Oops.

Next step: Cheney will tell FactCheck.org to go { ? }themselves.

  • copulate with

    Votes: 8 80.0%
  • sternly rebuke

    Votes: 2 20.0%

  • Total voters
    10

shereads

Sloganless
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Posts
19,242
Urging Fact-Checking, Cheney Got Site Wrong

By Dana Milbank
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 7, 2004; Page A08


Vice President Cheney dropped a dot-bomb Tuesday night when he inadvertently directed millions of viewers of the vice presidential debate to an Internet site critical of the Bush administration.

After Democratic nominee John Edwards raised some nasty allegations about Halliburton Corp., the company Cheney once ran, Cheney angrily responded to the "false" charges. "If you go, for example, to FactCheck.com, an independent Web site sponsored by the University of Pennsylvania, you can get the specific details with respect to Halliburton," he said.

But when people followed Cheney's instructions, they wound up at a site sponsored by administration antagonist George Soros. "Why we must not re-elect President Bush," the site blared. "President Bush is endangering our safety, hurting our vital interests, and undermining American values."

Evidently, Cheney meant to say FactCheck.org a site run by the Annenberg Public Policy Center. Instead, he directed the nation's attention to a Web site that refers people to sellers of dictionaries and encyclopedias -- at least at first. The company behind the site, Cayman Islands-based Name Administration Inc., which also owns sites such as Lipbalm.com and Antarctica.com, was quickly overwhelmed.

"Suddenly they had 48,000 hits in an hour, then 100 hits a second," said John Berryhill, a lawyer for the company. "They had a technical problem on their hands."

To avoid crashing, and to exact revenge on Cheney for causing it such grief, Name Administration decided to forward traffic to GeorgeSoros.com -- a site that could handle the traffic, was not soliciting funds and clearly wasn't tied to Bush. "And you got to admit it was kind of cute," Berryhill said.

Soros's Web site issued a statement saying it had nothing to do with the redirection of traffic. "We are as surprised as anyone," said Michael Vachon, Soros's chief of staff.

Gradually, people became aware of Cheney's mistake, and the White House transcript of the debate was annotated with the correct address. But, unfortunately for Cheney, FactCheck.org was not much more helpful than Soros in knocking down Edwards's charges.

Cheney "wrongly implied that we had rebutted allegations Edwards was making about what Cheney had done as chief executive officer of Halliburton," the Annenberg site wrote in a posting yesterday. "In fact, we did post an article pointing out that Cheney hasn't profited personally while in office from Halliburton's Iraq contracts, as falsely implied by a Kerry TV ad. But Edwards was talking about Cheney's responsibility for earlier Halliburton troubles. And in fact, Edwards was mostly right."
 
Last edited:
Or copulate sternly...

Good morning, sher. It's a sweet one, here. I have house guests, and they picked a great few days for it.

Checking facts on the 'net may not be the brightest idea, anyhow. There are sites which report UFO sightings as fact, for instance. And even earnest sites misquote or, even more often, mis-attribute quotes. The medium is as full of malarkey as any, maybe more so.

Wildcard brought up the teacher who got flak for the George and Laura picture as if it were put up on the wall with other presidents of the US, when that was never the case. The story was fictionalized into that form to induce anger, and it worked.

The newspapers are swamps of scrambled, distorted facts, and so is the tube. It can be difficult to ascertain what is happening at the best of times.

I've been the interviewee in the past. I've seen the story in the 'paper all distorted and screwed. Reporters are people; people don't pay attention or even understand what they're seeing. It doesn't have to be malicious. With earnest gobbledygook like that as a baseline, and a lot of websites who actually are malicious, it's important to cast around a little and use a bit of judgement.
 
cantdog said:
Or copulate sternly...


Um... thank you very much for planting the mental image of Dick Cheney copulating sternly. :eek: :mad:

I think I'll go off and find a quiet place to be violently ill. :(
 
Deeply sorry, deev. The imagination can be a terrible thing sometimes.
 
Don’t worry, CD.

Remember, Cheney is a Republican.

He only lusts after wealth and power.



Thank God!



Edited to Add:

Quick! Somebody check the fine print in the Patriot Act.
Make certain they are not trying to reinstated Droit du Seigneur.
 
Last edited:
Virtual_Burlesque said:
Remember, Cheney is a Republican.

He only lusts after wealth and power.
Is he copulating those sternly then?
 
cheerful_deviant said:
Um... thank you very much for planting the mental image of Dick Cheney copulating sternly. :eek: :mad:

I think I'll go off and find a quiet place to be violently ill. :(



And thank you, CD, for the double vision.

EWWWW.
 
Virtual_Burlesque said:
Don’t worry, CD.

Remember, Cheney is a Republican.

He only lusts after wealth and power.

So when he spawned, it was done in a petrie dish? That's a relief. Sort of.

Until I picture him being sent into a room with a cup and a copy of Fortune Magazine...

EWWWWW.
 
shereads said:
So when he spawned, it was done in a petrie dish? That's a relief. Sort of.

Until I picture him being sent into a room with a cup and a copy of Fortune Magazine...

EWWWWW.

Oh God.

Just sputtered my rum and coke.

:D
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
Oh God.

Just sputtered my rum and coke.



MathGirl used to do that to me two or three times a week. It's hell on the keyboard, but it clears the sinuses.
 
Me too, sweets. She was one of the people who got me hooked on the AH when I was a lurker. She could always be counted on for the unexpected smile. I'd be willing to sacrifice a noseful of Diet Coke for another few posts to the Dubious Dictionary.
 
shereads said:
Me too, sweets. She was one of the people who got me hooked on the AH when I was a lurker. She could always be counted on for the unexpected smile. I'd be willing to sacrifice a noseful of Diet Coke for another few posts to the Dubious Dictionary.

:)
 
Back
Top