Obamacare ‘navigator’ in Kansas has outstanding arrest warrant

M

miles

Guest
Anyone who still thinks this train wreck is a good idea needs to have their head examined.
------------------------------------------------

A woman with an outstanding warrant for her arrest is currently serving as an Obamacare “navigator” in Lawrence, Kansas.

Rosilyn Wells — the Director of Outreach and Enrollment for the Heartland Community Health-care Center (HCHC) – is “the only full-time Affordable Care Act navigator in Lawrence,” according to the Lawrence Journal-World.

Wells was certified as an Obamacare navigator despite her financial history, which includes a bankruptcy in 2003, a 2007 civil charge from a local check cashing business called Midwest Checkrite for writing a bad check, being more than $1700 behind on her state tax bill, and having an outstanding arrest warrant in nearby Shawnee County. Wells lives and works in Douglass County.


Reached by phone, The Shawnee County Sheriff’s Office would not elaborate on the specific charges related to Wells’ arrest warrant.

Navigators are creations of the federal government and they are paid to work closely with consumers — and their personal information — to help them navigate the newly-created Obamacare exchanges.

The Obamacare navigator program has fallen under heavy criticism for its privacy pitfalls, with the House Oversight Committee issuing a report only two weeks ago which warned that navigators would not be properly vetted to protect consumers.

The report pointed out navigators would have access to all sorts of personal data.

“[T]he main concern for consumers is the heightened risk of identity theft and financial loss from a poorly managed outreach campaign,” the Oversight Committee report said. “Navigators and Assisters will come into contact with a plethora of personally identifiable information (PII), including an applicant’s Social Security number, date of birth and income, as well as the PII of everyone in an applicant’s household.”

The Obama administration’s decision not to require background checks for navigators compounds the privacy risks, the Oversight Committee wrote.

“In part, substantial risks remain because the Administration decided not to require background checks and fingerprinting of individuals hired by Navigator and Assister organizations,” the committee wrote. “Under the Administration’s plan, unless states have already taken actions to protect their citizens, Navigators and Assisters are not prohibited from hiring convicted felons, including individuals convicted of identity theft or fraud.”
 
Criminals hang out with criminals


Obama has made government into the new Enron
 
Why the fuck would you bother doing a background check on a navigator?!
 
Hey with no background checks we could end up with Al-Qaeda running it. I will admit the Obama administration motive in no demanding no background checks was to make it easy for American felons to find a job.

Just another fuck up. This is going to be a mess of disastrous proportions. It's total insanity.
 
Don't you remember in an effort to destroy healthcare for poor the repbulitards (not only are costing us $300 million a day) but tried to destroy the navigators as well?

Obamacare navigators are necessary



114

Share to Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Add to PersonalPost

Share via Email

Print Article
More




















By Editorial Board, Published: September 6




IN THE FIERCE debate over what would become the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the signature policy achievement of President Obama’s first term, there was relatively little to-do over the question of the bill’s so-called navigators.

These are members of advocacy groups and social service organizations charged with helping people decipher — or navigate — the ACA’s online health-insurance marketplace and then choose the best plan. This was among the most reasonable components of the act: Health care in this country is complicated, and having people help others work through the rules and regulations will allow many Americans — especially lower-income Americans — get the coverage they need.




Washington Post Editorials






Editorials represent the views of The Washington Post as an institution, as determined through debate among members of the editorial board. News reporters and editors never contribute to editorial board discussions, and editorial board members don’t have any role in news coverage.



Read more



Latest Editorials

License to drive
License to drive

Editorial Board OCT 13

The right way to help illegal immigrants.




Risky business
Risky business

Editorial Board OCT 13

Companies must arm themselves against cyber threats.




No disarming delay
No disarming delay

Editorial Board OCT 13

Iran’s seriousness must be tested.





.

But in the years since the ACA became law, navigators have become a major friction point in the push to unravel Obamacare in state legislatures across the country.

Insurance brokers and agents have led the charge, insisting that navigators will impede their ability to do business. For decades, agents argue, they have been the ones to sell insurance to individuals and small businesses and help them weigh their options (albeit for a fee).

Obamacare ultimately left control over navigator programs to the states, so insurance agencies and brokers have lobbied lawmakers to regulate the navigators and ensure that they cannot assume any of the roles traditionally filled by agents and brokers. According to a report by the Commonwealth Fund, these efforts have been remarkably successful: In the past 1½ years, more than 15 states, including Ohio, Texas, Florida and Virginia, have passed laws regulating navigators. In five others, legislation has been proposed but not yet been passed or has been passed but not yet signed by the governor.

These states make a credible argument that navigators — like doctors, lawyers and, yes, insurance brokers — should be subject to some oversight. But too many states have allowed insurance agencies to dictate the laws, inhibiting navigators from doing their jobs. Most of the states with these regulations on the books require navigators to undergo training in addition to the federal training they already must complete, often at their own expense. Many of the laws also prohibit navigators from advising people about the coverage details of certain plans, ostensibly in the name of preserving fair competition. It’s fair enough to prohibit navigators from endorsing one plan over another, but should they really not be allowed to advise consumers to consider all the variables?

The sad reality is that these regulations will make it harder for people to get the help they need. Millions of Americans already are at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing the health-care marketplace, and the Obama administration was right to include a provision in the ACA to assist them.
 
Americans will be turning over your personal health, tax, and finance, information to the criminal element which will be salted throughout the ranks of those navigators? The national Scamdar is already lit up across the country.

..and the Lit libs don't have a fucking clue.
 
Yikes – Guy Charged $95 After Using HHS Obamacare Website…. Perhaps The First Person Penalized Under New HHS Mandate




Ouch. Just another of those unintended consequences from passing a bill before reading, and enacting before it’s ready.

Doctor ObamaHatTip dmoseylou - Here’s the summary: A guy is actually able to navigate the HHS Obamacare website. He completes his registration, enters in all the information, reviews his options to select coverage, sees the price and then declines to accept.

Essentially he almost enrolls but then chooses to do further research and find if additional private coverage not on the exchange might be available for him.

Should be no big deal right?

WRONG.

A few days pass and what does he get in the mail? A bill from the IRS for $95 for not selecting a coverage plan. Yes, that’s right – he got the first year penalty immediately assessed just for NOT enrolling.

D’oh,….. Apparently the system is set up to recognize such consumers as “uninsured” and assumes you will not get alternate coverage. Ergo you are uninsured and now subject to the penalty…. so, pay you must !
 
sheet.jpg
 
According to SCOTUS there is no IRS enforcement mechanism in the act. Lawyers are saying the only IRS alternative is deduct the fine from your tax refund, if any.

Lawyers and politicians: two of the biggest groups of liars in the world. Just imagine the people who are both! :eek:
 
There's close to 20,000 Obamacare navigators nationwide.

One bad apple so far in the bunch.

This, of course, means Mitt Romney is president and Obamacare is null and void.

:nods:
 
Obamacare Exchange Warns People Enrolling: “We May Share Information You Provided For Law Enforcement And Audit Activities”…




As if people needed another reason not to sign up.

Via Weekly Standard:


On October 8, THE WEEKLY STANDARD reported that the privacy policy of the Maryland Health Connection (MHC), the state’s Obamacare insurance marketplace, included a statement that the marketplace “may share information provided in your application with the appropriate authorities for law enforcement and audit activities.”

An email had been sent to the MHC on October 3 requesting clarification of the policy, and included these inquires: Does that include both federal and state authorities? What type of information from the application might be of interest to law enforcement and/or state/federal auditors? However, no response was received before the story was published.

A follow up email sent to the MHC a day after the story ran was answered by the MHC with the promise of a response the following day, but none was forthcoming. A third email sent on Friday, October 11, was finally answered late that evening by communications manager Betsy Charlow.
 
How Obamacare Will Shrink the Labor Supply




Under the Affordable Care Act, someone making less than 138 percent of the poverty line qualifies for Medicaid, and someone between 138 and 400 percent of the poverty line is qualified to receive a federal tax subsidy for health insurance bought on a government exchange. But here is the problem: premiums will rise for millions of Americans because of requirements that policies provide certain benefits that they didn’t offer before. This means plenty of people will now have a pricier plan, and no way to defray the cost. My colleague Chuck Blahous sends me this piece from SFGate that gives an example of what that could look like for many families:


Take, for example, Jacqueline Proctor of San Francisco. She and her husband are in their early 60s. They have been paying $7,200 a year for a bare-bones Kaiser Permanente health plan with a $5,000 per person annual deductible. “Kaiser told us the plan does not comply with Obamacare and the substitute will cost more than twice as much,” about $15,000 per year, she says.

This new plan, Kaiser’s cheapest offering for 2014, would consume about 25 percent of their after-tax income. The new plan still has a $5,000 deductible but provides coverage for things her current policy does not, such as maternity care, healthy child visits and coverage for dependents up to age 26. Proctor has no use for such coverage, since her son is 30.

In other words, this couple makes too much money to qualify for the subsidy, but they will see their premium increase significantly, consuming a larger share of their income without clear added benefits to them. The author of the piece goes on to provide a series of suggestions about how to get the subsidy nonetheless. The easiest way: Lower your income level. Here is a sample of what people can do:


There are several ways to reduce MAGI [Modified Adusted Gross Income]. If you are working, you can make a tax-deductible contribution to an individual retirement account, 401(k) or other workplace plan for 2014. (IRA contributions for 2014 can be made until April 15, 2015.)

You might be able to take advantage of other deductions that appear above the AGI line on your tax return, such as student loan interest and tuition and fees.

Don’t worry about itemized deductions (for charitable contributions, mortgage interest, state income taxes and such). They won’t impact your MAGI because they come below AGI on your tax return.

Here is another one, which seems like a problem:


You can also consider reducing your 2014 income by working just a bit less.

We don’t know how many Americans will decide to work less to benefit from the subsidy, but it won’t be zero. As I have mentioned before, over time, welfare payments definitely do have an impact on people’s labor supply and the overall health of an economy.
 
Obamacare Exchange Warns People Enrolling: “We May Share Information You Provided For Law Enforcement And Audit Activities”…As if people needed another reason not to sign up.Via Weekly Standard:On October 8, THE WEEKLY STANDARD reported that the privacy policy of the Maryland Health Connection (MHC), the state’s Obamacare insurance marketplace, included a statement that the marketplace “may share information provided in your application with the appropriate authorities for law enforcement and audit activities.”
An email had been sent to the MHC on October 3 requesting clarification of the policy, and included these inquires: Does that include both federal and state authorities? What type of information from the application might be of interest to law enforcement and/or state/federal auditors? However, no response was received before the story was published.A follow up email sent to the MHC a day after the story ran was answered by the MHC with the promise of a response the following day, but none was forthcoming. A third email sent on Friday, October 11, was finally answered late that evening by communications manager Betsy Charlow.

Previously refudiated by the federal government back on October 9th.
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=49766949#post49766949
 
Robert Gibbs is embarrassed by Obamacare and wants to fire folks, but not it's author:

GIBBS CALLS FOR FIRINGS OVER 'EXCRUCIATINGLY EMBARRASSING' OBAMACARE ROLLOUT

Video here:

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-...out?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Major project rollouts always have glitches.

I realize you spent the majority of your working days in a job with your name embroidered over your pocket so you know nothing of complex projects.

When there is a new Apple iPhone and people have to wait to buy one due to unexpected demand, it's called a runaway hit.

When there is a new government program and people have to wait to enroll due to unexpected demand, people like you immediately call it a failure.

:rolleyes:
 
Times are hard when the former mouthpiece for the administration wants to fire the people responsible for mismanaging of the Obamacare program when the rest of the administration spends it's time lying about how all is really well with it.

Great run-on sentence there, spanky. :rolleyes:

I would point out that there is a precedent for Democratic spokesmen stabbing their former employer in the back for an opportunity to gorge on Koch money: Does the name Dick Morris ring any bells?
 
Well, Vetty, you're chronically unemployed, why not download and read 'em since you've got a lot of time on your hands.
 
Back
Top