Oral Sex - Cut or Uncut decision

Mercury_Maniac

imaginary
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Posts
9,821
ok so i've seen a few threads recently about the topic of circumcision and how it is frowned upon by most women when a guy is uncut, they claim they wouldn't turn down sex with the guy but would prefer him cut.



Now from a different stand point, would you go down on a man that is uncut? or is that strictly a no-no unless he is circumcised because he seems to be cleaner?
 
I don't have an issue with either.

As long as when I pull back the skin he doesn't have smegma or anything else disgusting.

Cleanliness is good :)

Oral is great :D
 
Mercury_Maniac said:
any reason why?


I'd say it's a perception of more cleanliness for cut, whether justified in reality or not. Honestly, giving bj's has never really been my favorite thing. I tend only to give them when I am way tipsy. lol
 
flirty_but_nice said:
I'd say it's a perception of more cleanliness for cut, whether justified in reality or not. Honestly, giving bj's has never really been my favorite thing. I tend only to give them when I am way tipsy. lol



well if you have a couple more drinks you won't even tell the difference :)
 
i dont really mind aslong as i know the guy is very clean like my bf is not cut but i still go down on him because i know he showers daily and is a very clean guy
x :cathappy:
 
Just wanted to say i prefer an uncut guy... smoother skin... shiny... silky.... more precum.. and a guy is supposed to taste like MAN... not soap. LOL
 
tenedaveslilslut said:

A man who's cut can be unclean just as much as an uncut man if they do not shower enough. It makes no difference to me as long as either man is clean. Although i have never been with an uncut man, i would prefer it over a cut man because i have heard that an uncut man is much more sensative to the stimulation given him and since giving head is one of my favorite things, i very much want him to enjoy every bit of stimulation i can give him. :devil: :p

:rose:


i like the way you think :)
 
tenedaveslilslut said:

A man who's cut can be unclean just as much as an uncut man if they do not shower enough. It makes no difference to me as long as either man is clean. Although i have never been with an uncut man, i would prefer it over a cut man because i have heard that an uncut man is much more sensative to the stimulation given him and since giving head is one of my favorite things, i very much want him to enjoy every bit of stimulation i can give him. :devil: :p

:rose:

You have really confused me.

How can you say you prefer something, but you have never experienced it?

That makes no sense to me.

A preference is something you have tried and like over other things.

Why not blow an uncut man and then you have something to compare it with and decide if you really do prefer it?

I can't help but wonder if Tenadave is thrilled to hear you would prefer an uncut man over his cock.
 
I think it doesn't matter, so long as hygiene is good - but hey - surely if a guy's hygiene is below par, you ain't gonna get that far, are you? ;)

A glans that has been protected from the world tends to be more sensitive when it emerges, so the response may be wilder.... :devil:
 
tenedaveslilslut said:

Don't know why the confusion...i don't need to try it to to know that i would prefer uncut as i have already explained that i have heard that an uncut man is much more sensative to the stimulation given him and since giving head is one of my favorite things, i very much want him to enjoy every bit of stimulation i can give him. And since Master tenedave is an uncut man i really don't think he will have a problem with my preference, as it was His cock i was referring too anyhow. :D

:rose:

I give up.

You posted in this thread that you had never had an uncut cock.

Now you tell us your Master is uncut.

Are you saying you have never had him?

I think I need to bow out of this complicated thread, and your complicated posts; before I end up saying things I have no wish to think or type.
 
Cut Or Uncut?

"Whatever it is, is the way I'd take it!""I'm (USED) to "CUT" so "UNCUT" TURNS me on!Isn't that the way it "USUALLY" is, What you don't have is what you want?
 
Three things I wondered while reading through this thread:


1.) Can you logically be Gung-Ho about something you've never experienced?

2.) What makes foreskin a significant enough matter to be a preference or even a deal-breaker?

3.) How is a filthy, smelly, encrusted circumcised dick more appealing than a filthy, smelly, encrusted uncircumcised dick?
 
Lurnk said:
Three things I wondered while reading through this thread:


1.) Can you logically be Gung-Ho about something you've never experienced? I don't think you can

2.) What makes foreskin a significant enough matter to be a preference or even a deal-breaker? Not to me

3.) How is a filthy, smelly, encrusted circumcised dick more appealing than a filthy, smelly, encrusted uncircumcised dick? Both are disgusting!
 
Back
Top