Philosophical Psychobabble for the Masses.

Black_Bird

Not Innocent
Joined
Oct 26, 2001
Posts
9,019
Rule One: Take the name of someone sophisticated and add 'ian' to the end, then use it as an adjective.

Rule Two: Use words you don't understand. Use a lot of them. Make a few up, if you really want to impress them: Metaheliphizoid is always a crowd pleaser.

Rule Three: Whatever book they they are talking about, you have already read it. It doesn't even matter if you never even heard of the author or the subject: you've read it. No one will know, because none of them have read any of those books either.

Rule Four: Fraud was an idiot. If you say any different, they'll just laugh at you. Remember: Fraud was an idiot.

Rule Five: If you ever get caught faking it, just write it off as a flaw in their logic. They'll spend the next half an hour trying to figure out if the meaning of "it" has changed in the last week, during which they will have completely forgotten what the conversation was originally about.

Rule Six: God does not exist. To anyone who says otherwise, you should recomend they read a book... doesn't matter which book, just recomend one.

Rule Seven: No matter what, you are right.
 
Yes. This is just what I was tring to say/not say at that party/notparty from the other night/day.....

what does this have to do with fucking sex!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Cynthia Zane:kiss:
 
9 times out of 10 I am more than happy to admit that I haven't got a fucking clue.

Nothing worse than a teacher who pretends to know something. Feaks the kids out too when I do it, admit I do not know. Teachers know everything! Don't they?

But I always tell them I know where, and how to find out. That is what is important.
 
For the love of God (yeah, I know he doesn't exist) BB please stop all this exhumaliseationalism and I recommend a great book called Your Inner Self - Finding Peace and Fuck the World written by Konrad Egleberger.

This will help you come to terms with your Pseudo Macdonaldalian complex
 
i couldn't disagree more without thinking about it!

If God were my witness(which of course is meaningless) i would stand before you aghast at the Lennonian blabonyism of this entire hubba-bubba!

As far back as the teachings of Microcephalus, the unfailing fallacity of the Blabonic Enfallusion has bebuggered the haggard to the horrible of us all!

Meskaflexically speaking "If it were so, 'twould be painfully oblivious" as Horsecartus wrote in his "Malleus Maximus".

Begone the gibberous lot of ye. i rest in pieces!
 
NO! of COURSE not!

foxinsox said:


Can we have that in English, please? Preferably in words of two syllables, or less.

:D

That would violate Rules 2 & 3
Is this a trick Question?

Well i KNOW the answer...
but i'm not tellin':p
 
VanB said:
For the love of God (yeah, I know he doesn't exist) BB please stop all this exhumaliseationalism and I recommend a great book called Your Inner Self - Finding Peace and Fuck the World written by Konrad Egleberger.

This will help you come to terms with your Pseudo Macdonaldalian complex

I've already read that; Egleberger's logic is flawed.
 
Black_Bird said:


I've already read that; Egleberger's logic is flawed.

Man, you just haven't grasped the conchigliatorial way he posthumanizes the conflicting areas of mikhaelides and spencerianism residing in each and every one of us.
 
VanB said:
Man, you just haven't grasped the conchigliatorial way he posthumanizes the conflicting areas of mikhaelides and spencerianism residing in each and every one of us.

You are forgetting the Dudilogical Pirxistyxian principle. You are so Fraudian!

Its, its just too damn early for this argument... I have no time to explain it all to you! You'll just have to read Andrionic Modules by Eric Speelinkbeez and figure it out on your own.
 
Read "The Sale of Two Titties" by Darles Chickens the famous Swedish author... it explains the principles of Beschnugelism, as laid down by the famous Hindu, German, Australian, Haitian philosopher Beschnugel Arfroble Geshnibet...

Life would be so much simpler if we could all stick to the tenets found within this mighty tome. ;)
 
Kiwiwolf, you're logic is flawed. I'd really wish you'd stop recomending out-dated texts. The concepts presented in "The Sale of Two Titties" was made invalid 2 minutes ago when "Wabble Knockers" by Eliot Fancyboy hit the book shelves. Pick up a copy and don't speak again until you read it.
 
Rule five is out of sequence and rule six is redundant. Otherwise, B-b, the rules are not simply meant to be read and I suggest seminars $300 per day and follow-up supervision, establishing the b-b cult centre and accepting the status of guru, while all the time denying that you are a guru and telling everyone they're wonderful..

Appendix:
You get to screw as many chicks as you like.
 
freescorfr said:
Rule five is out of sequence and rule six is redundant. Otherwise, B-b, the rules are not simply meant to be read and I suggest seminars $300 per day and follow-up supervision, establishing the b-b cult centre and accepting the status of guru, while all the time denying that you are a guru and telling everyone they're wonderful...

Huh.

Appendix:
You get to screw as many chicks as you like.

Oh. Cool.
 
umm....weird...hi BB *cute lil peck on his cheek*
~love ya~
Silver
 
YES i AM!!! and I am carrying all 20 thousand of your unborn eggs!!! :p

*cackles*
I want child support!!
 
Silverluna said:
YES i AM!!! and I am carrying all 20 thousand of your unborn eggs!!! :p *cackles* I want child support!!

Child support has no place in a Philosophical Psychobabble argument; we only speak of Hyperextentionism and Deplastimechnicpolyian theory. This is important stuff; we are arguing about the texture of the very fabric of reality! No practical social commentary can hold a candle to that.
 
But BB you are Denying the truth....think about the children!! our children!! *pleads!!*:mad:
 
Silverluna said:
But BB you are Denying the truth....think about the children!! our children!! *pleads!!*:mad:

Hyperextentionism and Deplastimechnicpolyian theory! If you can't discuss these in their proper context, then I suggest you read the grand philosophical text "God picks his nose" by I. M. Weezle, because everything you has said so far is logical failicy.
 
Back
Top