shereads
Sloganless
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2003
- Posts
- 19,242
Okay, I'll bite. Let's set aside any suspicion that Diebold, Inc., was chosen to supply Florida's snazzy new touch-screen voting machines because of their financial support of Gov. Jeb Bush and his older brother. Let's pretend there was a fair and impartial bidding process during which, for some reason, none of the competing firms was able to provide machines that leave a paper trail.
And of course, let's take it for granted that a Diebold board member was making a joke when he told guests at a Republican fundraiser, "Diebold guarantees that George W. Bush will carry Florida."
Haha!
Stolen-election jokes from Florida Republicans have remained a bright spot during these dark times. Group hug.
Still...l have to wonder why Automatic Teller Machines are able to produce a paper receipt if the technology is too sophisticated for a voting application.
Would you use a bank that couldn't provide you with a receipt for your deposits?
I woudn't either.
But today I deposited my vote, which is worth substantially more than my checking balance, into a machine that might have been on its coffee break or surfing porn for all I know. It felt wrong.
Wrong and eerie. As if a disembodied voice were about to call out, "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"
Four years ago, we Floridians asked our state and local boards of election to accomplish one thing: drag our voting system into the 1990s with something more accurate and reliable than paper ballots.
Foolishly, we forgot that when your genie grants a wish, phrasing is everything. We should have said, "A paper trail is essential in case something goes wrong with the machines." It seemed to go without saying. Until the Diebold contract was made public.
Today we were supposed to be reassured by a press release stating that the machines are being spot-tested throughout the day, using a scripted mini-vote that will determine whether votes are being accurately counted.
Great!
I asked a poll watcher from Florida Voters' Rights what happens if a machine is shown to be inaccurate.
"They'll replace it with a backup machine," she said.
"What about all the voters that have already cast their votes on that machine?"
"They're screwed," she told me.
No paper trail. No evidence.
Not that there's any reason to fear abuse of the system. Florida has lost entire children from state custody. As busy as they are looking for those kids, they won't have time to misplace my vote.
I reviewed my votes on the screen and pressed "Vote" as instructed. The screen went blank. I'm 70% convinced that it's supposed to happen that way. The other 30% is still wondering if my virtual ballot disappeared into the virtual lockbox, with none of its chads hanging...or if it just disappeared.
On the plus side, I'm 99% sure that I didn't accidentally vote for Pat Buchanan.
And of course, let's take it for granted that a Diebold board member was making a joke when he told guests at a Republican fundraiser, "Diebold guarantees that George W. Bush will carry Florida."
Haha!
Still...l have to wonder why Automatic Teller Machines are able to produce a paper receipt if the technology is too sophisticated for a voting application.
Would you use a bank that couldn't provide you with a receipt for your deposits?
I woudn't either.
But today I deposited my vote, which is worth substantially more than my checking balance, into a machine that might have been on its coffee break or surfing porn for all I know. It felt wrong.
Wrong and eerie. As if a disembodied voice were about to call out, "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"
Four years ago, we Floridians asked our state and local boards of election to accomplish one thing: drag our voting system into the 1990s with something more accurate and reliable than paper ballots.
Foolishly, we forgot that when your genie grants a wish, phrasing is everything. We should have said, "A paper trail is essential in case something goes wrong with the machines." It seemed to go without saying. Until the Diebold contract was made public.
Today we were supposed to be reassured by a press release stating that the machines are being spot-tested throughout the day, using a scripted mini-vote that will determine whether votes are being accurately counted.
Great!
I asked a poll watcher from Florida Voters' Rights what happens if a machine is shown to be inaccurate.
"They'll replace it with a backup machine," she said.
"What about all the voters that have already cast their votes on that machine?"
"They're screwed," she told me.
No paper trail. No evidence.
Not that there's any reason to fear abuse of the system. Florida has lost entire children from state custody. As busy as they are looking for those kids, they won't have time to misplace my vote.
I reviewed my votes on the screen and pressed "Vote" as instructed. The screen went blank. I'm 70% convinced that it's supposed to happen that way. The other 30% is still wondering if my virtual ballot disappeared into the virtual lockbox, with none of its chads hanging...or if it just disappeared.
On the plus side, I'm 99% sure that I didn't accidentally vote for Pat Buchanan.
Last edited: