Please recommend any good stories where guy has relationships with hung futa.

[wissen]

Hi all!

I was reading manga Tsuiteru Kanojo (Niku), where male MC is building relationships with very beautiful girl who happened to be a futanari.

But she not only has a penis, but in fact she is much bigger than him (but it's not hentai, so many scenes are completely censored). Plus, in many cases she is way cooler, more confident and more independent than him.

So I am looking for a long vanila story or romance novel with similar plot but with more adult stuff.

Some additional requirements:

* no toilet stuff or BDSM and violence, but very good romance

* girl may be much bigger than normal male, for example 12" and above

* I really like physically and mentally strong females, so if female lead will surpass male lead in these aspects too I would be happy

* but no giantess or mini-GTS, please

* and it should be a futa, not a guy turned into girl

Thank you in advance!

 

[AwkwardMD]

I think that the authors WhiskeyIsGood, LaraLongstaff, and SugarAndSalt probably fit the bill

 

[wissen]

I think that the authors WhiskeyIsGood, LaraLongstaff, and SugarAndSalt probably fit the bill

Thank you, but these author write mostly about shemales and transvestites, not futanary. And rare stories about futas just do not fit the bill also.

 

[AwkwardMD]

Don't get too caught up in the distinctions between the three because there is no standard by which those characters can be reliably defined. Intersex stories tend to be about blurring lines rather than making new classifications and boxes to fit into.

Poison, for example, was retconned to be a newhalf, but for the purposes of an erotic short story there is no functional difference in how I as an author would write her. The difference is in how you, the reader, create your mental image.

 

[AlinaX]

For me, as a reader and writer of futa erotica, the distinctions between these are significant. Futanari are not intersex or trans women, but rather something other that both incorporates and transcends male and female.

Also, I intensely dislike the word "shemale" - mainly from a political perspective, but also because I often find myself thrown out of stories by the crude understanding of gender (and in some cases simple misogyny) of authors who use the word.

I don't really write futa-on-male romance, but fwiw there's a bit in:
https://www.literotica.com/s/sparra-the-futa-superhero
https://www.literotica.com/s/wedding-tackle

 

[AwkwardMD]

EDIT: Any non-binary-conforming character could be written as or misunderstood by the reader to be any or all of the buzzwords listed above depending on the context, so spending time trying to reinforce the lines between them only makes the exceptions that much more glaring.

Normalize them all by thinking of them inclusively.

 

[AlinaX]

Isn't "non-binary-conforming" a contradiction in terms?

But it's not about inclusivity, and distinctions are critical. None of the terms are umbrellas, except maybe non-binary. And in the case of futanari I feel it's important to distinguish them from intersex where hermaphroditism has a specific meaning, i.e., futanari are not a hyper-sexualisation of intersex people.

Futanari are a fantasy. You can't normalise them. Maybe one day we will be able to surgically (or however) alter our bodies to be futanari, in which case I'll be happy to argue for inclusivity, but until then...

 

[AwkwardMD]

Everything we write on this site is fantasy. You arguing for accuracy also means we should stop allowing noncon because it's rape or incest because it is illegal.

Word policing is small-minded! Think bigger! Let fantasy be fantasy and blur the lines!!

 

[AlinaX]

Except that if I'm looking for a satisfying futanari fantasy, I'm not interested in trans women or cross dressers.

I wrote a story in which a man dresses up and likes to imagine himself a futa, but that doesn't make him a futa. These distinctions are important because, fantasy or not, suspension of disbelief is always easier if the characters are believable. A man in a dress is a man, though he may like to imagine himself a woman (or, in this case, futa) and adopt the persona of one. A trans woman is a woman, regardless of how she dresses or behaves.

If a guy wakes up one morning with breasts and a pussy instead of a cock, is he necessarily a girl? I read a story here recently where a guy decided he was a girl because that's what he looked like - but who actually thinks like that? If a girl wakes up one morning with a cock in addition to her usual genitals, does she automatically think of herself as a futa? We may label her as such, but how would she consider herself?

I'm not saying everyone needs to be as fussy as I am about these things, but I'm fussy with reason and I am easily irritated by stories that simply fail to make sense to me.

 

[Galgaree]

Blech. This is where I stop trying to think for you or the first poster and say, "Write it your own goddamn self."

 

[AlinaX]

Did you ever start?

 

[AwkwardMD]

Who/what/how a character is underneath their clothes matters less than how they want to be interpreted/received/addressed. Your compartmentalization, insisting that there need to be a finite number of 'types' that adhere to rules, is absurd and backwards, and frankly I'm shocked to see a fellow TG/CD Hall of Famer thinking so narrowly.

 

[AlinaX]

I think you don't understand what I'm saying. I'm all for people self-identifying, and I'm not enforcing a binary or any finite set of rules. If anything, my objection to labels like "shemale" is that they do enforce a set of negative stereotypes.

But your insistence on blurring definitions confuses me. It's like saying gay and lesbian erotica should be thrown in with the rest - which I don't have a problem with, except many people like having these distinctions. It's easier to find the stories you want to read and avoid the ones you don't.

As far as TG/CD goes, there are clear distinctions between femdom sissification, trans erotica and futanari - and various other and blends of all, but why make a blur of it?

The only rule I'm insisting on, I suppose, is that we don't choose our own innate gender (whatever it might be). It's a part of who we are, our core identity. Otherwise I might as well be a man on Fridays and a woman on Wednesdays...

... which might make for an interesting story. Spin-the-dial in the morning to see what gender you'll be that day...

 

[AwkwardMD]

Gay and Lesbian SHOULD be thrown in woth the rest, and I have long argued for that. Gay isn't a category or genre any more than anal is. A gay romance is exactly the same as a straight romance.

There should just be filters for things readers get squeamish about, not more categories. You wouldn't make categories for the days of the week just because some readers don't like mondays.

 

[ElectricBlue]

There should just be filters for things readers get squeamish about, not more categories. You wouldn't make categories for the days of the week just because some readers don't like mondays.

In the absence of a more sophisticated tag oriented filter system (coming soon, right ), the categories, for better or worse, are the only crude filter we've got. I agree, for Romance it 'shouldn't' matter what gender combinations are involved, but for homophobes, misogynists, man-haters and kink-shamers, it does, and we all know that. The same applies for all other categories.

Given how crude and unsatisfactory the categories and definitions are, the problems only arise when the tiny-minded self-appointed 'category police' start ranting (and punishing) stories that don't apply to their 'rules'. To which the answer always is, "If you don't like it, back out, move on, leave the writer alone. I don't care what you don't like, I don't care about you. But let the writers write, oh numb-nuts with no work of your own" - which is normally always the case with the category police.

 

[wissen]

Don't get too caught up in the distinctions between the three because there is no standard by which those characters can be reliably defined.

I understand your point, but for me the difference is critical. Futanari is a female in the first place. With little extra. While shemales and trans are/were males. For me this difference is important.

 

[wissen]

Gay and Lesbian SHOULD be thrown in woth the rest, and I have long argued for that. Gay isn't a category or genre any more than anal is. A gay romance is exactly the same as a straight romance.

There should just be filters for things readers get squeamish about, not more categories. You wouldn't make categories for the days of the week just because some readers don't like mondays.

Well, for me categories don't matter, because I am using tag search or google text search. The problem is that tags are not filled correctly/fully in many cases and text search is sometimes very complicated.

 

[wissen]

Blech. This is where I stop trying to think for you or the first poster and say, "Write it your own goddamn self."

Well, I am writing my stories (though, most of them do not fit this site). But I am not a good, nor fast writer to embody all my ideas. That's why I am searching.

 

[DaddiYo89]

I understand your point, but for me the difference is critical. Futanari is a female in the first place. With little extra. While shemales and trans are/were males. For me this difference is important.

Lol you were definitely being homophobic here

 

[DaddiYo89]

I think you don't understand what I'm saying. I'm all for people self-identifying, and I'm not enforcing a binary or any finite set of rules. If anything, my objection to labels like "shemale" is that they do enforce a set of negative stereotypes.

But your insistence on blurring definitions confuses me. It's like saying gay and lesbian erotica should be thrown in with the rest - which I don't have a problem with, except many people like having these distinctions. It's easier to find the stories you want to read and avoid the ones you don't.

As far as TG/CD goes, there are clear distinctions between femdom sissification, trans erotica and futanari - and various other and blends of all, but why make a blur of it?

The only rule I'm insisting on, I suppose, is that we don't choose our own innate gender (whatever it might be). It's a part of who we are, our core identity. Otherwise I might as well be a man on Fridays and a woman on Wednesdays...

... which might make for an interesting story. Spin-the-dial in the morning to see what gender you'll be that day...

The end of this write up was wading way way to close exclusionary tendencies
And your objection to the word shemale doesn't mean anything if you're insisting people can't be who they are like that's the premise of the entire genre in which you're already a hall of famer

 

[AlinaX]

Huh, so this is where that conversation was…

And I really don’t understand you. Gender isn’t a choice. Far too much of transphobia is based on the idea that trans women are men choosing to identify as women. If gender were a choice, trans people could choose to be the gender aligning with sex assigned at birth. But it’s not a choice.

As far as stories go, a male character who is coerced into wearing a dress doesn’t magically become female. They can choose to present as a woman, they can choose to accept being treated as a woman, but fundamentally they are not a woman - *except* if they are. Perhaps wearing a dress is what causes their egg to crack. Perhaps they are coming to terms with a facet of themselves they never allowed themselves to see before. Perhaps…

And I get there are so many nuances to this, and I love how nuanced it can be, but… I don’t like lazy storytelling.