Public Decency?

I think it's quite subjective. Are we talking about actions, appearances, attire, ages...?
 
Young, slim, firm, =worthy to be nude
Old, wrinkled, fat, = obscene if nude

We are confusing esthetics with morals-- nothing unusual there, sadly.
 
Young, slim, firm, =worthy to be nude
Old, wrinkled, fat, = obscene if nude

We are confusing esthetics with morals-- nothing unusual there, sadly.

As a member of the old, wrinked and fat, I would seriously doubt the decency of letting the world see me naked. :rolleyes:
 
I'm indecent in general, so I don't think I could offer much salient insight here. If pressed, however, I'd say: Hit the pause button about going nude if your tits hang down to your pelvis or if your nuts hang down to your mid-thighs.
 
Perhaps not 'current, TV-dictated, age-phobic, silicone-tit standards of what's "pretty".

But "ugly" does not equal "immoral."

Same response to lesbiaphrodite...

Huh! Not even Peter Paul Reubens pretty, I think me. Fortunately, I have a noble soul and affidavits attesting to my big heart. :rolleyes:
 
Gawdalmighty, Bear, what I'm saying is that your right to go nude has nothing to do with your standards of beauty. Or anyone else's.
 
Gawdalmighty, Bear, what I'm saying is that your right to go nude has nothing to do with your standards of beauty. Or anyone else's.

Right? No, you are correct.

Willingness? Uh, yeah it does.





Maybe I can get a good deal on liposuction . . . :rolleyes:
 
Ummm yeah I've heard horror stories about liposuction. Not that they take out to much or anything. I've heard that after losing alot of weight, she had alot of excess skin hanging. Also something about how the doctor refused to remove it because it would shrink to fit her in a month or something. :eek:
 
I'm indecent in general, so I don't think I could offer much salient insight here. If pressed, however, I'd say: Hit the pause button about going nude if your tits hang down to your pelvis or if your nuts hang down to your mid-thighs.

Why?

A breast is still a breast, no matter what shape or size, same for any other body part. I think defining whether someone can go nude dependant on "looks" is obscene.
 
But at the last Litogether in Chicago, we were lucky to have several naturists, people completely comfortable in their nudity, as part of the attendees.

Was anyone offended by the fact a few people decided to be nekkid?[/I]
At a gathering of porn writers? :rolleyes:

;) :D :rose:
 
There have been court decisions in favor of nudity -- at the federal level as a First Amendment issue, and in New York State (allowing topless for women) as an equality issue.

Like many decisions, such as the ones repealing sodomy laws, these go beyond "consensus". Of course, it is controversial when the legal system pushes beyond consensus -- just look at the continuing furor over Roe vs Wade -- or what is happening in California with the gay marriage decision.

When we try to enforce cultural preferences through laws, we are usually making a mistake.

Unlike public nudity laws sodomy laws involved activity by consenting adults behind closed doors. We still don't allow butt-fucking in public. So the analogy doesn't really hold.
 
At a gathering of porn writers? :rolleyes:

;) :D :rose:

Ah, but you're stereotyping, here.

There were several rooms of party-goers. Different themes.

Some discussed writing, some about new rope tricks, some got into massage, some had the nekkid folks -

Writing smut doesn't necessarily mean you indulge in your story topics, yannow.
 
Ah, but you're stereotyping, here.

There were several rooms of party-goers. Different themes.

Some discussed writing, some about new rope tricks, some got into massage, some had the nekkid folks -

Writing smut doesn't necessarily mean you indulge in your story topics, yannow.

:eek: It doesn't? Awwwwwwwww . . . And I'm so fond of my story topics, too!
 
Ah, but you're stereotyping, here.

There were several rooms of party-goers. Different themes.

Some discussed writing, some about new rope tricks, some got into massage, some had the nekkid folks -

Writing smut doesn't necessarily mean you indulge in your story topics, yannow.

Granted, but as I said in my first post here, the standards for "public decency" are arbitrary and based on cultural preferences. My expectation is that the "cultural preferences" of porn writers are a bit different from those of the mainstream. To be specific, the ethic of "OK by me if it feels good and doesn't hurt anyone else" is more likely to prevail. Then you get into the question raised by other's here, which is whether the public display of gross or extremely unattractive bodies "imposes an externality" that diminishes my quiet enjoyment of the landscape. ;)
 
Okay I'm back. (Had to go to work today.)

So, let's take this a step further. We'll use public nudity as an example.

Why is it indecent to be walking nude down the street? (Hence it being illegal through the Public Indecency Laws.) I have heard many arguments against the allowance of public nudity and frankly none of them make sense to me.

Cat
 
Okay I'm back. (Had to go to work today.)

So, let's take this a step further. We'll use public nudity as an example.

Why is it indecent to be walking nude down the street? (Hence it being illegal through the Public Indecency Laws.) I have heard many arguments against the allowance of public nudity and frankly none of them make sense to me.

Cat

Well DUH!
You'd make me feel inadequate! And by doing so inhibit my pursuit of happiness.:rolleyes:

easy.



Psssst! We live in a prudish and hypocritical society.
 
Last edited:
Well DUH!
You'd make me feel inadequate! And by doing so inhibit my pursuit of happiness.:rolleyes:

easy.

And in what way or manner would I make a Penis capable f reading feel inadequate?

One of the other arguments I have heard is that the mere sight of a nude or partialy nude person will somehow warp or injure the mentality of children. How can this be? How could the sight of a person walking nude in the street warp a child? (Other than through the illogical idea that nudity is equal to sex.)

Cat
 
And in what way or manner would I make a Penis capable f reading feel inadequate?

One of the other arguments I have heard is that the mere sight of a nude or partialy nude person will somehow warp or injure the mentality of children. How can this be? How could the sight of a person walking nude in the street warp a child? (Other than through the illogical idea that nudity is equal to sex.)

Cat


Just Pretending to read, cuz it impresses the chicks! (I'm looking at the pictures)

It is not the sight of a nude person that warps the child... it is their parent's over reaction due to their own warpedness. But you already knew that.

If you believe in this sort of thing:
God created Man and woman NAKED!!! And it was "GOOD" ...I believe it was VERY good. Only after man got things screwed up (warped) by disobeying God did he (and she) perceive their nakedness to be shameful. The real shame was in being disobedient, NOT being naked.

My own warped interpretation.:D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top