JohnnyBrando99
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2014
- Posts
- 359
Closed
Last edited:
Only for Bored Wives over 35 to Explore their No Limits Filthy Slutty Cheating Side
- Thread starter JohnnyBrando99
- Start date
Fidelisani
Experienced
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Posts
- 81
Satyr
Prologue:
Satyr. The only reason I know to say that is because I was so astounded by the absurdity of this post that I couldn’t tear my eyes away. Considering you apparently won’t read any short responses, I assume you’ll indulge this one.
As intelligent as you’ve tried to sound, you gave yourself away right at the beginning by stating that your information came from “research,” as it seems any woman you might want actually knows the meaning of the term. Research involves a sample size that is actually representative of the population, which yours clearly is not. Regardless of that, your misguided attempt to “partially balance” the perceived situation is, in a word, pathetic. Any woman of any maturity whatsoever would read this post the same way I did – with equal parts disgust and humour.
While it’s obvious that you enjoy wordplay, it’s equally obvious that you are ignorant of how words demonstrate a person’s intelligence and ability to communicate effectively. I’m really not sure if you want a lot of dirty talk… oh, wait, you did mention that in paragraph 4, 5, 12, 15, 20, and 33. You are apparently ok with women who are viewed as respectable, decent, classy, conservative, proper, and ladylike, yet you expect this woman to speak and act like a dirty slut at all times. Apparently you’re looking for a woman with split personalities, which makes sense considering it’s quite likely that the only women you’ll attract with this insane post are those with a mental problem (no offense meant, ladies).
As for your five paragraphs on the words “pussy” and “cunt,” it is obvious that you think anyone who uses the word “pussy” is immature and ridiculous. Without writing a long dissertation on the subject, you once again proved your ignorance by making a sweeping assumption about women in the United States – that we are sexually suppressed and readily accept any level of obscene violence. I assure you that I, along with a large host of American women (particularly those here on Lit), are not at all sexually suppressed (perhaps proper research would have told you that) and we definitely do NOT accept violence in any way, shape, or form.
I found your reversal to your argument particularly curious. If you were to say ‘I want to fuck your cunt with my pussy or puppy,” my first question would be “why do you have a pussy if you’re a man;” my second would be, “why is there a puppy anywhere in this conversation?” I assume you mean you want to fuck a woman’s cunt with your dick, cock, meat, pole, bone, tool, wood, love muscle, shaft, Johnson, etc. However, if you plan to fuck a woman’s cunt with your pussy, perhaps your post belongs elsewhere.
It seems fairly certain that you would like to indulge this desired woman with a good amount of degradation and humiliation, and expect her to indulge you with the dirtiest language she can think of. Yet you are not interested in women who have a need for constant attention. This is curious, as I could see any woman without a need for attention to impress you as boring and rather unresponsive. I will grant you, however, that you are looking for a woman who doesn’t need self-recognition or praise, as you are clearly not a source of either. It does seem rather contradictory, however, that you concern yourself with warning readers of being an overblown narcissist. I hazard to guess I’m not the only one who read your post thinking that’s exactly what you are. Narcissists don’t want to be around other narcissists, though, so I guess there is some sense in that.
You indeed took time and effort to very clearly outline your sexual interests. Personally, I require both men and women I talk to on here to be very intelligent, and I admit I judge based on their use of the language. This is exactly why this post is so incredibly absurd. Anyone with good word usage would have simply said, “I’d like to meet a married 35+ woman interested in cheating on her husband by talking dirty and being degraded.”
Brevity is a virtue. Research it; I think you'll find it's quite effective in sexual contexts.
All that said, good luck on your search.
Prologue:
Satyr. The only reason I know to say that is because I was so astounded by the absurdity of this post that I couldn’t tear my eyes away. Considering you apparently won’t read any short responses, I assume you’ll indulge this one.
As intelligent as you’ve tried to sound, you gave yourself away right at the beginning by stating that your information came from “research,” as it seems any woman you might want actually knows the meaning of the term. Research involves a sample size that is actually representative of the population, which yours clearly is not. Regardless of that, your misguided attempt to “partially balance” the perceived situation is, in a word, pathetic. Any woman of any maturity whatsoever would read this post the same way I did – with equal parts disgust and humour.
While it’s obvious that you enjoy wordplay, it’s equally obvious that you are ignorant of how words demonstrate a person’s intelligence and ability to communicate effectively. I’m really not sure if you want a lot of dirty talk… oh, wait, you did mention that in paragraph 4, 5, 12, 15, 20, and 33. You are apparently ok with women who are viewed as respectable, decent, classy, conservative, proper, and ladylike, yet you expect this woman to speak and act like a dirty slut at all times. Apparently you’re looking for a woman with split personalities, which makes sense considering it’s quite likely that the only women you’ll attract with this insane post are those with a mental problem (no offense meant, ladies).
As for your five paragraphs on the words “pussy” and “cunt,” it is obvious that you think anyone who uses the word “pussy” is immature and ridiculous. Without writing a long dissertation on the subject, you once again proved your ignorance by making a sweeping assumption about women in the United States – that we are sexually suppressed and readily accept any level of obscene violence. I assure you that I, along with a large host of American women (particularly those here on Lit), are not at all sexually suppressed (perhaps proper research would have told you that) and we definitely do NOT accept violence in any way, shape, or form.
I found your reversal to your argument particularly curious. If you were to say ‘I want to fuck your cunt with my pussy or puppy,” my first question would be “why do you have a pussy if you’re a man;” my second would be, “why is there a puppy anywhere in this conversation?” I assume you mean you want to fuck a woman’s cunt with your dick, cock, meat, pole, bone, tool, wood, love muscle, shaft, Johnson, etc. However, if you plan to fuck a woman’s cunt with your pussy, perhaps your post belongs elsewhere.
It seems fairly certain that you would like to indulge this desired woman with a good amount of degradation and humiliation, and expect her to indulge you with the dirtiest language she can think of. Yet you are not interested in women who have a need for constant attention. This is curious, as I could see any woman without a need for attention to impress you as boring and rather unresponsive. I will grant you, however, that you are looking for a woman who doesn’t need self-recognition or praise, as you are clearly not a source of either. It does seem rather contradictory, however, that you concern yourself with warning readers of being an overblown narcissist. I hazard to guess I’m not the only one who read your post thinking that’s exactly what you are. Narcissists don’t want to be around other narcissists, though, so I guess there is some sense in that.
You indeed took time and effort to very clearly outline your sexual interests. Personally, I require both men and women I talk to on here to be very intelligent, and I admit I judge based on their use of the language. This is exactly why this post is so incredibly absurd. Anyone with good word usage would have simply said, “I’d like to meet a married 35+ woman interested in cheating on her husband by talking dirty and being degraded.”
Brevity is a virtue. Research it; I think you'll find it's quite effective in sexual contexts.
All that said, good luck on your search.
Lady_Artemis
Experienced
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2009
- Posts
- 31
That...
...was awesome. I haven't seen a man get his ass delivered to him so eloquently in ages. Standing ovation, Fidelisani.
...was awesome. I haven't seen a man get his ass delivered to him so eloquently in ages. Standing ovation, Fidelisani.
BellwetherLady
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2014
- Posts
- 191
I agree! A great response!
JohnnyBrando99
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2014
- Posts
- 359
Closed
Last edited:
Fidelisani
Experienced
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Posts
- 81
Director's Cut
Bravo for the even longer post. Forgive me for not reading the whole thing, as you sent me the "director's cut" via PM.
As I said in my PM reply, I can't possibly address all of this. But you did issue a challenge:
"I will highlight the last sentence which hopefully does finally get through to you just how much I am aware of the importance of the usage of words as one indicator of general intelligence: 'I require women to be very intelligent and one way of judging intelligence is by word usage, sentence construction and respect for language in messages.' I can not be any clearer than that and I am willing to rely on your integrity by now challenging you to show me how I can possibly be in your own words, 'ignorant of how words demonstrate a person's intelligence and ability to communicate effectively.'"
You missed the second half. Expounding with words demonstrates (to an extent) your intelligence. It's the matter of effective communication that you missed. I will grant that you are clearly intelligent, but that does not equate to social awareness and effective communication. Some of the most intelligent people I know in academia and pure research cannot effectively communicate with other people to save their lives. That is my challenge to you. Were you clear? Abundantly. Did it demonstrate good communication skills? Debatable. Is that my opinion? Of course. Is it backed by years of experience communicating effectively with other people? Yes. In fact, it's backed by an abundance of what you consider "research."
Look at it this way. You could say, "I want to penetrate your vagina with my penis and listen to you ask for repeated thrusts while calling yourself a host of derogatory names. You will place whatever I command in your hole, including furniture, power tools, and processed foods (really?). You will admit your depravity repeatedly, as I command you to shove whatever I desire into your wet hole." Or you could say, "I want to fuck your cunt with whatever I want while you scream that you're a whore." Without assuming your thoughts, I think many would consider the second more effective communication.
As for the error in your reversal discussing the term "pussy"... a more proper analogy would be "I want to fuck your cunt with my wee-wee." Perhaps that gets across your issue with the word a bit better.
And as for why I couldn't tear my eyes away from the absurdity...it was like watching a dog chase its tail. It was humourous to read, but after a bit I just couldn't believe that it kept going and going. It was fascinating.
My suggestion (and it is a sincere one) is to consider your audience, as any good writer should (and yes, I have plenty of experience to back that up). You aren't writing a paper to be published in a social science journal. You're writing an ad on a sexual social media site.
I admit, publicly, that I should have sent my reply via PM. I'm not one to confront people publicly. But I was insulted; my friends here on Lit were insulted. I do wish you the best of luck. But in my opinion, given all of my research, you would have more success with a more succinct post.
Bravo for the even longer post. Forgive me for not reading the whole thing, as you sent me the "director's cut" via PM.
As I said in my PM reply, I can't possibly address all of this. But you did issue a challenge:
"I will highlight the last sentence which hopefully does finally get through to you just how much I am aware of the importance of the usage of words as one indicator of general intelligence: 'I require women to be very intelligent and one way of judging intelligence is by word usage, sentence construction and respect for language in messages.' I can not be any clearer than that and I am willing to rely on your integrity by now challenging you to show me how I can possibly be in your own words, 'ignorant of how words demonstrate a person's intelligence and ability to communicate effectively.'"
You missed the second half. Expounding with words demonstrates (to an extent) your intelligence. It's the matter of effective communication that you missed. I will grant that you are clearly intelligent, but that does not equate to social awareness and effective communication. Some of the most intelligent people I know in academia and pure research cannot effectively communicate with other people to save their lives. That is my challenge to you. Were you clear? Abundantly. Did it demonstrate good communication skills? Debatable. Is that my opinion? Of course. Is it backed by years of experience communicating effectively with other people? Yes. In fact, it's backed by an abundance of what you consider "research."
Look at it this way. You could say, "I want to penetrate your vagina with my penis and listen to you ask for repeated thrusts while calling yourself a host of derogatory names. You will place whatever I command in your hole, including furniture, power tools, and processed foods (really?). You will admit your depravity repeatedly, as I command you to shove whatever I desire into your wet hole." Or you could say, "I want to fuck your cunt with whatever I want while you scream that you're a whore." Without assuming your thoughts, I think many would consider the second more effective communication.
As for the error in your reversal discussing the term "pussy"... a more proper analogy would be "I want to fuck your cunt with my wee-wee." Perhaps that gets across your issue with the word a bit better.
And as for why I couldn't tear my eyes away from the absurdity...it was like watching a dog chase its tail. It was humourous to read, but after a bit I just couldn't believe that it kept going and going. It was fascinating.
My suggestion (and it is a sincere one) is to consider your audience, as any good writer should (and yes, I have plenty of experience to back that up). You aren't writing a paper to be published in a social science journal. You're writing an ad on a sexual social media site.
I admit, publicly, that I should have sent my reply via PM. I'm not one to confront people publicly. But I was insulted; my friends here on Lit were insulted. I do wish you the best of luck. But in my opinion, given all of my research, you would have more success with a more succinct post.
Last edited:
U
unregistered
Guest
Similar threads
