Retards Everywhere!!!!!!!!!!

Jenny_Jackson

Psycho Bitch
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Posts
10,872
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070308/ap_on_fe_st/jackass_copycat;_ylt=Ak2uBzRarJPCdLAssJfBWHHMWM0F

Man burns genitals in 'Jackass' stunt
EAU CLAIRE, Wis. - Attempts to do a movie stunt landed one man in the hospital with burned genitals and another facing criminal charges. The men were trying to do a stunt from one of the "Jackass" movies, in which a character lights his genitals on fire.

Jared W. Anderson, 20, suffered serious burns to his hands and genitals, according to the criminal complaint. Randell D. Peterson, 43, who sprayed lighter fluid on Anderson and lit him on fire, was charged with felony battery and first-degree reckless endangerment Tuesday in Eau Claire County Court.

Witnesses told police that Anderson, who was drunk, volunteered to do the stunt Sunday after watching the movie, the complaint said.

According to the complaint:

Anderson pulled down his pants and let Peterson spray him with lighter fluid. When the fire didn't catch, Peterson sprayed more lighter fluid on Anderson, splashing some on his clothing. He tried again to light the fire, catching Anderson's genitals, hands and clothes.

Anderson ran into the bathroom, jumped into the tub and put the flames out. Other guests took him to Luther Hospital, and eventually he was treated at the Regions Hospital Burn Unit in St. Paul, Minn., for second-degree burns.

Anderson told police who were called to the hospital that he didn't want anyone to get in trouble because of the stunt.

Peterson was freed on a $2,000 signature bond. He has a hearing scheduled April 16. If convicted, he faces up to 10 years in prison.

Even I couldn't make this shit up :rolleyes:
 
Jenny_Jackson said:
No. Unfortunately, the dumb-ass lived :rolleyes:
There was a video on one of the sites I like to watch (they gather the stuff from all over the internet). It was a series of stunts by 3 or 4 kids (17-22ish). They had a very attractive girl who they took turns setting on fire. She let them light her hair, her ass, her breasts, then finally her pussy. It was remarkable to watch, both because you wondered why someone that attractive would resort to letting dorks set her on fire to get attention, and because you wondered how pathetic guys were that they had a gorgeous, naked blond and all they could think of was, "Let's light her on fire!" :rolleyes:
 
Jenny_Jackson said:
No. Unfortunately, the dumb-ass lived :rolleyes:
It still might count if he can't have kids any longer. Maybe something in his genetics drove him to do it so he would father any kids as brain damaged as him?

Gosh. They were drunk :rolleyes: Who woulda thought?
 
3113 said:
It still might count if he can't have kids any longer. Maybe something in his genetics drove him to do it so he would father any kids as brain damaged as him?

Gosh. They were drunk :rolleyes: Who woulda thought?
We can only hope. I've said it before and will now say it again: Some folks are proud of being stupid.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
Geez what a "JACKASS!" I could not resist that one. The only thing crazy I ever did was call a friend of mine who worked for the fire department and told him to come and light my fire. HEHE! TTFN, take care hugs to everyone. :rose:
 
Truly a mental midget.

But Jenny - I have a problem with the term "retard".

Couldn't you call him instead a moron? A dickwad? A fucking idiot?
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
Truly a mental midget.

But Jenny - I have a problem with the term "retard".

Couldn't you call him instead a moron? A dickwad? A fucking idiot?

Oh you! don't like retard and then use midget, moron and idiot in the same post. Consistancy is all we ask. (Godot)
 
A 43 year old? The story didn't give their blood alcohol content. Shoddy reporting.
 
gauchecritic said:
Oh you! don't like retard and then use midget, moron and idiot in the same post. Consistancy is all we ask. (Godot)

Are there any labels that someone doesn't find offensive? Seriously. Communication is fraught with peril. Attempt at your own risk.
 
impressive said:
Yes. We should all just fuck instead. Simpler that way. *nods*

I agree, but the guy who was burned may not do much of that for a while. :confused:

Of course, his tongue is probably still okay. :p
 
Boxlicker101 said:
I agree, but the guy who was burned may not do much of that for a while. :confused:

Of course, his tongue is probably still okay. :p

This is assuming he has any idea what to do with it. ;)
 
S-Des said:
There was a video on one of the sites I like to watch (they gather the stuff from all over the internet). It was a series of stunts by 3 or 4 kids (17-22ish). They had a very attractive girl who they took turns setting on fire. She let them light her hair, her ass, her breasts, then finally her pussy. It was remarkable to watch, both because you wondered why someone that attractive would resort to letting dorks set her on fire to get attention, and because you wondered how pathetic guys were that they had a gorgeous, naked blond and all they could think of was, "Let's light her on fire!" :rolleyes:
Maybe they thought that's how you get a girl 'hot', eh? Sort of foreplay for fuckwits?
 
ElSol: I see retards.
Malcolm Crowe: In your dreams?
[ElSol shakes head.]
Malcolm Crowe: While you're awake?
[ElSol nods]
Malcolm Crowe: Retards like, in the little buses? In hospitals?
ElSol: Walking around like regular people. They don't see each other. They only see what they want to see. They don't know they're retards.
Malcolm Crowe: How often do you see them?
ElSol: All the time. They're everywhere.
 
Back
Top