LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
Oh hell no, you say.
Yet reparations were paid to slave owners for their losses. No problem with that, of course.
http://sojo.net/blogs/2010/01/15/devils-reparations-haitis-debt
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ven-huge-payouts-after-abolition-8508358.html
Yet reparations were paid to slave owners for their losses. No problem with that, of course.
http://sojo.net/blogs/2010/01/15/devils-reparations-haitis-debt
This might be a reasonable time to point out that, when Haiti threw out the French, it was the latter who were on the side of evil -- first, as slave-owners (Haiti was the only modern nation created by a slave revolt). And then, when Haitians had finally attained freedom from plantation chattel slavery, France forced Haiti to pay reparations to the former slave-owners, to compensate them for their loss of "property."
You read that sentence right -- the ex-slaves were forced to pay their former masters, the equivalent of $21 billion (billion-with-a-b) in today's dollars. It took the tiny nation from 1825 to 1947 -- that's right, over a century -- to finish paying off this "debt," a crushing burden which bled away resources for education and economic development.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ven-huge-payouts-after-abolition-8508358.html
The true scale of Britain's involvement in the slave trade has been laid bare in documents revealing how the country's wealthiest families received the modern equivalent of billions of pounds in compensation after slavery was abolished.