Ominous Police State Ruling

Welcome to The New York Times on the Web!
For full access to our site, please complete this simple registration form.
As a member, you'll enjoy:

• In-depth coverage and analysis of news events from The New York Times FREE
• Up-to-the-minute breaking news and developing stories FREE
• Exclusive Web-only features, classifieds, tools, multimedia and much, much more FREE

Please enter your Member ID:

Please enter your password:

Remember my Member ID and password on this computer.
Forgot your password?


I can't believe that fucker Ashcroft is going to make everyone subscribe to the NY Times website.

That's just fucking evil!
 
FISA sucks

Secret courts, massive spying on citizens-- sounds like a police state to me.
 
Re: FISA sucks

REDWAVE said:
Secret courts, massive spying on citizens-- sounds like a police state to me.

Russia Nineteen Hundred Seventeen
 
Last edited:
Star Chamber

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review-- America's modern day Star Chamber.
 
You can trust Ashcroft not to violate anyone's constitutional rights. Why, he says so himself.

And he has such a sterling record so far.
:rolleyes:
 
That's why the founding father's gave us the right to bear arms, if the government becomes a police state, we are able to rise up in armed rebellion to overthrow it.

So why are the liberals so eager to disarm us?
 
The key to resisting a police state is not guns, necessarily, but being able to mobilize mass protests.
 
MNGuy said:
That's why the founding father's gave us the right to bear arms, if the government becomes a police state, we are able to rise up in armed rebellion to overthrow it.

Where did you get that crap?

Have you ever read the Bill of Rights? Wake the fuck up.
 
MNGuy said:
That's why the founding father's gave us the right to bear arms, if the government becomes a police state, we are able to rise up in armed rebellion to overthrow it.

So why are the liberals so eager to disarm us?

Yeah the Montana loonies with rifles against F-22 raptors.

Real useful amendment.
 
Weevil said:
Yeah the Montana loonies with rifles against F-22 raptors.



Little asian dudes in black pajamas with AK-47's vs. big Americans with B-52's.

Remember your history, man.
 
Problem Child said:
Little asian dudes in black pajamas with AK-47's vs. big Americans with B-52's.

Remember your history, man.

Sorry but for literotica purposes I've been banned from acknowledging the Vietnam War.

and they aren't comparable even a little bit.
 
Weevil said:
Sorry but for literotica purposes I've been banned from acknowledging the Vietnam War.

and they aren't comparable even a little bit.

Tell me why...chicken.
 
Problem Child said:
Tell me why...chicken.

Because it's the thick, hard to fight in jungles of Vietnam vs Montana

Because it's two groups of people on home turf as opposed to one team having a huge home team advantage.

Because, I believe, that the US Army learned their lessons from the Vietnam war.

On a side note did you see We were Soldiers

All I have to say is my wife gave up chicken wings.
 
Weevil said:
Because it's the thick, hard to fight in jungles of Vietnam vs Montana

Because it's two groups of people on home turf as opposed to one team having a huge home team advantage.

Because, I believe, that the US Army learned their lessons from the Vietnam war.

On a side note did you see We were Soldiers

All I have to say is my wife gave up chicken wings.


Have you ever seen the jungles of Tennessee?

Nevermind...we didn't lose in VN because of terrain.

I did see "Soldiers". They filmed it about twenty miles from my house in CA.

No, Dixon wasn't there.
 
Problem Child said:
Have you ever seen the jungles of Tennessee?

Nevermind...we didn't lose in VN because of terrain.

Didn't help though. And the terrain was useful to the Vietnamese(Could they have constructed their caverns out of rock?)
 
Weevil said:
Didn't help though. And the terrain was useful to the Vietnamese(Could they have constructed their caverns out of rock?)

The muhajideen won their Viet Nam against a similarly formidable opponent in a region completely devoid of jungle.

You can argue all you want for terrain. The Vietnamese beat us because as a nation they had will. We didn't.
 
REDWAVE said:
The key to resisting a police state is not guns, necessarily, but being able to mobilize mass protests.
Oh yeah, I'm sure Ashcroft is quaking in his boots at the thought that you may protest.

Wow, you're a cuntwaffle.

TB4p
 
REDWAVE said:
The key to resisting a police state is not guns, necessarily, but being able to mobilize mass protests.

I must say that it was a rousing success among Chinese students.

Four out of five Tiananmen Square survivors endors it completely!

Sorry. That was rude of me. I should go back to polishing my jackboots....
 
Back
Top