irksomesauce
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2016
- Posts
- 932
So, after reading a handful of The Washington fake news Post offerings covering how they subjectively viewed much of what the Tool uttered and did today, I chose to head on over to cbsnews.com to read their interpretation of Vice Admiral Robert Harward turning down being the new National Security Advisor...
No problem: plenty of good reporting, with just a tad of defensive, subjective "attacking" insertion as it applies to them, the press, but not nearly as ridiculously, partisanly opinionated as The fake news Post's crap I'd just finished reading.
So, I look at the 2nd of their 3 main offerings on the same page: Key Trump surrogates once led fight vs. WikiLeaks and Assange...
...right: like I need to read them construe their own story to justify their own headline. No thanks.
And then I look at the 3rd main offering:
25 things you still don't know about Barack Obama
Just how many almonds does he really eat, anyway?
http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/robert-harward-turns-down-national-security-adviser-job/
No problem: plenty of good reporting, with just a tad of defensive, subjective "attacking" insertion as it applies to them, the press, but not nearly as ridiculously, partisanly opinionated as The fake news Post's crap I'd just finished reading.
So, I look at the 2nd of their 3 main offerings on the same page: Key Trump surrogates once led fight vs. WikiLeaks and Assange...
...right: like I need to read them construe their own story to justify their own headline. No thanks.
And then I look at the 3rd main offering:
25 things you still don't know about Barack Obama
Just how many almonds does he really eat, anyway?
http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/robert-harward-turns-down-national-security-adviser-job/
