Roxanne Appleby
Masterpiece
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2005
- Posts
- 11,231
How do you solve a problem like Russia? Russia the new/old imperialist in its "near abroad," that is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm waiting with bated breath for the objective answer from rox. morality, capitalism and the self interest of the US citizenry, all rolled into one.
Belegon: "The choices are worded in such a manner as to make some more appealing than others... and some decidedly less appealing."
Two wrongs don't make a right.I should have let the perferctly objective polls concocted by Pure in the past be my models.![]()
ROXANNE
Nuke em, then make Russia and Georgia a WAL-MART parking lot.
How do you solve a problem like Russia?
How do you solve a problem like Maria? That's what I'd like to know.
Are you asking what we, as a nation, should do about this? I'm wondering what business we would have messing in this affair. Don't we (Americans, that is) have enough to worry about at home and with the wars we've already waged?
Quite true. Just what is our responsibility to Georgia, a country that shares a border with Russia?
Did you hear what mcCain said? "In the 21st century, nations don't invade other nations."
Oops!
If you ask me, the US certainly knew about Russia's plans well in advance and Putin moved in with Washington's implicit assurance that we would do nothing. We have satellites. We knew where their troops were. It's no coincidence that Bush was in China and Rice was on vacation. We're allowing Russia a buffer zone of adjacent states that they've traditionally controlled as a face-saving move.
But he lied. "Peace in our time" was a lie. Chamberlain lied, people died.The poll is also unfair to Chamberlain.
He knew that his allies, particularly France, wouldn't fight and the UK armed forces were in no state to wage a war against Germany either with their aliies and certainly not on their own. The votes of the UK weren't ready to fight for foreign countries they had barely heard of.
He bought time that enabled Britain to rearm - not enough time but time that was vital. Without that time the Battle of Britain would have been lost.
Chamberlain was hamstrung by decisions of his predecessors who had decided that disarmament was economically more important than preparing for another war.
Og