Paternity Fraud: One small victory for a man duped. Feminists burn bras in protest!

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-wifes-children-awarded-25K--bereavement.html

Husband tricked into believing wife's children were his own awarded £25K - for 'bereavement': Devoted 'father' deceived for years until DNA tests revealed truth

A man who discovered that the son and daughter he raised into their teenage years were not his has been awarded £25,000 in damages after suing his ex-wife for deceit.

Richard Rodwell was a loving father to Adam and Laura until his marriage to their mother Helen broke down.

After the divorce he paid regular child maintenance for more than four years, from his salary as a factory manager.

But in 2008 Mr Rodwell ordered DNA tests after hearing rumours about his daughter’s paternity – and the results showed that each child was fathered by a different man.

 

[LiFeNdEaTh]

thanks for sharing

 

[BotanyBoy]

I'm surprised they didn't tell him

 

[LiFeNdEaTh]

I'm surprised they didn't tell him

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I'm surprised they didn't tell him

He dealt with it... by winning his case!

 

[about_average]

So where is the feminist bra burning in protest? Or is that just more shit you make up?

Minor news story, woman fucked man over and gets just deserts. Pretty straight forward.

 

[warrior queen]

This works better if the man who was the father for all those years demands a paternity test based on rumours.... and then discovers the child was his all along.
Like what happened to me.
Turns out, a mother can sue for 'emotional damage' done to both her and the child!
Gotta love justice

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

So where is the feminist bra burning in protest? Or is that just more shit you make up?

Minor news story, woman fucked man over and gets just deserts. Pretty straight forward.

If Richard Daily or Badbabysitter were to see this thread you would bear witness to exactly of what I speak.

Or you get people like Warrior Queen who turns it all around to portray herself as the victim...

 

[warrior queen]

If Richard Daily or Badbabysitter were to see this thread you would bear witness to exactly of what I speak.

Or you get people like Warrior Queen who turns it all around to portray herself as the victim...

Oh, I am so not a victim here!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Oh, I am so not a victim here!

No, this is a thread about men being victimized by paternity fraud. You implied that this wasn't as bad as you being accused of duping your ex-husband.

Considering that women often do defraud their husbands by having another man's kid, you shouldn't have gotten anything from that incident. Every man, everywhere, has automatic probable cause to get a paternity test, they have had probable cause since humans first fell from grace. It matters not the species, race, culture, nationality, or time period: probable cause and suspicion of paternity fraud is written right into the genome of all mammals.

Paternity tests should be done at birth, and it should be mandatory.

You wouldn't have anything to hide... would you?

 

[warrior queen]

No, this is a thread about men being victimized by paternity fraud. You implied that this wasn't as bad as you being accused of duping your ex-husband.

Considering that women often do defraud their husbands by having another man's kid, you shouldn't have gotten anything from that incident. Every man, everywhere, has automatic probable cause to get a paternity test, they have had probable cause since humans first fell from grace. It matters not the species, race, culture, nationality, or time period: probable cause and suspicion of paternity fraud is written right into the genome of all mammals.

Paternity tests should be done at birth, and it should be mandatory.

You wouldn't have anything to hide... would you?

Not hiding a thing, dear.
The bastard got his tests, and he lost.
Now he pays.

My point here is that putting kids through an emotional wringer (teens, in this case), because you don't want to pay a few bucks in support of what you raised as your own, can sometimes have the complete opposite result to what you expected [hoped for].

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Not hiding a thing, dear.
The bastard got his tests, and he lost.
Now he pays.

My point here is that putting kids through an emotional wringer (teens, in this case), because you don't want to pay a few bucks in support of what you raised as your own, can sometimes have the complete opposite result to what you expected [hoped for].

And sometimes it doesn't.

And... "a few bucks"? It's only a few bucks until he leaves the country or dies, and then you have to do it all on your lonesome. Then it becomes real money doesn't it?

I bet you'll say $40,000 is a "few bucks", right?

http://www.australianpaternityfraud.org/news/AP_Korean_Man_Wins_Paternity_Fraud_Lawsuit.htm

SEOUL, South Korea -- A South Korean court ordered a woman to pay her husband $42,380 in compensation for having a baby with another man, a judge said Monday.

The 26-year-old woman told her husband in February 2002 she was pregnant with his baby, and demanded that they marry. The baby was born in November 2002.

"The man had used condoms whenever they had sex, but he agreed to marry, thinking that one of the condoms didn't work," said Hong Joong-pyo, a judge at the Seoul Family Court.

But the man's suspicion grew when relatives complained that "the baby didn't look like him at all," Hong said.

When the husband confronted his wife with a DNA test that showed the baby was not his, the woman argued that the baby must have been switched at hospital. When the husband moved to sue the hospital, the woman confessed to having been pregnant with another man's baby, Hong said.

Hong also nullified the marriage in his ruling Thursday.

The wife said she was sexually assaulted by the baby's real father, but the court rejected her argument for lack of evidence.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Just had to post this because it's going to piss the feminists off even more.

http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southeast/2012/10/03/265322.htm

The Tennessee Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a man who was misled into thinking he was a father and ordered the child’s mother to reimburse him more than $25,000 for child support, medical expenses and insurance premiums he had paid.

In a unanimous ruling, the court said Tennessee law allows a former spouse to pursue a fraud claim against a mother who intentionally misrepresented the identity of a child’s biological father.

Just a few bucks, LOL!!!

 

[warrior queen]

Just a few bucks, LOL!!!

It's got nothing to do with the $.
Never does.
It's about who can hurt who more.
And the only ones who really end up hurt, are those kids that were raised by a loving parent for 'x' number of years, suddenly learning it wasn't ever about love after all.

 

[phrodeau]

Le Jerque probably tried to sue his wife for the money he paid for the kid they adopted from Nigeria.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

It's got nothing to do with the $.
Never does.
It's about who can hurt who more.
And the only ones who really end up hurt, are those kids that were raised by a loving parent for 'x' number of years, suddenly learning it wasn't ever about love after all.

What you meant to say was "I'm a woman, and I'm entitled to fuck my husband over and defend my epic dishonesty and betrayal by guilt tripping him with 'remember when you didn't realize I duped you and you loved the kid as your own?' Now hand over your fucking money you punk!"

Be honest, what's what you meant.

 

[Disgustipated]

Be honest, what's what you meant.

What?!

 

[MissMaidenMinx]

Personally I think these rulings are excellent. These rulings don't necessarily mean the 'fathers' are going to stop loving said kids. It's compensation for being lied to, discovering that their genes haven't been passed on and then there is the financial aspect. I imagine it would be emotionally devastating discovery.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Personally I think these rulings are excellent. These rulings don't necessarily mean the 'fathers' are going to stop loving said kids. It's compensation for being lied to, discovering that their genes haven't been passed on and then there is the financial aspect. I imagine it would be emotionally devastating discovery.

Right on the mark.

 

[warrior queen]

Personally I think these rulings are excellent. These rulings don't necessarily mean the 'fathers' are going to stop loving said kids. It's compensation for being lied to, discovering that their genes haven't been passed on and then there is the financial aspect. I imagine it would be emotionally devastating discovery.

The ones who get hurt the most are the kids.

 

[warrior queen]

What you meant to say was "I'm a woman, and I'm entitled to fuck my husband over and defend my epic dishonesty and betrayal by guilt tripping him with 'remember when you didn't realize I duped you and you loved the kid as your own?' Now hand over your fucking money you punk!"

Be honest, what's what you meant.

Bullshit.
I would never, ever do that!
Not because of the guy - because the kids would eventually end up getting hurt.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Bullshit.
I would never, ever do that!
Not because of the guy - because the kids would eventually end up getting hurt.

But your argument unambiguously justifies other women who do screw over their husbands like that.

"You loved your kid before, didn't you? So who cares if I cheated on you and you're stuck supporting a man's kid.. you're a male! PAY UP!"

That was your message. Own it.

 

[warrior queen]

But your argument unambiguously justifies other women who do screw over their husbands like that.

"You loved your kid before, didn't you? So who cares if I cheated on you and you're stuck supporting a man's kid.. you're a male! PAY UP!"

That was your message. Own it.

No, it doesn't.
If a man has the thought that kids may not be his, fine - do something about it.
But make damn sure whichever way you go about it doesn't rip the world from under the kids.

 

[MissMaidenMinx]

The ones who get hurt the most are the kids.

The discovery that their mum is a lying whore would hurt any child.

Don't get me wrong, since you have decided to only look at this from one angle, in your case your ex has proven himself to be an arsehole and that obviously hurt your boy, which is sad. At least your boy learnt that young. I imagine it's been hard on you having to pick up the pieces.

 

[warrior queen]

The discovery that their mum is a lying whore would hurt any child.

Don't get me wrong, since you have decided to only look at this from one angle, in your case your ex has proven himself to be an arsehole and that obviously hurt your boy, which is sad. At least your boy learnt that young. I imagine it's been hard on you having to pick up the pieces.

I have been trying to point out, in my usual clumsy way, that any child caught up in a situation like this is the only real one who gets hurt/damaged.
The lying mother, and the duped father, are both much more able to handle the fallout.

Why would any parent push this issue on a teen? They have enough angst going on without having their parental security fucked up as well.

Either do the test when the kids are young, or wait till they're old enough to handle the emotional fallout a little better.