Petticoat Discipline.....

petticoat...... do you mean corset? ...... petticoat I believe is the fluffy thing that goes beneath skirts.
Though I may be wrong.
 
Petticoat Discipline is when if you are bad I russle your cattle.
 
Croctden said:
Petticoat Discipline is when if you are bad I russle your cattle.

Really? You mean, like rustling leaves, but with more mooing?

My suspicion is something like "You are required to dress in crinolin and lace with lots of petticoats, and drawl like Ms Scarlet."

Well, only a theory.
 
Janettt...

You have GOT to give us more to work with on these threads. Seriously LOL.

Tell us a story. Give us your take on what you're talking about. Don't just drop something obtuse in here and expect us to run with it. PLEASE!

~anelize
 
By Petticoat Discipline, I mean forcing a male sub...

to wear women's clothes.
 
Re: By Petticoat Discipline, I mean forcing a male sub...

janettt5 said:
to wear women's clothes.

The correct term is feminization. If you force him it is forced feminization.
 
I just asked the one person I know who's into forced feminization (and has magazines, etc. on the subject) and he's never heard it called petticoat discipline either. Where'd you find the term, janettt5?
 
I read in a book ages ago it was called that...

and was used in days long ago in England to discipline unruly boys in the home.
 
A Google search for petticoat discipline did turn up a few results, but it looks like there's a lot more involved than just forced feminization. It's got a femdom schoolteacher/mother aspect, it seems. I did find this page that purports to be a historical account, but the site itself is a fetish site rather than a scholarly journal. I also found a site about infantilism that has a definition of petticoat discipline, directly quoted from The Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices (which I do have downstairs somewhere but I'm not going to get it now).
 
Etoile said:
A Google search for petticoat discipline did turn up a few results, but it looks like there's a lot more involved than just forced feminization. It's got a femdom schoolteacher/mother aspect, it seems. I did find this page that purports to be a historical account, but the site itself is a fetish site rather than a scholarly journal. I also found a site about infantilism that has a definition of petticoat discipline, directly quoted from The Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices (which I do have downstairs somewhere but I'm not going to get it now).
That may be so, but that is not what she said. If she is referring to the practice of forcing a sub to wear women's clothing, she is referring to forced feminization.
 
The way that I read it on the site that I found is that it was more a humilation thing to keep younger unruly boys in line, by not allowing them to wear underwear under a kilt.



click here
 
Native Alien said:
The way that I read it on the site that I found is that it was more a humilation thing to keep younger unruly boys in line, by not allowing them to wear underwear under a kilt.



click here

Now you know why those scots were always fighting!
 
FungiUg said:
Yeah, and those thistles are downright cruel!

You know I got to look under a kilt one time.

Made me want to hop a jet to Scotland!
 
Ebonyfire said:
You know I got to look under a kilt one time.

Made me want to hop a jet to Scotland!

When I got married, my best man was wearing a kilt... and my sister's partner is a piper in a pipe band and they do the kilt thing too!

"Anything worn under the kilt?"

"No, it's all in perfect working order!"
 
FungiUg said:
When I got married, my best man was wearing a kilt... and my sister's partner is a piper in a pipe band and they do the kilt thing too!

"Anything worn under the kilt?"

"No, it's all in perfect working order!"

I have to agree it certainly looked more than functional.
 
very interesting stuff. the scots definitely know what's going on.
 
YES!! And it's GREAT!!

arialred
janettt5 said:
Has anyone here given, or received it?

My Dear,

Last year, my assistant, my sex partner, and then my lover, introduced me to her very strict female domination, humiliation and the purely ecstatic life of a sissymaid. Her friends and family knew, and I was happy for the first time in my life! I wasn’t allowed to have my own friends, so my Mistress’s life was all I came to know and care about. She toyed with me and used "petticoat punishment" frequently. Another contributor is absolutely correct about the following: No matter how much a sub loves punishment of any type, especially petticoat punishment for me, there is ALWAYS a time when it is totally inappropriate, impossible, and a horrible thing to even consider. Now, THAT"S when she does it!

I believe that the key to our relationship working so well was that I believed that she loved me. She took my identity, driver's license, credit cards, cash, etc., and replaced them with only ID's and cards under the name she gave me. I wore a collar, and she was free to give the leash to anyone she wished. I was loaned or rented for housework, hairdressing, stag parties, maid service at parties, etc.

Inexplicably, I found that I especially loved the single scariest and monstrously humiliating thing that I feared the most. My Mistress would instruct me to suck the cocks of her friends, neighbors, ex-husband, and her dates. She also came up with the idea of me sucking off every man from her past that she ever had sex with, and every willing former male friend of mine. Wow! Now that was an experience beyond humiliation. The way I handled it was to just be pretty Stephanie, and to pretend that I simply never met these men before.

I have no understanding of why I am totally entranced by the horribly wonderful things that my Mistress did to me. I actually don't care why, because I don't want any psychological junk to cloud my thinking. Under the spell of my Mistress, thinking only gets me in trouble anyway.

Sounds like I'm doing well. doesn't it? Well, my money ran out, the drugs ran out, and my Mistress exited, leaving me with a huge gaping hole in my heart.

I think that I must connect with a new Mistress immediately, just to keep my sanity. I refuse to believe that that 1 person can be the sole key to my happiness. So, I want to get "out there."

Can you find any kind or encouraging words for me? I need a friend who understands the incredibly strong grasp that this lifestyle has on me. I never want to change, but I desperately need to practice and I want to get better at it all. Serving my Mistress! Ahh!

Thanks for listening. I need to talk and listen now, because I expect that it's going to be quite a while before I can trust and surrender to a Mistress again.

Yours truly,

Stephanie
 
Last edited:
Dear Stephanie,

If your story is for real, it sounds like you have been horribly taken advantage of. For someone to build trust and then abandon is one of the worst things IMO.

The drugs ran out? That sounds scary and unwise to say the least.

If your story is a fantasy, you should try your hand at writing.

Best wishes regardless. No I am NOT a Domme and I don't have a handy index to hook you up but again best wishes.

Fury :rose:
 
Native Alien said:
The way that I read it on the site that I found is that it was more a humilation thing to keep younger unruly boys in line, by not allowing them to wear underwear under a kilt.



click here


Wrong answer...

That's actually a later development of the going commando thing.

The reason men didn't wear anything underneath is not for the faint of heart, so quit reading now if you've a weak stomach.

The climate of the Highlands in Scotland and pretty much all of Ireland is very damp and rainy most of the time. The one fabric that was easily available in both countries was wool. (Around 300 years ago or so, in Ireland they started planting flax, but that was primarily used for the rich folks who could afford the finer fabrics.) So your basic Celt was wearing itchy, scratchy wool, which holds moisture. While some finer woolen weaves were available and could be used as underthings, they were still wool and they still chafed. So the skin gets irritated, and then it gets chafed and pretty soon the poor man's got crotch rot (AKA tinea cruris ) on his tender bits. Crotch rot is a nasty skin infection, and if a guy's lucky, his tackle itself will be spared. His backside, anus, perineum, inner thighs, and the area just above his tackle will be nasty, but his tackle would still work if they could get anyone close enough to er, play.


Even though crotch rot is more easily preventable these days, most guys who wear kilts will tell you that they're just more comfortable that way.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top