question about pics

What percentage of pics are really of the person who claims them to be him/her?

  • 0=10%

    Votes: 3 15.0%
  • 11-20%

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • 21-30%

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • 31-40%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 41-50%

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • 51-60%

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • 61-70%

    Votes: 3 15.0%
  • 71-80%

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • 81-90%

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • 91-100%

    Votes: 1 5.0%

  • Total voters
    20

jinnysub

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 15, 2001
Posts
652
Ok....one person here gets threatened with exposure in RL because she is actually posting wonderful pics of HERSELF.

Others are sceptical of a series of pics purporting to show the same person, but that person must have jumped out of bed, ran to the bathroom, colored her pubic hair, and then jumped back in bed for the next series of shots.

I'm frankly sceptical that the percentage of male appendages that are over 10" is as high as it seems to be.

I'd like to poll you as to what percentage of pics that are here (not counting avatars -- my avatar is NOT ME, not by a long shot, except in my mind) are actually of the person posting and claiming them to be him/her.
 
I'll be the first to say here, my "male appendage" is not over 10"


Sincerely and truthfully,
"Hung like a field mouse" Mor
 
I said "half"

but I really don't care, most of the time. I don't know why someone would lie to a bunch of anonymous strangers, but I like to look at pix in general (that's what got me here in the first place).
And my av is my real likeness.
And like mordin, I too am less than 10cm
 
Moridin187 said:
I'll be the first to say here, my "male appendage" is not over 10"


Sincerely and truthfully,
"Hung like a field mouse" Mor

Damn, I thought every guy on the internet had to have a minimum of 8" and be 6 foot tall, or they'd be denied access!:D :D
 
Scabbers???

10cm or 10"???

My schooling makes me recall that there is a little difference.

But...to be honest, the difference is a whole lot more in how the 10 [unspecified units of measure] are used rather than in their size, per se.
 
and there's the source of all my woes

jinnysub said:
But...to be honest, the difference is a whole lot more in how the 10 [unspecified units of measure] are used rather than in their size, per se.

but what did you expect from a rat?
thanx for the vote of confindence, dear lady
 
jinnysub said:
But...to be honest, the difference is a whole lot more in how the 10 [unspecified units of measure] are used rather than in their size, per se.

My point exactly Jinny. You can get a guy with a dick like two soda-cans taped together, and a guy with a dick 3" long, and if the first one has no idea what he's doing and the second knows every book of love by his heart. Who do you think is going to satisfy you better?
 
Oh, moridin...don't make me think about that. I'm at work, and thinking like that is damned inconvenient.
 
I've had some rough experiences with online pic. Often there are pics of the person that were taken 10 years ago. But my worst was when I received pics from a young lady in Massachusettes. One was a cute cheerleader, the other was a cute model, and the other was a sexy exotic dancer. The cheerleader was her but the other 2 were of a friend and her cousin. Turned out that she was just a 15 yr. old girl in need of attention.
 
jinnysub said:
Oh, moridin...don't make me think about that. I'm at work, and thinking like that is damned inconvenient.

Did I ever mention that I've got the Kama Sutra memorized and I've been looking for someone to try all the positions with? Interested? ;)
 
jinnysub said:
Oh, moridin...don't make me think about that. I'm at work, and thinking like that is damned inconvenient.

Hey jinny, You are right. It does make you wonder when it seems every man boasts 8-10 inches. Most of them are probably teen agers that wouldn't know what to do if they had 10 inches but are getting their kicks looking for a little pussy.

That's alright, those of us that have experience know that it's what is between the ears and not between the legs. My significant other has no complaints.:D
 
you dont get many people posting pics and claiming its them except in avatars really ?

as for the % of those pics to be true i would say its quite high because i dont think there is much lying between the regular posters on here and those are the ones that mostly use real pics for avatars
 
I'd like to poll you as to what percentage of pics that are here (not counting avatars -- my avatar is NOT ME, not by a long shot, except in my mind) are actually of the person posting and claiming them to be him/her.

Probably zero but who really cares, this is the internet. BTW my avatar is me, I'm Billy Bobs twin but don't let anyone know, we have this special thing going with Angelina
 
so who's blood

is that in the little vile, Billy Rick's or Billy Bob's? Or is it academic, since you'd be molecularly identical?
 
Three people who post or have posted here have stood in front of me IRL - so... I think it's safe to say that it's me in the pics.

My opinion is that most of us are posting real pics. Some people I know for a fact are. Some people it's pretty obvious they probably are. Some people it's pretty obvious they're liars. -shrug-
 
plasticman33 said:
Damn, I thought every guy on the internet had to have a minimum of 8" and be 6 foot tall, or they'd be denied access!:D :D
Well, I can qualify for half of that formula; I am 6'6" tall. Alas the other half is average (roughly 6"). I would gladly trade six inches of height for another six inches of length or even just two inches, but it just doesn't work that way. Not that it would really make that much of a difference - but it would be nice.

The only pic I have posted here purpoting to be me, was actually me. Since the purpose was to actually meet people in RL I don't see any advantage in putting up something that is fake - sooner or later they would know the truth anyway.

I owuld hope that what others post is not fake as I want to really know what they look like, and I am not interested in cyber only relationships.
 
Back
Top