Permission To Be An Artist — Granted!

sweetnpetite

Intellectual snob
Joined
Jan 10, 2003
Posts
9,135
By Linda Dessau, the Self-Care Coach

Since I've been offering Artist Retreat Day programs, I've been hearing a lot about the concept of "permission". Some artists who said yes to a retreat day shared that this was a much-needed structure to enable and empower them to FINALLY give themselves permission to take time for their creative work.

Others just couldn't say yes, just couldn't give themselves permission.

What does it mean to have permission to do something? My thesaurus tells me that other words related to permission are: consent, sanctioning and authorization.

Consent signifies agreement, validation that what you're doing meets with specific expectations, criteria and guidelines. It sounds solemn and like someone has faith in you. Sanction is an even more formal declaration of acceptance and faith.

Authorized to Create
Authorization — well, that implies that you're something special. That not just anyone is meant to be painting this painting, writing this song or designing that jewelry. You have been specially authorized to do it.

And why? Because you have the unique gifts that are necessary to bring that creative project into being. Who authorized you? The same power that granted you those gifts and skills — whether you choose to think of that as God, the universe, Spirit, or another name. As we read in the Science of Getting Rich, we're not given the desire to do something without also giving you the skill to carry it out.

Why is it so difficult to authorize ourselves, grant ourselves permission and consent, to sanction our own creative work? Sometimes we seek this permission from others, unconsciously (or consciously) hoping they'll deny it, so we won't really have to venture into the scary world of living up to our potential.

A lot of these words symbolize that external permission is needed. And sometimes it is.

Permission from Others
Whether you want to attend an artist retreat day, meet a deadline or just develop a new idea that came to you overnight, you'll sometimes need permission from the people you share your life with to take the time for your creative work.

It might mean delegating household work or child-care or rescheduling a date or planned event. All of you might also need a willingness to be flexible and to accept that sometimes things don't get done right away. It also means ensuring an environment of support for your work.

Will others give you permission? Of course you can't control what anyone else thinks, says or does, but consider this: our loved ones will take cues from us about how serious our creative work is to us. If we're constantly putting it on the back burner, putting our work down, and letting it be the first thing to go when things get stressful or busy, we're teaching others to treat it the same way.

If we don't take our creative work seriously, why should they?

Permission from Self — Artist at Work
I think what's even more important is the permission we give ourselves. There are so many reasons we deny ourselves permission to pursue our creative work. Fear tops the list. Fear of success, fear of failure, fear of what people will think of us, fear of being good, fear of being terrible, or fear we'll let someone else down, to name a few examples.

Sometimes we hold on to earlier instances when we were denied permission, denied access, not sanctioned or authorized, or when our work was criticized or belittled. Some of us have even been told, directly, NOT to pursue our creative work ("don't give up your day job", "find another path", "you have no business doing this work"), which hung a big UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS sign on the door of our creative hearts.

So hang a new sign on your creative heart — one that reads "Artist at work". And in fine print, "This work has been sanctioned by _______" (the name of your source of Power).

10 Signs That You've Given Yourself Permission to be a Creative Artist
The first words out of your mouth when someone asks "and what do you do?" are "I'm a songwriter/artist/sculptor/writer, etc.".


You work steadily at your craft, whether it's working on or re-working pieces or promoting your work.


You teach your loved ones to treat your art seriously.


The materials and resources that you need to create with are part of your budget and are planned expenses every month.


You're committed to your learning, growth and development, participating in artists groups and discussion forums and seeking out mentorship and coaching.


You don't let mistakes or criticism stop you from taking your next steps.


You're building the resources you need to support yourself financially, emotionally and spiritually.


You're conscious of your physical lifestyle habits and choose the ones that won't interfere with your creative work.


You find opportunities to pass on your knowledge and support wherever possible, to someone who's had less experience than you have.


You consistently say no to requests for your time, energy and commitment that will take you away from your creative work. •
© Linda Dessau, 2005.

http://www.creativity-portal.com/bc/linda.dessau/permission.artist.html
 
I consider this article particularly timely because what is Nano if not permission we give ourselves to put our writing FIRST?
 
Sorry Sweets but your first post is possibly the biggest load of bollocks I've read in a long time. Any artist who needs a mental checklist authorising them to gear up for 'creativity' ain't going to produce anything worth a damn.

Most artists - in the broadest sense of usage - gear up for a project whether it be NaNo, painting, sculpture, photography, what you will; i don't know of any artist, and believe me I know many, who even begins to contemplate that kind 'tick-box' approach to commencing a project.

It may be a suitable set of considerations for individuals contemplating commencing a career as an artist but its value in 'freeing the spirit' is equivalent to slapping yourself with a wet fish.

Don't mean any offense, but it don't believe it should for one moment to taken seriously, if you ain't upto the task, the checklist will make damn all difference, except to the person selling the course.
 
Some people enjoy slapping themselves with a wet fish, or slapping others with a wet fish for that matter.
ART!
 
my take:

neonlyte said:
Sorry Sweets but your first post is possibly the biggest load of bollocks I've read in a long time. Any artist who needs a mental checklist authorising them to gear up for 'creativity' ain't going to produce anything worth a damn.

Most artists - in the broadest sense of usage - gear up for a project whether it be NaNo, painting, sculpture, photography, what you will; i don't know of any artist, and believe me I know many, who even begins to contemplate that kind 'tick-box' approach to commencing a project.

It may be a suitable set of considerations for individuals contemplating commencing a career as an artist but its value in 'freeing the spirit' is equivalent to slapping yourself with a wet fish.

Don't mean any offense, but it don't believe it should for one moment to taken seriously, if you ain't upto the task, the checklist will make damn all difference, except to the person selling the course.

I didn't read it at all like that. And I don't understand what you are talking about a checklist. the signs that you've given yourself permission, maybe? that's not a to-do list, at least I didn't read it as one. I read it as something to think about. Being an artist, allowing yourself to consider yourself an artist, taking yourself seriuosly as an artist- these things don't come easy to everybody.

I don't think the article is really granting permission (it's just a catchy title)- it's asking you- who are you waiting for permission from? I'm sure that there are many who would read that and realize that they have been waiting for permision without even knowing it, and then they might say, "hey, I"m an adult, I'm my own person, I'll grant my own damn permission."

No, fully realized artists don't need this article. But there are many artists (and would be artists) who aren't fully realized yet.
 
an example of what I mean:

Will others give you permission? Of course you can't control what anyone else thinks, says or does, but consider this: our loved ones will take cues from us about how serious our creative work is to us. If we're constantly putting it on the back burner, putting our work down, and letting it be the first thing to go when things get stressful or busy, we're teaching others to treat it the same way.
 
My problem with this treatise is the notion of 'Negotiation of Consent' whether it be to yourself or those you share your life with.

Artists are the most selfish of bastards. They operate under a total premise of self belief, self confidence, blind ambition and are prepared to trample over anyone who gets in their way. I believe writers may be marginally less aggresive - I'm talking about 'fine art' and the artists who produce it.

We've had this, or similar, discussions before on Lit, Creativity and Madness. Most artists - people who get their work into exhibition - will resort to any lengths to achieve their aim. I've seen tantrums, I've worked days without sleep satisfying the demands of artists. I've just produced a video for an exhibition for an artist, took the best part of ten days, each day they wanted changes to what had been agreed the day before, the DVD was finally burnt overnight before the artist flew out. You might ask why I would put myself through that effort, it's because what is being produced is great work and artists need people like me help them realise their ambition.

In September I co-organised an exhibition for 18 international artists. It was a great success, I made five overseas trips, was there three days before the exhibition opened organising accommodation, taxis from airports, hanging the show etc. I haven't received one thank you note from any of the artists, but I know I put on a damn good exhibition and I've 25 schools doing follow-up work on the exhibition, the concepts, the philosophy and the relationship between art and community.

I take huge exception to people proclaiming that following a set of guidelines, giving yourself permission, negotiating the permission of others will allow you to be an artist. An artist does not seek the permission of anyone to be creative and treat the fools who try to impose conditions upon them with contempt.

As we read in the Science of Getting Rich, we're not given the desire to do something without also giving you the skill to carry it out.

This sentence from your post just about sums up the authors philosophy, she's out to make money and need gullible people who think they might like to be "an artist" to help her get there.
 
neonlyte said:
My problem with this treatise is the notion of 'Negotiation of Consent' whether it be to yourself or those you share your life with.

Artists are the most selfish of bastards. They operate under a total premise of self belief, self confidence, blind ambition and are prepared to trample over anyone who gets in their way. I believe writers may be marginally less aggresive - I'm talking about 'fine art' and the artists who produce it.

I think we are just going to have to disagree here:) Firstly, I don't think that artists are the most selfish of bastards, not at all. Secondly, I *am* refering to artists of all types, not just the fine arts but all creative peoples- and I think that's what the article is talking about as well. Finally, I think that everyone is different, some people don't feel they need 'permission' to do something for themselves, some do. [particularly, in my opinion, women who are mainly raised and expected to think of others first]

If only selfish people can be artists, I think that art itself is going to suffer. Who wants art that is only a reflection of someone elses selfishness? Not I. Even if i did, if that was the extent of it, wouldn't art end up being both extremely shallow and narrow and empty? I cannot believe that artists are all 'the most selfish of bastards' [or shall we say 'true artists' anyway]

And I'd also like to add that I think that the idea of 'giving yourself permission' really is another way of saying that you don't need permission. It's just phrased to appeal to a different group of people.

Not everybody with tallent and message starts out life fearless. I don't think this negates them as "true artists" Last i heard, artists hd to grow and develop like the rest of us, and for some that might include overcoming internal and external barriers like the need for approval or concent.
 
Alessia Brio said:
Because I'm good enough. I'm smart enough. And, gosh darnit, people like me.
After Neon's, my fave post here. I too think the original post quote is crappola at heart, and a lucrative heart it probably is ;) .

I'm not going to bother naming the first dozen great artists (in many fields) that come to mind who anyone would label 'selfish' (or bastard, asshole, bitch, etc.) "Art" is all about self-expression (not saving whales or AIDS patients). And I am not using the term 'selfish' vis-à-vis morality; an artist needs have more self regard than not. Even Emily Dickinson was selfish in her reclusiveness.

No argument desired, just saying.

Perdita

p.s. Ok, here're a few: R. Wagner, J. Joyce, W. Shakespeare, L. v.Beethoven, J. Pollack, P. Picasso
 
perdita said:
"Art" is all about self-expression (not saving whales or AIDS patients).

Well, I think that might be the crux of it right there. Everyone has there opinion on what art is and what is art. And no one seems to agree.:) Certainly there are many that would except a broader definition that 'self-expression' only.

Aditionally, we could all argue about what self means too. :devil: I mean, didn't the transendentalists hold that everything was connected, that all was 1 and that god was in everything? In that case, saving the wales and aids patients are just as much a part of the artist as his/her own hand. At least, as far as that artist is concerned.

In any event, you are expressing what you yourself think about these topics. Self-expression isn't limited to expressions only about yourself.
 
dark-glasses said:
I think that is incorrect.
Art is self-expression, but self-expression is not necessarily Art...just as a square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is not necessarily a square.

That is why we have a word "Art" ..to distinguish a finer, more communicative form of self-expression.

all writing is not literature. Though all writing is also self-expression.
Good Morning Dark Glasses!
I hope you are well.
i would not even think of getting into this discussion, but I don't get to see you that often, so I thought I would say HI!

Thanks again for your great work.

GGRRRRRRRR!
 
The question she's really sidestepping in this article is the one I think we all wrestle with: Is what I'm doing worthwhile or just self-indulgent crap?

And that's too often a question we can't answer for ourselves.
 
dr_mabeuse said:
The question she's really sidestepping in this article is the one I think we all wrestle with: Is what I'm doing worthwhile or just self-indulgent crap?

And that's too often a question we can't answer for ourselves.
Worthwhile to whom? Isn't the fact that it has value to you enough? I mean, realistically, or perhaps fatalistically, couldn't that question be asked about every breath you take, every action?
 
yui said:
Worthwhile to whom? Isn't the fact that it has value to you enough? I mean, realistically, or perhaps fatalistically, couldn't that question be asked about every breath you take, every action?

Not for me. I know there are a lot of people here who say they write just for themselves, but to me writing is all about communication, and if a story falls in the forest with no one around, it doesn't make a sound. It's a two-person process, requiring a writer and a reader. If I write something I think is great but it falls on deaf ears or doesn't do anything for people, then I think it's a failure, and if I fail consistently to reach people, than I'm going to think I'm wasting my time writing.

I think it's probably different for a lot of other arts. You can certainly dance for your own pleasure, or paint, or do crafts and take photos, but writing demands more of its audience than any other art. It's all about communication to me.
 
sweetnpetite said:
Self-expression isn't limited to expressions only about yourself.
Or course not. I did not presume anyone would think I meant self-expression equalled autobiographical matters, or even the personal. But if an artist is passionate about whatever she is working on it needs spring from one's self. A definition of self? Up for grabs. P.
 
dr_mabeuse said:
The question she's really sidestepping in this article is the one I think we all wrestle with: Is what I'm doing worthwhile or just self-indulgent crap?

And that's too often a question we can't answer for ourselves.

well, from the definitions above, one might think that all art is is self indulgent crap.
 
Back
Top