Poll shows Warren is no sure bet for re-election next year

james_1957

Literotica Guru
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Posts
778
Isn't she the darling of the Democratic Party? Why aren't her approvals ratings higher?

Sen. Elizabeth Warren may not have an easy path to reelection in 2018.

A poll released Monday shows that 46 percent of Massachusetts voters think it’s time for someone else to have a shot at the Senate.

“It’s not a great place to start for her, but she still would be the favorite at this point,” said MassINC Polling Group President Steve Koczela, who conducted the poll with public radio station WBUR.

http://www.politico.com/states/mass...-no-sure-bet-for-re-election-next-year-108924
 
The same can be said for every single republican. 2018 is going to be a reactionary election like 2012, but this time the Repugs will be lucky to have 30%. This health care bill along with their lack of balls in dealing with the carrot topped moron has doomed them.
 
No more than Sanders is -- that is, only among the progressives, and not among those who still back the Establishment.

That's the dems issue. They're divided between traditional dems, and yahoo liberals. The yahoos are what drove America to vote for Trump.

Meanwhile the Republicans also have two factions. Cowards and scum, but they're usually on the same page.
 
That's the dems issue. They're divided between traditional dems, and yahoo liberals. The yahoos are what drove America to vote for Trump.

Not likely. Trump, after all, was not facing Sanders, he was facing Clinton, very much a "traditional dem."

Remember, early in the campaign season, many people were wavering between Trump and Sanders -- because both seemed ready to fight the plutocracy and the mainstream candidates did not. That won't happen next time -- after Trump, no RW populist will again be credible on that point; only the "yahoo liberals" will offer a credible challenge to the plutocracy, and that will win them a lot more votes than it loses them.
 
Not likely. Trump, after all, was not facing Sanders, he was facing Clinton, very much a "traditional dem."

Remember, early in the campaign season, many people were wavering between Trump and Sanders -- because both seemed ready to fight the plutocracy and the mainstream candidates did not. That won't happen next time -- after Trump, no RW populist will again be credible on that point; only the "yahoo liberals" will offer a credible challenge to the plutocracy, and that will win them a lot more votes than it loses them.

Which I never for one instant understood. I still don't.

The plutocrat will protect us/deliver us/save us from plutocracy. Truly a WTF moment. Serious wide spread purposefully embraced delusion.

Reminds me of religion. Ha.
 
Which I never for one instant understood. I still don't.

The plutocrat will protect us/deliver us/save us from plutocracy. Truly a WTF moment. Serious wide spread purposefully embraced delusion.

Reminds me of religion. Ha.

He said it, and, coming from a white man running as a Pub, they were willing to believe it, it's that simple.
 
And polls have been so accurate lately. Idiots quote polls. Oh right...James.:rolleyes:
 
He said it, and, coming from a white man running as a Pub, they were willing to believe it, it's that simple.

Yup. And it was and is idiocy incarnate. Willfully embraced mass delusion. Regardless of everything that pointed otherwise.

Better than the n*****r or the cunt, right?

That's what a lot of it came down to.
 
I'm not predicting Warren will the president, or even the nominee, or even run. Four years is forever in politics. No poll in 2017 about 2020 means anything. No such poll any sooner than after the 2018 midterms means anything.

And polls have been so accurate lately. Idiots quote polls. Oh right...James.:rolleyes:

Hey there, Adre.

Idiots quote polls?

Are you calling KO an idiot?
 
Back
Top