Liar
now with 17% more class
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Posts
- 43,715
In that particular case? The wishes of Laurel. Obviously you read my entire post with a pair of very special glasses on. I don't want to ban written fiction about...well...anything. But Laurel has stated that there are things she don't want of HER site. (We gotta remember that, people, we don't own and are not responsible for Lit. She is.) So when I saw something that I knew (because she said so) that she don't want on Lit, I let her know.CharleyH said:I will smile for now. Porn defined today, was not porn defined yesterday. Shit man, in yesteyear people were married at 14, and a king had wives at eight years (his age). LOL WHAT IS WRONG WITH SEX UNDER the age of 18, when the whole of history points to it? EDIT TO ADD: When the whole of humanity wants it when they become sexually aware?
What are we protecting, exactly?
What FTF did was ask "do you want this on Lit?". Laurel is free to reply "Yep."
That is all.
And there you crossed the line from discourse to sillyness. C'mon, snoogums. You can do better than that.CharleyH said:You are a censor and not an author.
Last edited: