Punkass Schumer Gets His Elitist, Socialist Ass Handed To Him On Senate Floor

[irksomesauce]

Sens. Tom Cotton and Chuck Schumer reportedly got into an angry confrontation on the Senate floor Friday over Senate Democrats delaying the confirmation of Rep. Mike Pompeo for CIA director, The Weekly Standard reports.

Cotton was reportedly irate with Schumer’s delay of the confirmation vote and loudly accosted him on the Senate floor. Schumer retorted that the Senate had never confirmed a CIA director on Inauguration Day, adding that Senate Republicans did not do the same for former President Barack Obama. He continued that Cotton would have known this if he had been in the Senate eight years ago.

“Eight years ago, I was getting my ass shot at in Afghanistan,” Cotton reportedly shot back. He continued, “So don’t talk to me about where I was 8 years ago.” Cotton served two tours in Iraq and Afghanistan in the U.S. Army as a member of the 101st Airborne Division.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/23/c...t-where-he-was-eight-years-ago/#ixzz4We3IPkBW

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

Can't wait to watch Cotton make Franken pee his pants, too. The constitutional cornholing has just begun!

 

[phrodeau]

Senator Cotton is the goon who sent that inane letter to Iran after the nuclear deal, violating the Logan Act.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Senator Cotton is the goon who sent that inane letter to Iran after the nuclear deal, violating the Logan Act.

When did you get your ass shot at by the Muzzies?

 

[FeeNicks]

Senator Cotton is the goon who sent that inane letter to Iran after the nuclear deal, violating the Logan Act.

THIS is why StrongHorse Trump won Part XX

 

[Liar]

So Schumer was right on substance, and Cotton got in a political zinger soundbite.

I'm sure they both got their fundraising emails out about it already.

 

[Conager]

So Schumer was right on substance, and Cotton got in a political zinger soundbite.

I'm sure they both got their fundraising emails out about it already.

No, he wasn't "right on substance." He's the leader the Democrats when they ask him if the nomination will proceed, they are asking for a head count. He assured them it would. When he says, "Oh I just meant I wouldn't vote against him," it is gamesmanship.

No matter, it will just give Republicans one more excuse to nuke the filibuster on the Supreme Court nominations.

I simply would have told Schumer oh well since you don't speak for all the Democrats we are going to bother talking to you at all anymore just sit there shut up and hope for the best in two years.

 

[FeeNicks]

I agree

Ignore him, talk over his head

Call him a clown, down from head clown

 

[water505]

When did you get your ass shot at by the Muzzies?

He has a PlayStation Jihad Attack game!

 

[water505]

Schumer is going to out-Reid Harry Reid.

 

[Liar]

No, he wasn't "right on substance." He's the leader the Democrats when they ask him if the nomination will proceed, they are asking for a head count. He assured them it would. When he says, "Oh I just meant I wouldn't vote against him," it is gamesmanship.

Yeah of course it is. Same ol' gamemanship. Senate slogging along at slug pace as always, and not unprecedentedly so. Which was what he pointed out.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

http://dvtfaqskbwkln.cloudfront.net/user_content/newsimages/a3b27116-c5c9-4bac-9a6f-a8662678bf56.jpeg?app=278

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No, he wasn't "right on substance." He's the leader the Democrats when they ask him if the nomination will proceed, they are asking for a head count. He assured them it would. When he says, "Oh I just meant I wouldn't vote against him," it is gamesmanship.

No matter, it will just give Republicans one more excuse to nuke the filibuster on the Supreme Court nominations.

I simply would have told Schumer oh well since you don't speak for all the Democrats we are going to bother talking to you at all anymore just sit there shut up and hope for the best in two years.

I agree!

Make them live up to their own rules. Alinsky 101.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Fuck yeah - get rid of that filibuster.

51

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Fuck yeah - get rid of that filibuster.

51

Yeah. Did you not argue that Trump is illegitimate because he lost the majority vote?

 

[FeeNicks]

Fuck yeah - get rid of that filibuster.

51

tell it to Reid

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Yeah. Did you not argue that Trump is illegitimate because he lost the majority vote?

Never did I argue such a fallacy.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Never did I argue such a fallacy.

So he's legitimate and won the election straight up.

The popular vote doesn't matter at all.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

So he's legitimate and won the election straight up.

The popular vote doesn't matter at all.

He is the sworn President because the electoral college voted him in. He won the election. That is the way it works. Don't you always spout off about what a scholar you are !?

How you get from that to "The popular vote doesn't matter at all" is why I think you are a pinhead.

 

[FeeNicks]

^^^Takes the goalposts and puts in middle of the hockey rink and shoots baskets at 3rd base

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Because for over a month now, a lot of your colleagues here are arguing what I posited, the he really didn't win the election because he lost the popular vote and because the majority did not vote for him, he is not legitimate, he does not have a mandate and he must be stopped by any method, preferably impeachment.

You cannot have missed that and I actually still think you partook in it.

 

[FeeNicks]

http://dvtfaqskbwkln.cloudfront.net/user_content/newsimages/a3b27116-c5c9-4bac-9a6f-a8662678bf56.jpeg?app=278

in case you dont know what this PIECE OF STINK meant by this pic

here it is


and its a LIE as usual

An Unfair Attack Against Tom Cotton Gets New Life

This tweet, directed at Tom Cotton, is rocketing around the Internet, with more than 18,000 retweets as of 4:00 p.m. (huge by political Twitter standards). Writer Brian Murphy responded to Senator Tom Cotton’s complaints about delays in confirming Mike Pompeo with this: What would a normal person think after reading this tweet?

That Tom Cotton intentionally hurt a dying woman just to cause Obama pain? If that’s true, then that’s unquestionably a terrible thing to do, and it is far, far worse than a short delay in Pompeo’s confirmation. So, what are the facts? It’s actually a pretty normal Washington story with a tragic twist. Murphy is apparently referring to Cassandra Butts, Obama’s nominee to be ambassador to the Bahamas. According to the New York Times’ Frank Bruni (no fan of Cotton’s) Cotton held up Butts’s nomination — along with nominations to the ambassadorships to Sweden and Norway — because of what Bruni called a “legitimate gripe.”

Cotton was “trying to pressure” Obama to take action against the Secret Service after it leaked personal information about a congressional colleague. Eventually, Cotton released his hold on the other two ambassadors. He kept the hold on Butts. Butts was a law-school classmate of Obama’s, and she said that Cotton told her that he kept the hold on her to inflict “special pain” on Obama. Cotton’s spokesperson denied he ever said any such thing and said that the senator was releasing his holds as the Secret Service investigation progressed. Tragically, however, Butts died suddenly while she was still on hold. Bruni reported that she had acute leukemia and “didn’t know it and hadn’t felt ill until just beforehand.” Delayed confirmations are nothing new in Washington.

A delayed nomination designed to inflict maximum personal pain while a person slowly dies of cancer would be new — and dreadful. Instead, a qualified nominee was caught up in a fight not of her making and died suddenly before the fight was resolved. It’s a sad story, and yes it’s a story of the “dysfunctional pettiness” that sometimes dominates Washington, but it’s not, however, a story of hate or malice, and that’s an important distinction to make.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner?page=2

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

in case you dont know what this PIECE OF STINK meant by this pic

here it is


and its a LIE as usual

An Unfair Attack Against Tom Cotton Gets New Life

This tweet, directed at Tom Cotton, is rocketing around the Internet, with more than 18,000 retweets as of 4:00 p.m. (huge by political Twitter standards). Writer Brian Murphy responded to Senator Tom Cotton’s complaints about delays in confirming Mike Pompeo with this: What would a normal person think after reading this tweet?

That Tom Cotton intentionally hurt a dying woman just to cause Obama pain? If that’s true, then that’s unquestionably a terrible thing to do, and it is far, far worse than a short delay in Pompeo’s confirmation. So, what are the facts? It’s actually a pretty normal Washington story with a tragic twist. Murphy is apparently referring to Cassandra Butts, Obama’s nominee to be ambassador to the Bahamas. According to the New York Times’ Frank Bruni (no fan of Cotton’s) Cotton held up Butts’s nomination — along with nominations to the ambassadorships to Sweden and Norway — because of what Bruni called a “legitimate gripe.”

Cotton was “trying to pressure” Obama to take action against the Secret Service after it leaked personal information about a congressional colleague. Eventually, Cotton released his hold on the other two ambassadors. He kept the hold on Butts. Butts was a law-school classmate of Obama’s, and she said that Cotton told her that he kept the hold on her to inflict “special pain” on Obama. Cotton’s spokesperson denied he ever said any such thing and said that the senator was releasing his holds as the Secret Service investigation progressed. Tragically, however, Butts died suddenly while she was still on hold. Bruni reported that she had acute leukemia and “didn’t know it and hadn’t felt ill until just beforehand.” Delayed confirmations are nothing new in Washington.

A delayed nomination designed to inflict maximum personal pain while a person slowly dies of cancer would be new — and dreadful. Instead, a qualified nominee was caught up in a fight not of her making and died suddenly before the fight was resolved. It’s a sad story, and yes it’s a story of the “dysfunctional pettiness” that sometimes dominates Washington, but it’s not, however, a story of hate or malice, and that’s an important distinction to make.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner?page=2

I'm just quoting this for the vast majority who have this maniacal Jew on ignore.