the_traveler
Experienced
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2001
- Posts
- 45
Hi....
I’m looking for a girl, for just simple cybersex..
gic: maybe we're going about this the wrong way
bic: FINALLY some sense.
the_traveler: what do u mean?
gic: i don't know maybe the approach is all wrong.
bic: I’m saying the whole idea is wrong!, but does anyone listen, NOOO!
doctor: it is theoretically possible to scan though similar ads, pick the ones most viewable, look for commonalities and attempt create a similar message composed of the parameters we find, however it would consume a considerable amount of resources.
the_traveler: not the mention the fact that it wouldn't be original, which was we agreed upon in the first place.
bic: ORIGINAL!, ha! u can never be original.
the_traveler: u sounds like u might have some actual facts to go along this statement.
gic: oh, don't get him started.
bic: ok, let's start from the basics, we agree that envioment contains a finite number of known objects that can reference right?
gic: man, u weren't kidding when u said basics.
the_traveler
k.
doctor: known to us, or to known to anyone?
bic: to anyone. And because the number of objects is finite there can be only a finite number creative lines stemming from them, right?
doctor: not necessarily, we can devise objects which do not exists in reality, thus greatly increasing the number of possible creative lines.
bic: oof!, always the smart ass, i mean BASE objects.
doctor: oh I see what u mean, objects which can not be more simplified in the human language, thus making them the building blocks of every other statement, reaching a constant number of combinations created from those objects.
bic: thank u, not let's narrow the scope here, to sexual context alone. if we take into account the amount of motivation which drove the human race to come up with a really creative lines for such a thing (and thus getting laid more often) we find that it's probably almost impossible to find a combination which has not be used. Also including the fact that u do not have enough data to cover all other possible objects regarding this area, we arrive to the final conclusion, that u can not create a line that someone else hadn't thought of already.
the_traveler:, ok, ok, I believe u but u'r missing the point completely.
bic: oh yea, what's that?
the_traveler: I wanted to come up with something that would be original to me. i didn't want to imitate someone else. if i sound like me, it's enough, no matter if i happen to sound like someone else as well.
bic: wait-a-minute let get me this straight, u ready for a girl to think that u are not original, just as long as u think u are? Excuse me that's just stupid.!
the_traveler: no it's not. let's say we do scan the messages like doc says, we come with a good line, and a girl sees it and likes us, I mean me. if that girl continues to talk me, she would surely notice some inconsistencies s between the phrasing of that line and myself, thus discovering the fact that I didn't write the line, I would rather have a girl to dislike me for who I am then to like for who i am not.
bic: hmm by the lack of replies I think u got your wish.
the_traveler: hmm, maybe.., maybe not.
I’m looking for a girl, for just simple cybersex..
gic: maybe we're going about this the wrong way
bic: FINALLY some sense.
the_traveler: what do u mean?
gic: i don't know maybe the approach is all wrong.
bic: I’m saying the whole idea is wrong!, but does anyone listen, NOOO!
doctor: it is theoretically possible to scan though similar ads, pick the ones most viewable, look for commonalities and attempt create a similar message composed of the parameters we find, however it would consume a considerable amount of resources.
the_traveler: not the mention the fact that it wouldn't be original, which was we agreed upon in the first place.
bic: ORIGINAL!, ha! u can never be original.
the_traveler: u sounds like u might have some actual facts to go along this statement.
gic: oh, don't get him started.
bic: ok, let's start from the basics, we agree that envioment contains a finite number of known objects that can reference right?
gic: man, u weren't kidding when u said basics.
the_traveler
k.doctor: known to us, or to known to anyone?
bic: to anyone. And because the number of objects is finite there can be only a finite number creative lines stemming from them, right?
doctor: not necessarily, we can devise objects which do not exists in reality, thus greatly increasing the number of possible creative lines.
bic: oof!, always the smart ass, i mean BASE objects.
doctor: oh I see what u mean, objects which can not be more simplified in the human language, thus making them the building blocks of every other statement, reaching a constant number of combinations created from those objects.
bic: thank u, not let's narrow the scope here, to sexual context alone. if we take into account the amount of motivation which drove the human race to come up with a really creative lines for such a thing (and thus getting laid more often) we find that it's probably almost impossible to find a combination which has not be used. Also including the fact that u do not have enough data to cover all other possible objects regarding this area, we arrive to the final conclusion, that u can not create a line that someone else hadn't thought of already.
the_traveler:, ok, ok, I believe u but u'r missing the point completely.
bic: oh yea, what's that?
the_traveler: I wanted to come up with something that would be original to me. i didn't want to imitate someone else. if i sound like me, it's enough, no matter if i happen to sound like someone else as well.
bic: wait-a-minute let get me this straight, u ready for a girl to think that u are not original, just as long as u think u are? Excuse me that's just stupid.!
the_traveler: no it's not. let's say we do scan the messages like doc says, we come with a good line, and a girl sees it and likes us, I mean me. if that girl continues to talk me, she would surely notice some inconsistencies s between the phrasing of that line and myself, thus discovering the fact that I didn't write the line, I would rather have a girl to dislike me for who I am then to like for who i am not.
bic: hmm by the lack of replies I think u got your wish.
the_traveler: hmm, maybe.., maybe not.
