Pennsylvania Settles Election Integrity Lawsuit

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
61,932

Pennsylvania Settles Election Integrity Lawsuit, Deletes 178,000 Names From Voter Rolls​


By Bill Pan
May 11, 2023Updated: May 11, 2023

Pennsylvania has settled a federal election integrity lawsuit, saying that it has removed more than 178,000 ineligible voter registrations and promising greater transparency in its future housekeeping efforts.

As part of its settlement with conservative legal group Judicial Watch, Pennsylvania and several of its counties will publish information related to voter registration, including the total number of active voters; total number of inactive voters; and total number of voters removed from the voter rolls due to death, failure to respond to an address confirmation notice, and failure to vote in the two most recent federal general elections.

These statistics will be published on June 30 every year on the Pennsylvania Department of State’s website for the next five years, Judicial Watch said.

The federal lawsuit was originally brought in April 2020 against Pennsylvania and the counties of Bucks, Chester, and Delaware. In the complaint, Judicial Watch noted that the three counties removed a total of just 17 names in the most recent two-year reporting period, despite having a combined voter roll of 1.2 million.

More here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/penns...utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=BonginoReport

It's about time.
 
“Right”guide and “Judicial watch” got a pat on the head and a lollipop.

👍

👉 “Right”guide and “Judicial Watch” 🤣

🇺🇸
 
It's about time.
I like how you say this as if you've been closely monitoring Pennsylvanian voting metrics over decades or whatever rather than just finding something on your daily aggregate newsfeed hunt to post up. :ROFLMAO:
 
Cool 👍

The only people that care are the ones who believe it matters. I'm still on rolls in other states
 
My thoughts on this are that voter rolls should be completely purged 9 months after every election. If an election challenge cannot come to fruition in 9 months, it's stillborn and any evidence can be tossed. Every voter should be REQUIRED to reregister for each and every election regardless if they've voted previously in that district. This should be done at a minimum of 4 months prior to the election so that the commissioner can verify the voter's eligibility.

Those simple changes solve almost all of the election issues we have. But then, they're solutions and no politician likes actual solutions because they don't help them win reelection.
 
My thoughts on this are that voter rolls should be completely purged 9 months after every election. If an election challenge cannot come to fruition in 9 months, it's stillborn and any evidence can be tossed. Every voter should be REQUIRED to reregister for each and every election regardless if they've voted previously in that district. This should be done at a minimum of 4 months prior to the election so that the commissioner can verify the voter's eligibility.

Those simple changes solve almost all of the election issues we have. But then, they're solutions and no politician likes actual solutions because they don't help them win reelection.
Certainly you have the right to lobby for election law changes within your state. Good luck
 
Pennsylvania "They said."

Anyone can "say" anything, which is why I wondered what proof was produced.
This was a case in Federal District Court I would think it would be easy to prove or disprove if those inactive names have not been removed from the voter rolls. I assume they are asserting to the court that they either have or are in the process of doing so.
 
Nobody with intelligence is saying that 178K people voted fraudulently, it's just obsolete entries from people moving house.

Much like Trump living in Washington or in Florida but voting in New York. Now that was fraudulent.
 
Back
Top