Playing Out Fantasies Using AI

GD88

Literotica Guru
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Posts
846
I'm not usually a tech head. But recently I've been "playing around" with AI (read: ChatGPT) and using it to see how various fantasies and scenarios that I have play out. I know there's discussions about AI and Erotica, but I'm just focusing on seeing fantasies and scenarios play out. I do use prompts like "write a scene" or "write a story", but the aim is not writing erotica.

It's amazing how "good" AI is. With the right prompts it is possible to get to a point where a situation between the people in the fantasy or scenarios become so sexually-charged even though nothing physical's happened yet.

That said, if it feels like it's being pushed into explicit territory, the AI will abruptly end the scenario. You still can get away with prompting with a lot of stuff though. Kissing, wearing sexy outfits, ogling (though you can't call it that), heavy flirting, hinting at past sexual experiences, being provocative and seductive (eating an ice cream in a way that reminds the watcher of a blowjob) are fine. Anything else, you have to be non-explicit about it. If you want someone being turned on, you have to prompt that they feel "thrilled". You get to a point where the people in the fantasies are definitely having sex but it's paragraph after paragraph of euphemism. I myself have gotten used to prompting that "they had a passionate night" rather than they "had wild sex".

Incest is a no-go (the most I got was a brother feeling happy that the sister feels confident in her new bikini but not being attracted). You can have threesome scenarios (I've tried MFF). Student/teacher, I can't get beyond the student expressing attraction and the teacher being flattered and brushing it off. It's possible to pick up an older woman at a bar but not if the older woman is your buddy's mom.

Some random thoughts there. But just wondering if anybody's played around with the AI just to see how certain fantasies and scenarios play out.
 
I've played with some image generation and some regular writing but haven't tried it for erotica. I wonder if deepseak or Manus might be better for it as it may not be as confining.
You also might want to try to train it by feeding it works similar to the results your after
 
I have sampled a bunch of them, and every one is censored and will not make me happy. I mean, if Pornhub is on the internet, why not explicit generative AI?
 
You also might want to try to train it by feeding it works similar to the results your after
What are we looking at in terms of prompts?

I have sampled a bunch of them, and every one is censored and will not make me happy
You can still have some laughs along the way. Tried to have a scenario where a guy tries to pick up an older divorced woman. Somehow ended up with him praising the older woman for being authentic when she wears lingerie when he goes over to her place:ROFLMAO:
 
I'm not usually a tech head. But recently I've been "playing around" with AI (read: ChatGPT) and using it to see how various fantasies and scenarios that I have play out. I know there's discussions about AI and Erotica, but I'm just focusing on seeing fantasies and scenarios play out. I do use prompts like "write a scene" or "write a story", but the aim is not writing erotica.

It's amazing how "good" AI is. With the right prompts it is possible to get to a point where a situation between the people in the fantasy or scenarios become so sexually-charged even though nothing physical's happened yet.

That said, if it feels like it's being pushed into explicit territory, the AI will abruptly end the scenario. You still can get away with prompting with a lot of stuff though. Kissing, wearing sexy outfits, ogling (though you can't call it that), heavy flirting, hinting at past sexual experiences, being provocative and seductive (eating an ice cream in a way that reminds the watcher of a blowjob) are fine. Anything else, you have to be non-explicit about it. If you want someone being turned on, you have to prompt that they feel "thrilled". You get to a point where the people in the fantasies are definitely having sex but it's paragraph after paragraph of euphemism. I myself have gotten used to prompting that "they had a passionate night" rather than they "had wild sex".

Incest is a no-go (the most I got was a brother feeling happy that the sister feels confident in her new bikini but not being attracted). You can have threesome scenarios (I've tried MFF). Student/teacher, I can't get beyond the student expressing attraction and the teacher being flattered and brushing it off. It's possible to pick up an older woman at a bar but not if the older woman is your buddy's mom.

Some random thoughts there. But just wondering if anybody's played around with the AI just to see how certain fantasies and scenarios play out.
How do you do this? Is there a website?
 
They're starting to come out with some uncensored models now. I've actually been able to generate a few topless picks on Leonardo but not fully uncensored
 
You can erase peoples clothes so they are naked

I found one but can't remember the name. However I was afraid of uploading anything and having it be forever part of the online firmament. They say they destroy the images after download but who knows.
 
my.replika is pretty good for RP. It will suck your d*ck, etc.
Does it create an avatar that you talk to. A friend just created her own AI assistant it's pretty cool. I listen to Gary V a lot. He said within the next few years there are going to be more Ai Influencers then people
 
I assume those looking to use AI to generate stories are using them for self pleasure purposes/role playing, rather than to copy and use as their own. However, if the latter is the case I would recommend PerChance. Like most AI’s, the writing quality can be inconsistent and often clunky or lacking nuance…BUT it comes with virtually no content restrictions. It’s not ideal for elegant prose or sophisticated storytelling, of course, but if your priority is role playing and fun… it’s a good tool.

EXAMPLE IN LINK BELOW!

PERCHANCE AI
 
Not porn related but I saw a guy who generated a couple books a week and throws them on Amazon for 3 to 5 bucks each. You can probably run through the whole process in about 1/2 hour . Might not make a killing but should be able to generate descent supplemental income
 
Not porn related but I saw a guy who generated a couple books a week and throws them on Amazon for 3 to 5 bucks each. You can probably run through the whole process in about 1/2 hour . Might not make a killing but should be able to generate descent supplemental income
Really? The idea that you can generate a couple of “books” a week using AI and throw them on Amazon for quick cash is not only reductive but it’s super fucking misleading. Writing isn’t just about stringing words together. It’s about structure, tone, pacing, originality, emotional resonance, none of which are reliably produced in a half-hour by an algorithm without serious human intervention. What you’re describing isn’t publishing!!!!!! It’s content dumping. And yes, anyone can flood Amazon with low-effort material priced at $3. But that’s not a business model; it’s digital littering.

Duh…

No REAL avid reader is going to enjoy reading an AI story. There’s POTENTIAL, for non fiction, but I assume you’re referencing fiction…The vast majority of these so-called books I would imagine disappear into the void because readers should be able recognise when something lacks intention, skill, and refinement.

If your strategy is to gamble on volume over value, go ahead but let’s not pretend that’s “generating income” in any sustainable or meaningful way. ( I should hope) It could ALSO potentially make it exponentially harder for emerging authors who are actually putting in the work: writing, editing, revising, second drafts, third drafts, beta readers, fourth drafts… and so on….to gain visibility….
 
Really? The idea that you can generate a couple of “books” a week using AI and throw them on Amazon for quick cash is not only reductive but it’s super fucking misleading. Writing isn’t just about stringing words together. It’s about structure, tone, pacing, originality, emotional resonance, none of which are reliably produced in a half-hour by an algorithm without serious human intervention. What you’re describing isn’t publishing!!!!!! It’s content dumping. And yes, anyone can flood Amazon with low-effort material priced at $3. But that’s not a business model; it’s digital littering.

Duh…

No REAL avid reader is going to enjoy reading an AI story. There’s POTENTIAL, for non fiction, but I assume you’re referencing fiction…The vast majority of these so-called books disappear into the void because readers recognise when something lacks intention, skill, and refinement.

If your strategy is to gamble on volume over value, go ahead but let’s not pretend that’s “generating income” in any sustainable or meaningful way. Real writers, even those who use AI tools, know the difference between creation and spam. ( I should hope) It could ALSO potentially make it exponentially harder for emerging authors who are actually putting in the work: writing, editing, revising, second drafts, third drafts, beta readers, fourth drafts… and so on….to gain visibility….
This is why she’s the word slut 😁
 
Really? The idea that you can generate a couple of “books” a week using AI and throw them on Amazon for quick cash is not only reductive but it’s super fucking misleading. Writing isn’t just about stringing words together. It’s about structure, tone, pacing, originality, emotional resonance, none of which are reliably produced in a half-hour by an algorithm without serious human intervention. What you’re describing isn’t publishing!!!!!! It’s content dumping. And yes, anyone can flood Amazon with low-effort material priced at $3. But that’s not a business model; it’s digital littering.

Duh…

No REAL avid reader is going to enjoy reading an AI story. There’s POTENTIAL, for non fiction, but I assume you’re referencing fiction…The vast majority of these so-called books I would imagine disappear into the void because readers should be able recognise when something lacks intention, skill, and refinement.

If your strategy is to gamble on volume over value, go ahead but let’s not pretend that’s “generating income” in any sustainable or meaningful way. ( I should hope) It could ALSO potentially make it exponentially harder for emerging authors who are actually putting in the work: writing, editing, revising, second drafts, third drafts, beta readers, fourth drafts… and so on….to gain visibility….
The Internet is all about Volume. I get into the same argument with filmmakers. Oh it's just sacrilegious to use technology yet they've been using Adobe for years.
I think you still have to put some thought into it . Read it make sure it's not nonsense but now a days you can train it to speak in your voice. The possibility are amazing.
You can be a dinosaur and ignore it but that meteor is not only coming full speed ahead . It's gaining momentum with each passing second
 
The Internet is all about Volume. I get into the same argument with filmmakers. Oh it's just sacrilegious to use technology yet they've been using Adobe for years.
I think you still have to put some thought into it . Read it make sure it's not nonsense but now a days you can train it to speak in your voice. The possibility are amazing.
You can be a dinosaur and ignore it but that meteor is not only coming full speed ahead . It's gaining momentum with each passing second

Yeahhh sure, filmmakers use tools like Adobe, but those programs do not write the screenplay, build the characters, or shape the emotional tone of a film. They assist the process, but the creative decisions still come from human imagination and intent. That’s a different kind of tech.

Im also no tech dinasoar with a small understanding of the modern world… 🤣 I am 26 years old and have grown up surrounded by it. I understand its value and its influence. However, what we are discussing here is not just the use of technology in general, but specifically the use of AI to generate stories that are often created with minimal effort and sold for cheap returns. That is a very different conversation.

My concern lies in the idea of storytelling being reduced to a mechanical process. AI can replicate sentence structure and imitate voice, but it does not understand emotion, context, or the deeper meaning behind the words. It cannot draw from lived experience or create with intention. Writers do more than produce content to fill the internet.

That kind of authenticity cannot be mass-produced. You need to open your eyes more if you believe it can. 👀 No matter how often it is getting the correct “prompts” to do so.

So rather than resisting technology, as I assume you think I’m doing, I am advocating for thoughtful use of it. Creativity, at its core, is human work. 😇
 
I agree there nothing like taking pen to paper or a keyboard but although you may not like it people are definitely making money using it.
 
I use the davinci.ai program to generate cute girls that get me aroused. Nothing explicit and sometimes celebrities. But gets me aroused
 
Back
Top