Practical advice for dealing with AI rejection.

ShelbyDawn57

Fae Princess
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Posts
4,591
There have been countless threads on AI rejection over the past several months, and yet another today. As a group, we have offered and continue to offer a wide variety of suggestions to other authors fighting this dreaded demon. I'd like to see if we can consolidate some of this sage wisdom in a single thread that perhaps @Laurel and @Manu can pin to the top of this forum as an easy reference from those of us in the trenches on how to deal with the issue. I'll start with something I posted in this post a few weeks ago.

Please reply with your suggestions and let’s see what happens.

And please, let's not turn this into an argument over semantics. Let's try to keep it restricted to things that might actually help.

----

Some practical advice based on what has been working for me so far.... Other may disagree, but I have yet to see anyone answer this question with concrete examples, and no guarantees. My next story could get kicked back, too...

  1. Vary your sentence length. Short is good. Sometimes, though, you need to go longer, espouse on what you're describing, dig into the feeling of the moment to get to the core of the character's motivation. Consistent sentence length is not only boring, it's what AI does, so don't do that. Got it?
  2. Inject some personality, some emotion into your writing. "Tom hated his job and only stayed for the money." is flat, boring, mechanical. "The last fifteen minutes felt like hours as Tom watched the clock, waiting for five o'clock and his escape from the hellhole he called his job, cursing the bi-weekly check that shackled him to the tedium." says the same thing but paints a deeper picture of what Tom feels.
  3. Use big words, or as @EmilyMiller might say, sesquipedalienate(is that a word?). :)Get creative with metaphors and other figures of speech. Use Similes and personification, hyperbole, irony, euphemisms. Throw in a pun or two. Add an oxymoron. AI doesn't do these things.
  4. When it comes to grammar, use proper punctuation and spelling, but break all the other rules. Use. One. Word. Sentences. for emphasis, use dialect, y'all; do stuff like that. In dialog, remember people don't always talk in complete thoughts. Get creative with dialog tags, too.
    "Sometimes they, um, uh, you know, they, um, sort of, shit..." Derick shook his head, frustrated that the words just disappeared.
    "Lose track of what they're trying to say?" Emily chucked, showing her amusement at his discomfort.
    "Fuck you." He shook his head trying not to laugh with her.
    "Later." She winked.
    Notice none of my tags are "he said" or "she said" but you know exactly who is speaking.
You're writing a piece of fiction not a term paper or a business brief.
Bottom line, variety, creativity, use them. AI offers the median example of what it writes and only knows what it's told. Make it obvious through your words that you're not a robot, and you don't even have to click all the boxes with a bus in them.
 
Thanks for starting this, Shelby.

I think your post makes a solid core around which we can formulate all the advice we can give. I believe the guide should have an introduction where we would let the rejected authors know that this is a self-help guide based on our best guesses of how to solve their problem with AI rejection, and that there's no guarantee that their story will go through if they follow it.

In my opinion, the intro should also state that, while a good deal of the tips in the guide are what we believe to be good writing advice, some of it is mostly meant to avoid triggering the algorithm the website uses for AI detection. There are other legit writing styles, different from what we advise in the guide.

In the core, I'd add the advice to avoid the em-dash, as those are known triggers for detection algorithms.

I'd add the advice to avoid the rule of three. An example: "This guide is solid, helpful, and comprehensive."
The AI often writes sentences in such a way.

Maybe also add how AI often writes a rhetorical question and immediately answers it. And so on.
 
My work is overbrimming with these and I’ve never had a problem.
It's something I noted early on in the way AI writes. Maybe it doesn't trigger Laurel's algorithm, or maybe you have no other red flags in your stories, so the trifecta isn't enough. IDK. For me, it has always been a tell of AI-writing if it's abundantly present.
 
I'm sorry and I don't want to turn this thread into an argument (it probably will become one with or without me) but I don't believe any of these writing style mechanics issues are at all responsible for whether a story is flagged as AI generated or not 😬
 
I'm sorry and I don't want to turn this thread into an argument (it probably will become one with or without me) but I don't believe any of these writing style mechanics issues are at all responsible for whether a story is flagged as AI generated or not 😬
By all means, enlighten us then. What does lead to a story being flagged?
 
Then AI doesn’t handle anal sex with any degree of verisimilitude 🤣
Speaking of AI and anal sex. I’m quite proud how restrained I was in The Story of Nix. The only anal sex in nearly 90,000 words was Nix’s ‘creator’ calibrating her response to it with a sensor-laden probe in the lab. She never got to use this particular skill set 🤣
 
This would make an excellent Captcha: to prove you're human, derail the thread into a discussion of anal sex. I think we're onto something here.
 
Back
Top