Republicans Demand A Special Prosecutor

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

FOX "NEWS"?


**points and laughs**

 

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

Me n NIGGERUD are BRO's

BTW, NIGGERPOONZANDI pulled a similiar shit ass post 3 posts into his LIT career

and guess who CALLED him on it and guess what he did?


IGGY'ed me

 

[koalabear]

FOX "NEWS"?


**points and laughs**

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162...should-probe-leaks/?tag=cbsnewsMainColumnArea

 

[busybody..]

SEE!BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

You fucks seriously want another Kenneth Starr digging into national security on a fishing expedition?

Yeah, didn't think so.

 

[busybody..]

We need one to look into DRESSAGE and SWEATER

and then

ROCKS and HAIRCUTS.

**Points and Laughs**......at NIGGERUD

 

[koalabear]

**Points and Laughs**......at NIGGERUD

So did I, he forgot the rolleyes, but got in his usual edit.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

You're wasting bandwidth Dizzybooby. Your racist ass is on perma-ignore.

 

[busybody..]

I dont give a shit, NIGGERUD!

Dont flatter yourself

 

[koalabear]

I dont give a shit, NIGGERUD!

Dont flatter yourself

Notice your quote of his post then his edit. Some stupid fucks do not know which tab they are on.

 

[busybody..]

You have too much time on your hands, KB

 

[koalabear]

You have too much time on your hands, KB

So you hit the wrong tab!

 

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

So you hit the wrong tab!

no dummy

I FIXED HIS POST

Sheesshhh..................

 

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

You fucks seriously want another Kenneth Starr digging into national security on a fishing expedition?

Yeah, didn't think so.

Haha!

CNN....they of the NO RATINGS, goes even forther than does NIGGERPOONZANDI


CNN op-ed: We might not be able to handle the truth on Fast & Furious, so let’s not be “nosy”









When I started reading this, I thought it was building to the argument that of course we should trust that our saintly president hasn’t done anything shady and quit bugging him with pesky document requests already. Nope. What this guy’s actually arguing is that it’s all too likely that Obama or Holder or someone in the food chain has done something shady but that they probably had a well-meaning, pro-American reason to do so, so maybe we should just kind of go easy, huh?

Two possible explanations. One: LZ Granderson is really, seriously advocating carte blanche without oversight for whichever side is in power. (He’s willing to let Oliver North slide on his Iran-Contra dealings too.) Two: LZ Granderson is basically trolling his own site for traffic. In that case, here you go, buddy. Here’s your link.


Heads should roll because of the Fast and Furious debacle. We don’t need every detail of that operation to be made public in order for that to happen…

Project Wide Receiver and Project Road Runner — the earlier versions of Fast and Furious under President Bush — were executed with the hope that they will do more good than harm. Hardly anyone in the public knows the finer points of these programs…

By allowing guns to infiltrate Mexico’s drug cartel, we thought we could trace them up the ladder to the leaders. Take off the head and the body dies. As for the innocent people who lost their lives? Collateral damage. That’s the uncomfortable backstory to this scandal. And there are likely other operations like it in our nation’s history that we don’t even have a clue about.

And maybe it’s better for us not to be so nosy, not to know everything because, to paraphrase the famous line from the movie “A Few Good Men,” many of us won’t be able to handle the truth.

I thought the whole point of Issa’s document request was that we don’t know for sure what the purpose of Fast & Furious was — Issa himself apparently doesn’t think it was chiefly about breaking up cartels — and that, once we find out, then we’ll have a better sense of which heads should roll. I’m actually curious: Who does Granderson want fired? Is he ready to cut Holder loose on the mere suspicion that the White House has covered something up? If so, he’s actually a step past Issa on that. Even if the White House isn’t guilty of anything, wouldn’t you want to see the documents to know how an idea as insane as gunwalking got greenlit in the first place, in case it offers some insight on how to reform the DOJ institutionally? Transparency’s pretty useful to good government. You’d think a guy who touts his award for “journalist of the year” at the top of his column would understand that.

Incidentally, White House and DOJ lawyers met today with Boehner’s aides and offered to produce 30 or so documents in return for the contempt charge against Holder being dropped. No deal. And do note: There is indeed at least one Democrat who’s planning to vote for contempt on Thursday.

 

[fair_warning]

Shouldn't you all be in bed now and leave the GB to those of us at the bottom of the world?
There should be some pay off for being at the bottom.

 

[Liar]

I'm not saying it's suspiciously convenient, but the timing of this is giving Karl Rove a chubby.

Just enough time to the election to create all kinds of spin and sow all the FUD money can buy. Not enough time for a thorough investigation to reach a conclusion before election day.

 

[RobDownSouth]

You're wasting bandwidth Dizzybooby. Your racist ass is on perma-ignore.

Busybody gets a chubby when someone says "special prosecutor". He MISSES the Clinton years, dammit.

 

[busybody..]

Stfu, niggerpoop

 

[KingOrfeo]

The term "special prosecutor" is twice-obsolete, it was replaced by "independent counsel," and the U.S. Office of the Independent Counsel was abolished in 1999 and replaced by the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel. The current Special Counsel is Patrick Fitzgerald. He would have to handle this, unless Congress passes a new law.