Question For The Misstresses

Well, the bigger they are, the harder they fall.

:D

Seriously, I have always preferred tall men, regardless of vanilla, subbing or Domming.....
 
ok, well im a short guy and last night a girl told me she was turned on by my height

but im not looking for a girlfriend, i would like a mistress to live out my kinky fantasies with so i was just wondering if yall like short or tall guys...
 
Well, I think everyone has their preferances with or without kinky fantasies.

Short or tall
Thin or plump
Long hair or short hair.

Whatever makes you tick!
 
I'm a slave so can't answer as a Mistress, but I would think the more important factor would be the desire to submit more so than physical attributes you have no control over. There was a thread here once about whether the physical appearance was a deciding factor, and for some, including myself, it was not that important. Good luck in your search to live out your fantasies. :)

Catalina http://www.logtenberg.info/sex/18+40.gif
 
But that which first attracts you may be appearance, depending on how you met.

You, catalina, like I had the benefit of knowing our loves from the inside out in that we got to know them on line and on the phone.

:)


Then, while meeting someone without benefit of knowing them would naturally include determining if there is a physical attraction there, no, physical attributes aren't a deciding factor, but may ease the way a bit. If the physical chemistry isn't there, it isn't likely to be a relationship that will go very far.

For Tacky Daddy though, he is looking for a play mate, not a lifelong partner, so my question is....under those circumstances do we find physical attributes more likely to determine time spent together?
 
In play partners both the short and the tall male have their advantages. The short guy is easier to tie up, tower over, find female clothes for, and rest your feet on.

The tall guy is better to ride around as a horsie.

I'll take either, really, given the right attitude.
 
Sight unseen My choice would be 6' 4" plus...a longer way to drag him or her to their knees with My baby finger in the ring of the collar.

BUT it is the eyes that really capture Me...the sincerity and need to submit in the end.
 
MissTaken said:
But that which first attracts you may be appearance, depending on how you met.

You, catalina, like I had the benefit of knowing our loves from the inside out in that we got to know them on line and on the phone.

:)


Then, while meeting someone without benefit of knowing them would naturally include determining if there is a physical attraction there, no, physical attributes aren't a deciding factor, but may ease the way a bit. If the physical chemistry isn't there, it isn't likely to be a relationship that will go very far.

For Tacky Daddy though, he is looking for a play mate, not a lifelong partner, so my question is....under those circumstances do we find physical attributes more likely to determine time spent together?

Physical attributes can lead to initial attraction, but I learnt a long time ago that the mind is far more a driving force for me. I'm a little unusual I guess in that I have found both in vanilla and lifestyle, that looks are at the bottom of the list for attraction. Maybe it is also something I have learned that often the tall, dark, handsome, is not necessarily much more than that and I get bored or just turned off. I think for play only, physical attributes might be even less important. For me, men can be delicious no matter what height, shape, colour, or size...maybe it is an addiction?!! LOL.

Catalina http://www.logtenberg.info/sex/18+30.gif
 
I don't see any advantages to being a short guy except we tend to live longer I think. I don't see many tall old people.
Tall subs are attractive to me.

I did want to make the 6' club but the closest I got was 5' 11" and a half. For nilla sex, I like from 5' to 5' 6". I've also have had fantasies of spinning a little person around on my cock.
 
Back
Top