Oil Storm! Those Clever Liberals Strike Again!

amicus

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
14,812
Oil Storm! Those Clever Liberals Strike Again!

Using ‘worst case scenario’ events Co Writer Caroline Levy went beyond the bounds of belief, when she had a teen aged character say: “God doesn’t want us to use oil.”

This Michael Moore type ‘Mocumentary’, portrays greedy Americans finally get a ‘come-upance’ as oil supplies are interrupted, ships collide and oil refineries are sabotaged.

Gas lines are long, rioting breaks out and looters abound as the ‘ugly americans’ fall apart at the seams.

The tired old liberal mantra of conservation and limiting supplies and lifestyles dug an even deeper layer of disgrace by bringing in two families to ‘personalize’ the plight of middle class Americans.

In doing so, the film depicted Roosevelt, FDR, as the promised land, the family farmer at the mercy of government subsidies to agriculture and the ‘church’ solidly behind the eco-nuts as they pray for inclusion in the ecological litany.

This would be truly amusing if not for the obvious ploy that the Left Wing is courting the religious fundamental right in a way as obscene and obvious as an extended middle finger.

One should have expected it to be a British producer and co-writer; Europeans are so green with jealousy, they stoop to any level.

Well, to each his own…


OIL STORM!

“NEW YORK, June 3 (Reuters) - Think $55 a barrel oil is bad? Wait till a hurricane knocks out a U.S. pipeline and a port at the same time that militants are killing hostages in Saudi Arabia, sending oil prices over $150 a barrel.

That's the premise of "Oil Storm," a television docudrama set to premiere in the United States on Sunday. The movie uses exaggerated real life events and fictional characters to examine America's dependence on oil and the havoc a major disruption in supply could wreak on ordinary people.

The movie depicts -- albeit in the extreme -- what energy markets have spent much of the past year fretting about: hurricanes that can rip apart oil infrastructure and war and turbulence in the Middle East, which have driven crude prices to record highs.

And the writers aim to show why the intricacies of oil rigs and oil reserves should be as much a concern for average Americans, with their taste for gas guzzling SUVs and summer road trips, as they are for traders at the New York Mercantile Exchange.

"Everything is so interconnected that anything that happens in Saudi Arabia or China will have an impact on oil, and therefore an impact on you or I in terms of what happens at the pump," said Caroline Levy, its British producer and co-writer.
Levy is well aware that the movie could be criticized for fanning fears of a doomsday scenario, similar to last year's Hollywood blockbuster "The Day After Tomorrow", in which New York was flooded by a tidal wave before being frozen solid, in a series of events that defied the laws of physics.

Few specialists expect a chain of events to occur any time soon that would lead to oil at $150 a barrel, although investment bank Goldman Sachs did send shockwaves into the market in March when it warned oil prices could hit $105 a barrel under a "super-spike" scenario.

"None of what we're saying is so out of the realms of belief," said Levy, adding the movie is based on numerous interviews with energy experts and only a slight exaggeration of past events. "The purpose is to show how vulnerable the infrastructure of the oil industry in America is."

In the movie, which will be aired on Fox's FX network, a powerful hurricane reminiscent of last year's Ivan smashes into Port Fourchon, Louisiana, cutting off a majority of the nation's oil imports and crippling production in the Gulf of Mexico.

The U.S. administration turns to its ally and top world exporter Saudi Arabia, which boosts supplies but then is forced to deal with an unfolding crisis of its own, involving "Shoot first, ask questions later" security forces and hostages.

The movie depicts panic spreading across oil markets, sending oil prices above $150 a barrel, while cars across the United States line up outside gas stations, and everyone's lives are thrown into disarray.

"At the end of the movie, prices go back to pretty much what they were at the start of the year," said Levy. "But the film is basically saying 'What we can we learn from this?'"


the incomparable amicus...
 
It's a disaster move, for God's sake!

You're paranoid beyond belief.
 
Yes, we British are so jealous, especially when you refer to us as Europeans. Jealous of your wonderful knowledge of politics which enables you to group us with the completely different Continental Europe.

Once again, amicus gains the belly laugh. Thanks mate, I need to have something to laugh at on Monday morning.

Just out of interest, are you familiar with what happened in England when there were petrol station strikes a couple of years back?

The Earl
 
amicus said:
One should have expected it to be a British producer and co-writer; Europeans are so green with jealousy, they stoop to any level.
Please specify. Jealousy over what exactly? Your high dependancy on automobile transportation and a belevolus oil market?

The high taxing on gas and oil here in Sweden for instance is annoying, yes.

But it actually have one benifit. People are used to high gas prices, and there is a huge taxation buffer. When the cost of oil spikes, as it has done from time to time, the guvment lowers the tax temporarily, so that it doesn't hurt the consumer. Not because our guvment loves the consumers, but if they can't warm their homes, drive to work or to the mall, the guvment would lose more money. This is not usual, but during extreme conditions that raises the oil price, like the gulf war, or an especally cold winter, it has happened.

#L
 
Also, not long ago on television, these demonic Gay Jew liberals presented Anonymous Rex about a detective who is a disguised Veliciraptor.

Obviously a ploy by the evolutionists to undermine the very nature of humanity and its uniqueness by offering visions of another sentient species who was presented as more intelligent as ourselves.

On the movie screens, a British european writer's heinous work was presented. Stooping to any level, it presented the entire world being destroyed, humans being reduced to the third most intelligent species on the planet, cross-dressing by a woman in the guise of our hated enemy Charles Darwin, and a distinctly anti-progress, anti-capitalist message in its presentation of both the Constructor Fleet and the robots.

How long will we let this liberal fiction pollute the minds of us right thinking people?

Down with entertainment!!!
 
why, oh why, oh why?

if finite resources are not conserved they will eventually run out.

if we do not do something to control the amount of carbon emissions then our climate will continue to change at an ever-increasing rate.

if we do nothing to reduce pollution then the world environment will continue to be degraded.

why does "liberal" always = "bad"?

i was tempted to just say "away and fuck yourselves" but the probelm is that rampant consumption fucks us all.

our trans-atlantic cousins in the US are like kids in a sweet-shop - eat, eat, eat. but we all know that will make you sick. it's time to exert some self-control.
 
haldir said:
i was tempted to just say "away and fuck yourselves" but the probelm is that rampant consumption fucks us all.

I'd like to be able to say "Get tae fuck," but I'm lacking the Scottish accent to pull it off correctly. Amicus can't change his warped world-view, no matter how many times he contradicts himself or offers arguments more limp-wristed than a Ronan O'Gara tackle. The only recourse is to insult or ridicule, perhaps both.

The Earl
 
Earl - sounded Scottish tae me laddie. So we're back in the fundamentalist "I think therefore I'm right" mode again with this thread. Sigh - so be it.
 
TheEarl said:
I'd like to be able to say "Get tae fuck," but I'm lacking the Scottish accent to pull it off correctly. Amicus can't change his warped world-view, no matter how many times he contradicts himself or offers arguments more limp-wristed than a Ronan O'Gara tackle. The only recourse is to insult or ridicule, perhaps both.

The Earl

It sounds delicious, Earl. Turn the words slightly and say it to me. ;)

(and ignore ami - his threads are great fun without him)
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
It sounds delicious, Earl. Turn the words slightly and say it to me. ;)

(and ignore ami - his threads are great fun without him)

I'll bet you Haldir has the accent to make you melt in his mouth with that phrase. Never met a girl who doesn't react to Scotch swearing.

I can do "Bloody buggering hell!" in a fairly posh English accent if you like.

Haldir: I think amicus gets stuck on the thinking bit. He has the facts, he has theories, he has opinions and he somehow manages to extrapolate conclusions from them that bear no resemblence to normal logic. I flattened him in a debate about the merits of public health service and he accused me of lusting after empire. If you can spot the link, then you're a better man than I, gunga din.

The Earl
 
Here's a fine link to increase the general sense of doom.

http://www*****aftertheoilcrash.net/
 
Those sly, insinuating liberal hounds. How dare they suggest that moderating one's consumption, sharing scarce resources with others, and thinking of the future and welfare of the rest of mankind should be blended with Christian ideology?

Scandalous what some people will do in the name of politics.

Shanglan
 
Isn't that being played on the Fox network? I thought that was one of your networks Ami? If so, those sneaky liberals must be much more crafty than I gave them credit for.
 
Roscoe Rathburne...was it? Interesting link. Henny Penny, the sky is falling, the sky is falling!

That has been the constant refrain from the Liberal eco tribe for nearly a generation. Tree huggers, environmentalists, Elf's & Alfs, ACLU save the Whales! & Spotted owls and snail darters and the Amazon Rain forest; all running around screaming their silly heads off patting each other on the back and then buggering each other when the sun goes down to light generated by fossil fuels.

When I ran for public office way back in 1976, the same harbingers of doom predicted disaster in a decade. Guess what? It didn't happen.

Even though the Liberal 'anti'industrial left' has lobbied to prevent exploration and utilizing new sources of fossil fuels, the estimated reserve of petroleum (due to new discoveries) is somewhat larger now than at any time in history. Yes, I know I should have the source link available, but I just recalled that little tidbit, perhaps I will search later and add it to the post.

The 'anti industrial society' as coined by Ayn Rand, perhaps had its beginnings with the writings of David(SP) Malthus, more than a century ago.

He postulated that human growth was exponential and that the production of food was linear; thus he predicted starvation, before the turn of the century, the 20th century, 1900. Geez...

Howard Dean (democrat) made a rather telling statement, 'Republicans have never worked a day in their lives..."

Quite the opposite, the pointy headed intellectuals, who scratch their pancakes and pour syrup down their backs, who infest the education system as lice on the bodies of vital students, are 90 percent left wing, anti-industrial liberal democrats.

"Necessity is the mother of invention..." An old folk saying. When fossil fuels do begin to be depleted, and they eventually will, there will be new energy sources waiting in the wings.

It is not the nature of man to fix things before they are broken or to change habits before it becomes necessary.

Not just to pick on England, but I have seen the tiny little hovels you call 'housing' for the middle and lower class; I have seen the little toy cars the middle class drive around on still 16th century cobblestone streets.

When I visited Europe in 1970, I calculated that GB and the Continent were about 30 years, an entire generation, behind the United States, in terms of technology and creature comforts. From what I understand, that has not greatly changed.

It has been a marvelous 150 years since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Mankind has progressed in fantastic fashion throughout all his many and varied endeavors.

Yet there is still that fantasy, held by the Left, oh these many years, of returning to the pastoral garden of past history; to a slower paced, more thoughtful period of time.

So much human energy and resources are wasted by those who worship the past, attempt to preserve it and wallow in the miseries of unfullfilled longings, that if it were all applied to solving problems rather than fighting progress we would have a much more certain future.

Science and technology are the future. As with someone who lived in 1900 would not recognize the modern world of 2000; those of us now can not even imagine the wonders a century down the road, in 2100.

Have faith you wimpy Liberals, we will drag you along, kicking and screaming no doubt, into the future.

Lay down, I think I love you.

the amorous amicus...
 
amicus said:
Not just to pick on England, but I have seen the tiny little hovels you call 'housing' for the middle and lower class; I have seen the little toy cars the middle class drive around on still 16th century cobblestone streets.

When I visited Europe in 1970, I calculated that GB and the Continent were about 30 years, an entire generation, behind the United States, in terms of technology and creature comforts. From what I understand, that has not greatly changed.

BWAAAHAHAHAHA! Oh Jesus Christ amicus, that is so far off the map as to be falling into areas which are mark 'Here Be Monsters'.

Your sheer lack of understanding and knowledge all neatly framed in 2 paragraphs. <shakes head>

Oh deary deary me.

The Earl
 
Well, ya know, Earl...I speak with several people in several different countries on the continent...perhaps they all lie about gas prices, small cars and housing authorities and living with their parents for years because no apartments are available....

"amicus: Brits don't like to be considered Europeans? I caught some flack for that...
Jani: oh for sure.. yes!! Most do not like to be called European
amicus: hmmm...that never entered me feeble lil mind....
Jani: Scots, Welsh, Irish and English.. will always be known as first.. only after that British but never European.
amicus: ah, okay....remnants of the Roman Empire, I guess I can understand that...grins...
Jani: lol
amicus: chuckles...
Jani: LOl id the Scots hate the English what hope is there of the Brits being friendly with say, france?
Jani: France

So, I learned something from a lady in Scotland....

see, this ole dawg can learn....

amicus...
 
Agreed, Earl, the line on cobblestone streets was quite laughable. On the other hand, one of my SO's major reservations about returning to England (SO homeland) is the housing situation. It really is staggeringly expensive compared to our present home, and it really is quite small as well. There are some things I like about English houses - deep at heart I love those old Victorian and earlier homes - but it takes quite a lot of getting used to when one's living room isn't much bigger than our master bath, and for a steeper price as well. Mind you, I think that that has a great deal to do with population density and little or nothing to do with liberal policies.

Shanglan
 
Sighs...the cobblestone streets, (when I was there) in Piccadilly & Montemart and places in Brussels and in Heidleburg and Amsterdam, I thought were quaint and charming, perhaps they are all gone now...

amicus...
 
amicus said:
Sighs...the cobblestone streets, (when I was there) in Piccadilly & Montemart and places in Brussels and in Heidleburg and Amsterdam, I thought were quaint and charming, perhaps they are all gone now...

amicus...

They are there and they are quaint, as they are in, for example, Philadelphia. But your comment appeared to suggest that that was what everyday people drove on. They're not.
 
amicus said:
It is not the nature of man to fix things before they are broken or to change habits before it becomes necessary.
It is not the nature of man to live in peace with his neighbors either. But I'd like to think that mankind can and should improve itself. You think otherwise?
 
BlackShanglan said:
Agreed, Earl, the line on cobblestone streets was quite laughable. On the other hand, one of my SO's major reservations about returning to England (SO homeland) is the housing situation. It really is staggeringly expensive compared to our present home, and it really is quite small as well. There are some things I like about English houses - deep at heart I love those old Victorian and earlier homes - but it takes quite a lot of getting used to when one's living room isn't much bigger than our master bath, and for a steeper price as well. Mind you, I think that that has a great deal to do with population density and little or nothing to do with liberal policies.

Shanglan


Yeah. I remember my last discussion with him whereby he un equivocably proved the USA's superiority over England by dint of the housing market. It had obviously never occurred to him that the UK has a population of 56million in a geographically small area. Simple economics and scarcity of land drive house prices up, rather than anything wonderful about the US system compared to the UK one. <shakes head> If something that simple passes him by, you really have to wonder about the veracity of his other points.

The Earl
 
Last edited:
I also remember tons of bicycles in Brussels and Amsterdam and a paucity of automobiles and neither place has the climate of Miami.

30 million people live in Mexico City and the environs, Tokyo has about 10 million, if I recall and New York City and Los Angeles proper also have nearly 10 million population...if memory serves...

I think I visited only London, Manchester and Liverpool, thus my sampling was small, but even back then, I noticed the absence of 'high rise' buildings, even for commerce, let alone apartment or condominium complexes.

Vertical expansion has long been a part of population growth in most cities and countries.

I think it is not a function of limited landspace and a high density population that has stifled British development, rather I think it is the 'land use policies' put in place by the government as the agenda for 'parks and greenspace' has taken hold more firmly than in American cities. If you don't have the moxie to admit this, then perhaps I will do a search and back up my contention.


~~~~~~~~~~

Disaster Movies! Oh, duh. No shit dick tracy?

Advocates of the liberal left do not want to admit that film makers are for the most part guided by left wing ideology and have been for half a century.

As far back a Jules Vernes and Orson Welles, it is the terrible 'industrial society' that has destroyed humanity. All the modern technology could not defeat the Martians, but a cold virus, a human virus could. Even before, A Tale of Two Cities and a whole plethora of fiction writers decried the downfall of humanity because of the 'cruel machines' that destroy lives and the environment.

It has not stopped. "The Day the Earth Stood Still' that man dared experiment with atomic energy. Doomday films about the Rain forest being destroyed and changing earth;s climate, about oil drilling that ended up sinking California, mining that caused earthquakes.

Most recently, The Day After Tomorrow, global warming farce, The Abyss, nuclear weapons; even the Terminator series, based on the evil of the machines and the ultimate destruction of mankind.

I have 600 cable channels and I browse the titles almost daily. Who can deny the political agenda of Gay Rights movies, homosexual couples movies, pro single family, pro abortion themes, anti business, anti industry, oil at the root and base of all evil, environmental disaster at every turn, plights about the lack of universal health care, poor education facilities in inner city areas and on and on and on....gag a maggot.

And you really have the nerve to say there is no 'liberal agenda' in entertainment films, aids concerts, farm aid, african relief.

There are dozens more feature films, television sit coms and drama series that all reflect and portray a commonly perceived left wing agenda, only the blind would not see, or those wearing blinders.

And you wonder why the religious right is in rebellion against the permissive left?

And, I can happily say, it is just beginning. A full half century of liberal media bias is coming to an end and I think perhaps Michael Moore and Dan Rather can be seen as the catalysts that finally made it clear to all, along with that Colorado professor who has been in the news lately.

The sky is NOT falling, Henny Penny. Take your head out of (comment censored) the sand.

amicus...
 
Liar: "...It is not the nature of man to live in peace with his neighbors either. But I'd like to think that mankind can and should improve itself. You think otherwise?..."
__________________

I've got my eye on the neighbors wife, she's choice and ready and willing. Do I think mankind will improve itself?

No, I do not.

I think we will be as we have always been. Possessive, territorial, agressive, acquisitive and above all, competitive to the nth degree.

It seems to be difficult to convery the concept that through competition, the best wins out on a playing field with enforced individual rights and an open market place.

Cooperation compromise and sacrifice works fine in a factory situation wherein individuals perform a simple task over and over again under a guiding force of management.

A factory is a small reflection of an overall society. If individuals cooperate, compromise and sacrifice individual desires for a paycheck or a health plan, they become as Orwellian robots are portrayed.

The great literature of the world, the great advances in science and medicine, all come about as the result of one individual, in head on competition with another.

It is the nature of man and the nature of reality that it should be so. It is how we evolved and survived against tooth and claw and the elements with only our surperiour brain to lead us.

I find that much more attractive than I do a society of mutually cooperating drones living a regulated but secure life in a controlled society.

But then, perhaps that is only moi.

amicuserroonie....
 
Amicus - what century did you visit? cobbles in Piccadily?

and you visited London, Manchester and Liverpool and saw no high-rises? shit i want some of what you were on!

human progress is not measured on the baubles that you treasure soooo much like fuck-off cars and houses the size of brussels but rather on how we treat each other and the wordl in which we live. Endless exploitation, relying on our ingenuity to provide a further source to exploit is the road to extinction for humanity you dick. how much better to use that ingenuity to create a sustainable system.
 
actually - i'm now really pissed off and i'm sure that you'll just tag this as another lefty, liberal actually give a shit about the world outburst amicus but here it goes anyway.

why don't you guys just carry on doin what your doin and when your country is a polluted, desolate, uninhabitable shit-hole you can use your military muscle to take over the rest of the world and do the same there. eventually there'll only be you guys left and then maybe you'll be happy, stickin your heads up yer own arses.

i'm outa here - goin back to ma cobble streets, ma wee hoose and no car.

sorry if i offended anyone.

och aye the nooooooooo
 
Back
Top