JackLuis
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Posts
- 21,881
Hey AC!
I found this and thought that the comments beneath it interesting as well.
Actually they made the statement in regard to the first proposal for Oaksterdam's Plan to grow Pot in mass.
I think this should have been titled something like, "Oaksterdam adjusts to Federal Pot Pressures," Then the story would have been a constructive force rather than the divisive way it come over.
It's good info, but the slant obscures the facts.
I found this and thought that the comments beneath it interesting as well.
Actually they made the statement in regard to the first proposal for Oaksterdam's Plan to grow Pot in mass.
Federal prosecutors have told the city of Oakland, California, that they will prosecute pot farmers operating under the city's planned marijuana licensing scheme.
A letter from US Attorney Melinda Haag said the city's ordinance, which city council passed last year, breaks federal law and opens marijuana growers to prosecution.
But after city lawyers suggested the plan could violate federal law, the ordinance was shelved. It was this ordinance that Haag commented on in her letter, but city councilors say a new version of the law, which caps the size of each farm at 50,000 square feet, may escape prosecution.
That's because, as Haag noted in her letter, federal authorities don't pursue ill people who consume marijuana when allowed under state law. Under California law, marijuana can be cultivated by sick people with prescriptions or their "primary caregivers."
I think this should have been titled something like, "Oaksterdam adjusts to Federal Pot Pressures," Then the story would have been a constructive force rather than the divisive way it come over.
It's good info, but the slant obscures the facts.