Rise of ISIS in Afghanistan is threat to Russia

hashtag45

badass 2nd rate Litizen
Joined
May 9, 2015
Posts
9,307
Rise of ISIS in Afghanistan is threat to Russia - US role

........
 
Last edited:
I'll give you an analogy that libs.might understand: peaceful muslim… .ISIS.
- Peaceful muslim : that was me, in the beginning, before my unforgivable mistake of standing up for a couple of noobs. Event that snowballed into me being trolled -in a relentless manner- by several progressives.
- Now: I'm resentful and quick to attack if I feel slighted. You progressives created me, I'm the porn board equivalent of ISIS.



http://67.media.tumblr.com/15c310e77c37f42a887fe106d86829c5/tumblr_ncbw8fLGeK1s4l4dqo1_500.png
 
JimmieJohnson said:
Hashafrass, you prolly wanna stick close to me, cause then you only hafta say you wuz laughing along with a racist piece of shit, and not being one.


http://40.media.tumblr.com/d8ea40008da3fa927ed463b35f3484b5/tumblr_n1osar33s01re0c97o1_500.jpg


HASHDRAG said:
Oh thank You James... lol can I call You James. :rolleyes:
All these genius progressives can't get it through their heads that I like you because you clearly compleeted a level of education higher than high school, like my expensive degrees, and aren't obsexed with anuses.

Hai... I'have even scolded you for saying ni***r, so I'am good and clearly not a racist.
As a woman, I wish these Blurt Bitches and RobDownSouth would figure it out. :rolleyes:

Doesn't matter as I'am off the thread anyways, before 86 shows up and I start thinking about his middle aged penis and fvcking him again. :rolleyes:

Now I have To admitt that I have no idea what my original post is about, and have no opinion, but I look forward to the replies of You and other pisters I think highly of.
At least until I'am able to find something with some of the same words in, that I can copy and payst. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

/////
 
Not bad, except for the illustration in panel #4. DO NOT place your hands on a female Muslim. Especially if your are a male. Big cultural no-no. They're not big huggers over there. :rolleyes:
The artist is from Paris. I think they hug plenty in France.
 
.My take on the article is that it points to the fact that US intervention made a mess out of that country, which also explains the rise of ISIS there (countries in state of anarchy are the perfect target for ISIS infiltrators, and discontent with having one's country destroyed by the West often breeds radical attitudes).

What condition was the country in when Russia left it prior to Western intervention?
 
'ISIS' doesn't really exist. It's just a media narrative for the CIA and Pentagon to hide their paid jihadis behind and to scare a gullible American public that's terrified of their own shadow anyway.

The USA is not fighting ISIS. The USA is fighting wars against the ordinary people of the world so that its owners can steal everything worth having.

Yay America.
 
And yes these jihadis that the US is running in Afghanistan are a threat to Russia.

The US' involvement in Afghanistan has always been about Russia.

This is just basic geopolitics.
 
Thanks.
You might have to spell it out in a more concrete /less figurative manner, tho, particularly your first sentence.
. Remember that you're often dealing with an audience who takes most things literally. :cool:

ISIS is an invention of the USA. Just like the equally fake 'Al Qaeda' were.

The Al Qaeda dudes are now 'moderate rebels' in Syria with other labels.

It's all just a bunch of stories to fool the American public while their ruling class rips the world to pieces.

Americas is waging a war against the world's people/s.

The American public for the most part know nothing about it.
 
You're right. Thanks.
I googled it and this popped up. I suspect that there's other material on the net too, but I haven't searched thoroughly yet:


Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/03/us-isis-syria-iraq

"(According to ) declassified secret US intelligence report, written in August 2012 :

A year into the Syrian rebellion, the US and its allies weren’t only supporting and arming an opposition they knew to be dominated by extreme sectarian groups; they were prepared to countenance the creation of some sort of “Islamic state” – despite the “grave danger” to Iraq’s unity – as a Sunni buffer to weaken Syria.

That doesn’t mean the US created Isis, of course, though some of its Gulf allies certainly played a role in it – as the US vice-president, Joe Biden, acknowledged last year. But there was no al-Qaida in Iraq until the US and Britain invaded. And the US has certainly exploited the existence of Isis against other forces in the region as part of a wider drive to maintain western control.

But this US and western habit of playing with jihadi groups, which then come back to bite them, goes back at least to the 1980s war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, which fostered the original al-Qaida under CIA tutelage.

In reality, US and western policy in the conflagration that is now the Middle East is in the classic mould of imperial divide-and-rule. American forces bomb one set of rebels while backing another in Syria, and mount what are effectively joint military operations with Iran against Isis in Iraq while supporting Saudi Arabia’s military campaign against Iranian-backed Houthi forces in Yemen. However confused US policy may often be, a weak, partitioned Iraq and Syria fit such an approach perfectly."

That article is disinformation.
 
Well, that also explains part of the trillions dollars in deficit and the cooked books about the Pentagon budget (as revealed by the latest audit).

((Funny btw, how massmedia didn't pay much attention to such an enormous revelation about how they screwed over the American public))

The mass media is owned by capitalists.

The deficit doesn't matter.
 
Back
Top