SmokingFap
Former Stud
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2022
- Posts
- 8,476
Leaving the Republicans with just a one-vote majority?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I sometimes wonder if idiots like Chuck Kirk know that his twits are public and we can all see them.Charlie Kirk rides in with a brilliant take.... It's the Democrats' fault! Of course!
Hey Charlie, you oughta hang with some of the righties from this forum.... You'll get along well. May e invite Dribs as well
Translation: He told MAGA to fuck right off.Sounds like a man with a good conscience. The timing of his leaving is a truly unique way of saying to diminish the already disfunctional group.
Charlie Kirk rides in with a brilliant take.... It's the Democrats' fault! Of course!
Hey Charlie, you oughta hang with some of the righties from this forum.... You'll get along well. May e invite Dribs as well
This has been an op from Day One, they have sliced the GOP advantage by any means available.
awww look who's venting against women again....Democrats never retire, never quit, never surrender...
Take Nancy, for example.
How soon we forget, our Founders thought/believed that public service was something to be entered into for the good of the community weal and after serving briefly, the citizen would return to private life. Somehow, it became a vocation, a vocation for the ambitious, ruthless, and unscrupulous lusters for power, just for its own sake. They become the Founder's bane, a permanent semi-royal class of entitled, rules for thee, but not for me.
Take Hillary, for example.
Democrats never retire, never quit, never surrender...
Take Nancy, for example.
How soon we forget, our Founders thought/believed that public service was something to be entered into for the good of the community weal and after serving briefly, the citizen would return to private life. Somehow, it became a vocation, a vocation for the ambitious, ruthless, and unscrupulous lusters for power, just for its own sake. They become the Founder's bane, a permanent semi-royal class of entitled, rules for thee, but not for me.
Take Hillary, for example.
Got that in one of your classic email forwards?
We "forgot" that because it's not true. There's a reason why the Constitution made no provisions for term limits on any office. Besides, the founders really weren't all that concerned about the common good, which is why they thought only white male landowners should get a vote (and even then, they invented the Electoral College to second-guess voters if they made the wrong choice).How soon we forget, our Founders thought/believed that public service was something to be entered into for the good of the community weal and after serving briefly, the citizen would return to private life.
No reason why anyone should have been surprised at that, including the founders.Somehow, it became a vocation, a vocation for the ambitious, ruthless, and unscrupulous lusters for power, just for its own sake.
Keep in mind that many of the founders were slave owners, if you want to talk about "rules for thee, not for me".They become the Founder's bane, a permanent semi-royal class of entitled, rules for thee, but not for me.
Hillary who served only one full term in the Senate?Take Hillary, for example.
Democrats never retire, never quit, never surrender...
Take Nancy, for example.
How soon we forget, our Founders thought/believed that public service was something to be entered into for the good of the community weal and after serving briefly, the citizen would return to private life. Somehow, it became a vocation, a vocation for the ambitious, ruthless, and unscrupulous lusters for power, just for its own sake. They become the Founder's bane, a permanent semi-royal class of entitled, rules for thee, but not for me.
Take Hillary, for example.
Much better. Ritten personally by Trump, no words longer than six letters.Yeah, and it didn't take long to commence to fuck it up. CJ-SCOTUS #4. Briefly in Congress and then he got a job where he could make the rules, and he quickly discovered that legislating from the bench was way easier than all that parliamentarian bullshit. Then he became a lifer, and it's been pretty well downhill from there to here.
However, if we ever get the chance, we could right a much better constitution today based on what we (should have) learned.
Righted?Don't you mean writed?
Source.Yeah, and it didn't take long to commence to fuck it up. CJ-SCOTUS #4. Briefly in Congress and then he got a job where he could make the rules, and he quickly discovered that legislating from the bench was way easier than all that parliamentarian bullshit. Then he became a lifer, and it's been pretty well downhill from there to here.
However, if we ever get the chance, we could right a much better constitution today based on what we (should have) learned.