Red Shoe Diaries

[Wicked-N-Erotic]

I've started to write a new story for which I already have ideas for follow-ups. My question is for purposes of how well it will be liked in the format that I'm writting in.
I'm writting in a way like red shoe diaries, the show on TV. Where it's a letter to someone(for those who have never heard of Red Shoes), It starts off with a greeting...
Dear Blah Blah blah,
then proceeds to tell the story of a person and their erotic encounter. I can do follow ups with this in this format easily. For once I'm writting to please someone other than myself and would love your opinions.

What are your thoughts on this style? Would you read a story written like this?

Wicked

 

[destinie21]



 

[bigandbold]

wow wicked

The story will be great , but you sure look good there , wish I had been there too

 

[Quasimodem]

Wicked-N-Erotic,

The original TV-Movie “Red Shoe Diaries” starred David Duchovny and Brigitte Bako.

“After the death of his beloved wife, a man reads her diary only to learn that she was involved in a obsessive affair with a young construction worker.”

A TV series follows where the husband [David Duchovny] advertises for people (read: women) to explain what compels them to kick over the traces and have a fling.

The original telefilm was directed by Zalman King for Republic Television [US] and followed with a made-for-video, and a television series.

As Fan Fiction it is available, just don’t expect any exposure for your stories where fannish fiction is unwelcome.

 

[MathGirl]

Wow!

Dear Quaz,
Your knowledge is positively encylopediac.
MG
Ps. I think fanfic about TVSCs is a potentially hot item.

 

[Guest]

Re: Wow!

Dear Quaz, Your knowledge is positively encylopediac. MG

I would call it encyclopediacal (as in maniacal). P.

 

[Quasimodem]

When a film buff obtains employment, which requires that he feeds his monkey, very soon he winds up with an 800 pound gorilla on his back.

BTW: Before MathGirl asks, I don't watch films in the buff.

 

[snooper]

Re: Re: Wow!

I would call it encyclopediacal (as in maniacal).

In English it is encyclopædic. But then, American English is the language that shortens the English word "now" to "currentlywise".

 

[Quasimodem]

: Wow!

Originally posted by snooper . . .American English . . . shortens the English word "now" to "currentlywise".

Sounds like one were currently bridging the potential difference between an electical generator and the ground.

 

[Svenskaflicka]

I once read a novel that only consisted of letters from one girl to her best friends. She told her about school, boys, this cool French pen pal she had just found, her first meeting with him, etc.

It was a nice book. It could have been boring, but the author of the book was very good, and managed to keep each letter interesting enough to make the reader want to continue reading.

Maybe that is some sort of Literary Voyeurism?

 

[MathGirl]

Re: Re: Re: Wow!

Originally posted by snooper In English it is encyclopædic. But then, American English is the language that shortens the English word "now" to "currentlywise".

Good grief! I intentionally use a word I just made up, and the result is a veritable deluge of etymological and semantic dystophy.

Never know what's gonna strike a chord with this bunch.
MG
Ps. Dear Quaz,
The only question I had about "buff" was if you used rare, scented ungulants while watching movies.