lucky-E-leven
Aphrodisiaddict
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Posts
- 17,241
Alright, you smart smut writers. I've only posted two stories here so far and still haven't figured out how the readers work. (Is this as futile a task as it seems?)
One of my stories has received a large amount of positive feedback and most of it included requests to continue the story or at the very least write more about those two characters.
I have seen in many places that some people continuously use the same characters, but do not necessarily follow a chronological order or borrow from other stories including them. How does this work for you? (Feedback/responses & also Do you find yourself constantly {re}defining the characters?)
My dilemma stems from the want to fill in the gray areas of my character's pasts without that taking over the fun stuff. But in my mind, a sequel should be loosely tied to the story before it and operate on an entirely different plot (thus standing alone).
A friend, here at lit, has suggested a prequel for the purpose of providing background and a sequel to continue the lives of the characters from the first story on.
Are sequels more like a chapter by chapter continuation? or are they separate stories including the original characters?
Are prequels just plain stupid and unnecessary?
If a sequel is written, how much does the reader expect the initial story line to be followed or maintained?
~lucky
One of my stories has received a large amount of positive feedback and most of it included requests to continue the story or at the very least write more about those two characters.
I have seen in many places that some people continuously use the same characters, but do not necessarily follow a chronological order or borrow from other stories including them. How does this work for you? (Feedback/responses & also Do you find yourself constantly {re}defining the characters?)
My dilemma stems from the want to fill in the gray areas of my character's pasts without that taking over the fun stuff. But in my mind, a sequel should be loosely tied to the story before it and operate on an entirely different plot (thus standing alone).
A friend, here at lit, has suggested a prequel for the purpose of providing background and a sequel to continue the lives of the characters from the first story on.
Are sequels more like a chapter by chapter continuation? or are they separate stories including the original characters?
Are prequels just plain stupid and unnecessary?
If a sequel is written, how much does the reader expect the initial story line to be followed or maintained?
~lucky

But this is not a bad thing, because it will open up at least ten to fifteen pages of potential.
Mwah, Lime!