Obama's $400,000 speech could prompt Congress to go after his pension

james_1957

Literotica Guru
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Posts
778
WASHINGTON — Last year, then-president Barack Obama vetoed a bill that would have curbed the pensions of former presidents if they took outside income of $400,000 or more.

So now that former president Barack Obama has decided to accept $400,000 for an upcoming Wall Street speech, the sponsors of that bill say they'll reintroduce that bill in hopes that President Trump will sign it.

The Obama hypocrisy on this issue is revealing," said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and sponsor of the 2016 bill. "His veto was very self-serving."

Chaffetz and Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, the sponsor of the companion Senate bill, say they will re-introduce the Presidential Allowance Modernization Act this month. The bill would cap presidential pensions at $200,000, with another $200,000 for expenses. But those payments would be reduced dollar-for-dollar once their outside income exceeds $400,000.

The issue isn't a partisan one — or at least, it wasn't last year. The bill passed both the House and Senate with no opposition, and no veto threat had come from the White House.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ss-go-after-his-pension-trump-bush/101242772/
 
On the face of it the law sounds downright unconstitutional. As big a turd as Obama is, you can't have a law preventing someone from earning a living.
 
I don't think they should get pensions at all. Definitely not longer than they served.

How long has Mr. Peanut been drawing a pension?

Daddy Bush?

How long did Stumble BumFord?
 
So 3 or 4 guys at a time get a few hundred thousand a year. Seems fair and it's too small to matter to our budget.
Don't care how much money they make either. That shouldn't matter.
 
Back
Top