Question regarding two bisexual women

[gunhilltrain]

This invokes a story already being written. For any of you 3,000 people who viewed my Geek Pride entry, it's a prequel about the two bisexual woman mentioned in the story, Amanda and Lucy. (Actually, being bisexual per se is not important here.)

The prequel involves how they met and especially their first sexual encounter. In the latter, Amanda first decides to kneel down and work on Lucy's bare breasts while Lucy is standing, and then they reverse the positions, I'm assuming that a woman (or anyone for that matter) would have to be on her knees but upright to do it, not squatting down as during, say, a blowjob.

The issue I have is their differences in height: Amanda is about 5 foot 8, while Lucy is about 5'2." It would seem to be easy for Amanda to access Lucy's breasts, but would the shorter Lucy have trouble doing the reverse? Yes, it's difficult to find anything online depicting what I want to know.

 

[Purple_Fronds]

so male but for reasons I won’t go into I’ve been in this position (kneeling) and worshiping a female and I’m very tall and lining up with the breasts is possible but not easy. Obviously if she bends over it makes it possible and easier. I think the bigger issue is that it doesn’t scan on first read so it might be jarring in the story. I’m not sure the context so I could be way off base but if you had the woman who was standing, bend over and feed her breasts to the woman on her knees it sounds more plausible (and hotter). Anyway I’m off to some image searching

 

[gunhilltrain]

so male but for reasons I won’t go into I’ve been in this position (kneeling) and worshiping a female and I’m very tall and lining up with the breasts is possible but not easy. Obviously if she bends over it makes it possible and easier. I think the bigger issue is that it doesn’t scan on first read so it might be jarring in the story. I’m not sure the context so I could be way off base but if you had the woman who was standing, bend over and feed her breasts to the woman on her knees it sounds more plausible (and hotter). Anyway I’m off to some image searching

Thank you, I sort of expected that. Oddly, I never tried that exact scenario myself; maybe it never occurred to me when there are more comfortable ways to position oneself. I think it will "scan" okay, as you said, but I need to rethink it. Maybe that should both be standing on their feet and take turns bending down. Or maybe it would be best if they just sat on the bed.

 

[Rob_Royale]

Well according to a quick Google search, the average foot-to-knee length is 30% of one's total height. So 62 inches total height subtracted by 30% is 43 inches and change. The nipple height on this 5'8" dude is around 50 inches. So Lucy would need some help.

Having said that, I think you're totally overthinking this. Amanda will happily lean over a bit to give Lucy the access she desires. And any reader who's gonna grab up their slide rule and challenge your math is on the wrong website.

 

[Carnevil9]

Amanda took Lucy by the hand and led her to the stairway.

"Stand on this first step and face me," she said. "I want your breasts to be at the perfect height for my mouth."

This allows Amanda to still feel somewhat subservient, being one level lower, yet have easy hand and mouth access to the goodies. It also makes for a stark image in the mind of the reader.

I've actually done this with Mrs. Carnevil, who is quite short.

 

[gunhilltrain]

Well according to a quick Google search, the average foot-to-knee length is 30% of one's total height. So 62 inches total height subtracted by 30% is 43 inches and change. The nipple height on this 5'8" dude is around 50 inches. So Lucy would need some help.

Having said that, I think you're totally overthinking this. Amanda will happily lean over a bit to give Lucy the access she desires. And any reader who's gonna grab up their slide rule and challenge your math is on the wrong website.

I know I'm overthinking this, but it still baffled me anyway. I did have one reader challenge me on some physical detail, although the circumstances were quite different. I also had one challenge me on some geographic situation - not an outright error, but something about the nature of the place.

 

[gunhilltrain]

This allows Amanda to still feel somewhat subservient, being one level lower, yet have easy hand and mouth access to the goodies. It also makes for a stark image in the mind of the reader.

I've actually done this with Mrs. Carnevil, who is quite short.

Good try, but it's in a dorm room, so there is no stairway. At least there aren't any in any dorm I've ever seen.

 

[Brandnewbuddy]

Good try, but it's in a dorm room, so there is no stairway. At least there aren't any in any dorm I've ever seen.

OOH! have Lucy stand on some stacked textbooks. Whenever we needed a stepstool in college, we’d use those. You can even add in an additional physical element of Lucy being a bit shaky on the stacked books so Amanda also steadies her as her quivering from the pleasure mixes with her nervousness of being on a shaky pile of textbooks

 

[Purple_Fronds]

Thank you, I sort of expected that. Oddly, I never tried that exact scenario myself; maybe it never occurred to me when there are more comfortable ways to position oneself. I think it will "scan" okay, as you said, but I need to rethink it. Maybe that should both be standing on their feet and take turns bending down. Or maybe it would be best if they just sat on the bed.

Sitting on the bed sounds good and lots of examples of that.

 

[gunhilltrain]

OOH! have Lucy stand on some stacked textbooks. Whenever we needed a stepstool in college, we’d use those. You can even add in an additional physical element of Lucy being a bit shaky on the stacked books so Amanda also steadies her as her quivering from the pleasure mixes with her nervousness of being on a shaky pile of textbooks

Another good try. So you needed a step stool; for anything in particular? I couldn't help but interpret that it would something sexual. I went to a commuter school, so there were no dorms.

 

[Brandnewbuddy]

Another good try. So you needed a step stool; for anything in particular? I couldn't help but interpret that it would something sexual. I went to a commuter school, so there were no dorms.

Our dorms were small but they had high ceilings, so if you wanted to stash stuff on top of the wardrobe/dresser, or the cabinets in the kitchenette/common room (microwave and fridge room for the suite) you might need the boost. Also if you were trying to sneak over a wall somewhere on campus, you might need a boost

 

[Brandnewbuddy]

But no, don’t know of anyone who needed a stepstool to fuck….usually we just went to the laundry room

 

[gunhilltrain]

Sitting on the bed sounds good and lots of examples of that.

I started writing again about an hour ago; this will be the way to go. By the way, the Geek Pride entry was in Romance, and it had sexual descriptions but no actual depictions. (Sorry, people.) This prequel will have a slow-burn opening, but it will have explicit sex. It will be in the Lesbian category, and the title will likely be "Amanda and Lucille." Expect at east two weeks before it is submitted. I hope to get more than the 3,000 views I got on the original.

By the way, the college (it's mentioned in the first story) is the University of Maryland at College Park, just north of Washington.

 

[gunhilltrain]

But no, don’t know of anyone who needed a stepstool to fuck….usually we just went to the laundry room

Since we didn't do laundry there, we had to use one of the college newspaper offices. Nighttime, of course, was best, but a weekend during daytime could work.

It was sad when one of the landmarks of my youth was demolished in 1985. (Yeah, I'm getting old.) It was at the City College of New York, but the actual building was built in 1889 as part of a Catholic women's college. Yes, nuns and all; there are photos online. This is it, probably in the 1930's, before the city bought it.

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/9e/81/37/9e813719646a1758f9c9a34f9dc4b7d0--sacred-heart-college-of.jpg

 

[DarkSollat]

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGJQVHNBU/
Supposedly 6'1 vs 5'7

 

[gunhilltrain]

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGJQVHNBU/
Supposedly 6'1 vs 5'7

It looks like more than a five-inch height difference, but I'm not sure. I'd guess the taller one is more than 6'1. In any case, they would line up perfectly.

 

[Purple_Fronds]

I started writing again about an hour ago; this will be the way to go. By the way, the Geek Pride entry was in Romance, and it had sexual descriptions but no actual depictions. (Sorry, people.) This prequel will have a slow-burn opening, but it will have explicit sex. It will be in the Lesbian category, and the title will likely be "Amanda and Lucille." Expect at east two weeks before it is submitted. I hope to get more than the 3,000 views I got on the original.

By the way, the college (it's mentioned in the first story) is the University of Maryland at College Park, just north of Washington.

Looking forward to it

 

[gunhilltrain]

Looking forward to it

Thank you for following me. I just published an essay (today) about the upcoming Barbie movie (in Reviews and Essays) and the foot fetish mania that has resulted merely from the three trailers. I also get some pokes in about Quentin Tarantino, who directed Margot Robbie in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

 

[Purple_Fronds]

Thank you for following me. I just published an essay (today) about the upcoming Barbie movie (in Reviews and Essays) and the foot fetish mania that has resulted merely from the three trailers. I also get some pokes in about Quentin Tarantino, who directed Margot Robbie in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

Cool, i love a good fetish, also loved the once upon… movie

 

[gunhilltrain]

Cool, i love a good fetish, also loved the once upon… movie

I tend to be a bit too thorough with these things (too much time in college, I suspect), but here are some the links to the essay. Some good things in there, and that's only a few of them.

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/whats-up-with-barbies-feet-essays-and-reviews.1589666/

 

[gunhilltrain]

Looking forward to it

I knew I had promised this somewhere. This was actually published about a week ago. Anyway, the story about the two bisexual women at a college, as completed:

https://classic.literotica.com/s/amanda-and-lucille

 

[Purple_Fronds]

I knew I had promised this somewhere. This was actually published about a week ago. Anyway, the story about the two bisexual women at a college, as completed:

https://classic.literotica.com/s/amanda-and-lucille

Great story, two new words as well. I like this story as a first person narrative they were both very sweet and you captured the sentiments I think perfectly. I would say from first hand observation that these scenarios are still playing out in this time as previous decades. Also oh my god Amanda is a nerd which I love.

 

[gunhilltrain]

Great story, two new words as well. I like this story as a first person narrative they were both very sweet and you captured the sentiments I think perfectly. I would say from first hand observation that these scenarios are still playing out in this time as previous decades. Also oh my god Amanda is a nerd which I love.

Thank you. Actually, this and the previous Geek story are my first first forays into the 21st Century, 2016-2017. Usually I'm in the 1970's or 1980's (when I was young). I would say Amanda is a geek (she know a lot of stuff) but she is not a nerd (she is not shy or socially awkward). In the 2017 Geek story, she meets her first boyfriend, but she is going to keep Lucy too.

What are the two new words?

 

[Purple_Fronds]

Thank you. Actually, this and the previous Geek story are my first first forays into the 21st Century, 2016-2017. Usually I'm in the 1970's or 1980's (when I was young). I would say Amanda is a geek (she know a lot of stuff) but she is not a nerd (she is not shy or socially awkward). In the 2017 Geek story, she meets her first boyfriend, but she is going to keep Lucy too.

What are the two new words?

zaftig and dishabille. I appreciate your distinction between nerd and geek, although I meant its usage as a term of endearment I agree that the strict definition doesn’t fit.

 

[gunhilltrain]

zaftig and dishabille. I appreciate your distinction between nerd and geek, although I meant its usage as a term of endearment I agree that the strict definition doesn’t fit.

"Zaftig" I think is Yiddish, so it was used in New York a lot. Dishabille must be French, but it's not the kind of word you hear in ordinary conversations. During the Geek Pride contest, there was a lot of back and forth about the differences between geeks and nerds, although it's possible to be both I think.