poor gay sheep

G

Guest

Guest
here's the link http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2524408,00.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Sunday Times December 31, 2006


Science told: hands off gay sheep
Isabel Oakeshott and Chris Gourlay

Experiments that claim to ‘cure’ homosexual rams spark anger


SCIENTISTS are conducting experiments to change the sexuality of “gay” sheep in a programme that critics fear could pave the way for breeding out homosexuality in humans.
The technique being developed by American researchers adjusts the hormonal balance in the brains of homosexual rams so that they are more inclined to mate with ewes.



It raises the prospect that pregnant women could one day be offered a treatment to reduce or eliminate the chance that their offspring will be homosexual. Experts say that, in theory, the “straightening” procedure on humans could be as simple as a hormone supplement for mothers-to-be, worn on the skin like an anti-smoking nicotine patch.

The research, at Oregon State University in the city of Corvallis and at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, has caused an outcry. Martina Navratilova, the lesbian tennis player who won Wimbledon nine times, and scientists and gay rights campaigners in Britain have called for the project to be abandoned.

Navratilova defended the “right” of sheep to be gay. She said: “How can it be that in the year 2006 a major university would host such homophobic and cruel experiments?” She said gay men and lesbians would be “deeply offended” by the social implications of the tests.

But the researchers argue that the work is valid, shedding light on the “broad question” of what determines sexual orientation. They insist the work is not aimed at “curing” homosexuality.

Approximately one ram in 10 prefers to mount other rams rather than mate with ewes, reducing its value to a farmer. Initially, the publicly funded project aimed to improve the productivity of herds.

The scientists have been able to pinpoint the mechanisms influencing the desires of “male-oriented” rams by studying their brains. The animals’ skulls are cut open and electronic sensors are attached to their brains.

By varying the hormone levels, mainly by injecting hormones into the brain, they have had “considerable success” in altering the rams’ sexuality, with some previously gay animals becoming attracted to ewes.

Professor Charles Roselli, the Health and Science University biologist leading the research, defended the project.

He said: “In general, sexuality has been under-studied because of political concerns. People don’t want science looking into what determines sexuality.

“It’s a touchy issue. In fact, several studies have shown that people who believe homosexuality is biologically based are less homophobic than people who think that this orientation is acquired.”

The research is being peer-reviewed by a panel of scientists in America, demonstrating that it is being taken seriously by the academic community.

Potentially, the techniques could one day be adapted for human use, with doctors perhaps being able to offer parents pre-natal tests to determine the likely sexuality of offspring or a hormonal treatment to change the orientation of a child.

Roselli has said he would be “uncomfortable” about parents choosing sexuality, but argues that it is up to policy makers to legislate on questions of ethics.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

wake up peeps. it's 2007 :rolleyes:
 
sexuality has been understudied???? :confused:

by who? sraight people?? :rolleyes:

hell i've done a hell of a lot of studying :cool:
 
I am far more offended by the vivisection than the reason for it.
 
It will also offer parents the possibility of turning straight kids gay. So it kinda evens out.
 
rgraham666 said:
It will also offer parents the possibility of turning straight kids gay. So it kinda evens out.
guess it does but why not just leave them to be what they're supposed ta be?
 
femininity said:
guess it does but why not just leave them to be what they're supposed ta be?

Because a lot of people have erroneous ideas about sexuality.

And they are confused about who God is. ;)
 
Liar said:
So am I. But I'm kinda sure it's not me.

You're right, it's me. :D

Seriously, I think homosexuality has nothing to do with neither biology nor upbringing. You can't "make" someone gay, and I seriously doubt that anyone is born gay due to certain chemicals. I think it's just destiny.
 
And the straight sheep doesn't have curly horns, but straight ones.
 
This is positively /amazing/ research. I can see why the homosexual community is getting a bad vibe from it, but this is remarkable stuff.
 
Approximately one ram in 10 prefers to mount other rams rather than mate with ewes
From what I've read that's just about the same ratio you'll find in any population. What kills me is that they'll do this sort of worthless bullshit, but they won't allow stem cell research which will actually do good things for people.
 
Tom Collins said:
From what I've read that's just about the same ratio you'll find in any population.
Except for giraffes, that are really, REALLY gay. At least the boy giraffes are. But I guess girl giraffes don't have a natural tendency to mount things.

"Another function of necking is affectionate and sexual, in which two males will caress and court each other, leading up to mounting and climax. Same sex relations are more frequent than heterosexual behavior. In one area 94% of mounting incidents were of a homosexual nature. The proportion of same sex courtships varies between 30 and 75%, and at any given time one in twenty males will be engaged in affectionate necking behavior with another male. Females, on the other hand, only appear to have same sex relations in 1% of mounting incidents."
-Wikipedia
 
Liar said:
Except for giraffes, that are really, REALLY gay. At least the boy giraffes
I've always suspected that of giraffes. They look really gay.

And ya know, this could be a good thing. What they're doing offers scientific facts and evidence to the argument that gayness is biological, which then can be taken to court. If being gay is not a choice or voluntary lifestyle, then gay marriage, discrimination against gays, etc. might win on a legal front
 
rgraham666 said:
And they are confused about who God is. ;)

A 500 pound canary bird, flying through the cosmos with a laser sword clutched in its talons. [Don't listen to anyone who tries to tell you a 400 pound canary bird; nothing but heretics!]
 
Joe Wordsworth said:
This is positively /amazing/ research. I can see why the homosexual community is getting a bad vibe from it, but this is remarkable stuff.
The anti-gay community has always denied that there was a physiological basis for homosexuality. This sort of research wouldn't even be possible in their worldview. Looks like they'll have to get bigger blinkers.
 
Back
Top