cares about the things intellectuals do, or who ever has any kind of serious existential crisis belongs in a completely different kind of book.
Turning a womanizer into a one woman man is almost as unlikely as turning a homosexual into a heterosexual. Womanizers get married from time to time, but their wives share them with other women.

Women's historical romances are usually variations of the Cinderella story: a poor but virtuous young lady is discovered by a handsome prince, who marries her. Actually, she can be poor, but she cannot be a scullery maid. The lowest she can be is shabby genteel. Maybe her father was a major in the British Army who was killed in the Napoleonic Wars, or something like that. Her economic circumstances are desperate, but she is intelligent, well educated, and cultivated. All she needs is a rich husband, and she can hold her own with women who have been rich all their lives.

If you want to write a historical romance from a man's standpoint, this does not quite work in reverse: a poor but virtuous young man cannot be discovered by a rich woman, unless he proves himself, usually thorough violence on the side of right.
 
Of course, we're not talking at all about the kind of thing Jane Austen wrote, although those novels are all about women finding husbands.
 
Typically a lesbian story ends with her realising her mistake and marrying a Christian, suffering humiliation and becoming an outcast, or death. Sometimes all three.

Lesbians meet, fuck, really love each other. Get married. Wife dies and it’s not even a big deal. Barely a mention, and book doesn’t even explain how. Widow walks off into the sunset. Cue violin music.

Lesbian romance AKA Almost Guaranteed This Is A Boring Horrible Death Novel.
 
Lesbians meet, fuck, really love each other. Get married. Wife dies and it’s not even a big deal. Barely a mention, and book doesn’t even explain how. Widow walks off into the sunset. Cue violin music.

Lesbian romance AKA Almost Guaranteed This Is A Boring Horrible Death Novel.
Why is that?
 

I only like the ones where one of them dies.

Sincerely,

Miss Havisham
Exactly. There's nothing so pleasant as a good wake and you get to wear black which can be so becoming. Less so these days - people seem to simply brush off their work clothes to attend and only footballers wear black armbands.

Romance implies a good few pages of weepiness, then LoveHoney makes a delivery and Sunday service can be accompanied by a faint buzzing. Look for the most serene face - it'll be her.
 
Back
Top