Physical Anthropology

[Wooduck]

Would anyone take the challenge of writing a story in which man interacts with Gigantopithecus? It's theorized that if Bigfoot indeed exists that he is a relative of this early hominid. I think this could be a truly interesting story if the right author steps up. Author should take full credit and write the story the way he/she sees fit. If it contains eroticism fine if not that's fine too. Thanks for taking the time to read this thread and I sincerely hope someone considers this.

 

[VladHarkonnen]

Would anyone take the challenge of writing a story in which man interacts with Gigantopithecus? It's theorized that if Bigfoot indeed exists that he is a relative of this early hominid. I think this could be a truly interesting story if the right author steps up. Author should take full credit and write the story the way he/she sees fit. If it contains eroticism fine if not that's fine too. Thanks for taking the time to read this thread and I sincerely hope someone considers this.

Wouldn't any bigfoot story be a gigantopithecus story?

 

[astuffedshirt_perv]

He must have an enormous schwanstuecker...

 

[MatthewVett]

He must have an enormous schwanstuecker...

Actually, he probably doesn't Gorillas are only one and a half inches long, on average. Even scaling up, you'd be less than three inches.

As for the story, this is likely to fall under bestiality, since it's a real animal that is obviously not human.

 

[Carnevil9]

Actually, he probably doesn't Gorillas are only one and a half inches long, on average. Even scaling up, you'd be less than three inches.

As for the story, this is likely to fall under bestiality, since it's a real animal that is obviously not human.

Depends how big his feet are.

As for "real animal," you might get around that by pitching him as a "mythical beast." Probably a gray area. Can we get a judges ruling?

 

[MatthewVett]

I think once you have bones, it's no longer mythical. Gigantopithecus is pretty nonmythical: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantopithecus

 

[Wooduck]

I did stipulate the story could be erotic or not didn't matter to me.
There are some stories here about people having sex with Neanderthalensis is that beastiality? Although some carry Neanderthal DNA their genome is not the same as ours. These hominids also were on a different evolutionary branch than humans. I guess my point is at what point do we differentiate here? Seriously is it a matter of nucleotide base pairs or what?

 

[emap]

The difference is that neanderthals turned in to humans. Not bestiality since it is basically like having sex with your cousin.

This thing is closer to having sex with a gorilla. Really big fucking gorilla but a gorilla. Also, there's no telling if it is actually deceased or not, think about it, yeti, bigfoot, sasquatch. All big creatures that are hairy and not really human but walk on two feet, which is what they think that thing does and it fits with the descriptions of those listed above.

Not human so animal and thus sex with one is considered bestiality, course if you run in to one and it wants to get laid with you, don't argue they are probably lots stronger. Not that a story of that encounter would be posted here. Try the tabloids.

 

[Carnevil9]

"I Had Bigfoot's Love-Child!" -- Paula Abdul's shocking story.

 

[Wooduck]

Again I did say the story didn't have to be erotic. Secondly, Homo Neanderthalensis never "turned into" or evolved into Homo Sapiens. Look at a recent evolutionary tree and you'll find H Neanderthalensis on a different branch as I previously stated. They were close enough genetically that inbreeding occurred, but they were not able to dominate like H. Sapiens most likely due to longer gestational periods and lesser intelligence. There were bipeds in the lineage that took a different route and were not precursors to H. Sapiens. Paranthropus robustus or P. Bosei are prime examples. I'm guessing no one has any interest in writing a non erotic version but I would like to thank the ones who took the time to read and reply to my request.

 

[VladHarkonnen]

I bet if you just say "neandertals" people will know what you mean. It's when you're talking about the australopithecines that shit can get confusing for people.

 

[Tio_Narratore]

I bet if you just say "neandertals" people will know what you mean. It's when you're talking about the australopithecines that shit can get confusing for people.

Gigantopithecus is even further; you'd have to at least have it be a hominin to avoid the bestiality issue. Australopithecines would be ok. Push for a robust species to make it more contrastive.