Obama Was Such a Serial Liar...

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,093
[Please do not post copyright material without citation, and then limit your excerpts to less than 5 paragraphs, per our forum guidelines.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At least they're saying it was the real Osama bin Laden now.
 
Vettebitch is pretty bent out of shape over the failure of his president Trump that he has to attack a superior man and president.lol
 
we might have known he'd pull something like this:


SHOCK REPORT: Obama Hid 470,000 Documents From Bin Laden Raid To Ensure His Reelection
ByHANK BERRIEN November 3, 2017

In a powerful and comprehensive piece in The Weekly Standard, editor Stephen Hayes delineates in detail how the Obama Administration hid almost half a million documents seized from the raid on Osama bin Laden's compound in order to perpetuate the lie that Al Qaeda was defeated after bin Laden’s death, thus paving the way for Obama’s 2012 victory.

Hayes begins his odyssey into the Obama Administration’s duplicity by noting that the day before Obama left the White House, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper had the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) issue a press release claiming the administration had declassified enough documents seized in the raid to “close the book” on bin Laden. The release was even titled, “Closing the Book on Bin Laden: Intelligence Community Releases Final Abbottabad Documents.”

Yet after the May 2, 2011 raid, Obama’s national security advisor, Tom Donilon, said the documents seized were extensive enough to fill a “small college library.” As Hayes points out, “A senior military intelligence official who briefed reporters at the Pentagon on May 7, 2011, said: ‘As a result of the raid, we’ve acquired the single largest collection of senior terrorist materials ever.’”

Hayes writes, “Why would ODNI think it could get away with such an aggressive lie? … In this context, ODNI’s bet wasn’t a crazy one. No one outside of a small group of terrorism researchers and intelligence professionals had paid much attention to the fate of the bin Laden documents. The likelihood that these ODNI claims would get much scrutiny in the middle of the frenzy that accompanies a presidential transition was low.”

He continues:

"In the spring of 2012, with the Republican presidential primaries nearing an end and shortly before the first anniversary of the successful raid on bin Laden’s compound, Obama’s National Security Council hand-picked 17 documents to be provided to the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point for analysis. … The West Point documents were shared with Obama-friendly journalists. Their conclusion was the only one possible, given the documents they were provided: At the time of his death, Osama bin Laden was frustrated and isolated, a relatively powerless leader of a dying organization. In the summer and fall of 2012, Obama would use this theme as the main national security rationale for his reelection: Al Qaeda was alternately “on the run” or “decimated” or “on the path to defeat.”

The rest here:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23145...m_content=110417-news&utm_campaign=position2#

Look, the author is certainly entitled to his opinion but the fact remains that 95% of the population would never read those documents, the MSM would never print them, and in the minds of far too many Obama was the guy who 'killed' bin Laden.

Tracking bin Laden down was a multi-year effort. Obama just happened to be president when bin Laden was run to ground. He did sign the 'go ahead' for the operation but in that respect he had no choice. Had word gotten out, and it would, that he had taken a pass on the operation it's likely he wouldn't have been re-elected.

WRT Obama declaring al Queda dead and gone, well, the argument can be made that it was decapitated. On the other hand we have witnessed many al Queda 'decapitations' and like the Hydra, it merely grows a new head and reappears somewhere else.

In one respect al Queda is like a religion. A religion based on a religion. It's not a person, it's a philosophy and as long as the philosophy persists, so will al Queda.

Obama's fault was in his persistence in refusing to acknowledge that al Queda, and other such entities, ARE based in the core tenants of Islam. And continually stating that, "they aren't Muslim's.' Well, yes they are. Their beliefs, and actions. are based on many of the core tenants of the Qu'ran and damn near half of the Muslim world, 1.6 billion strong, sympathize with those actions and beliefs.
 
Look, the author is certainly entitled to his opinion but the fact remains that 95% of the population would never read those documents, the MSM would never print them, and in the minds of far too many Obama was the guy who 'killed' bin Laden.

Tracking bin Laden down was a multi-year effort. Obama just happened to be president when bin Laden was run to ground. He did sign the 'go ahead' for the operation but in that respect he had no choice. Had word gotten out, and it would, that he had taken a pass on the operation it's likely he wouldn't have been re-elected.

WRT Obama declaring al Queda dead and gone, well, the argument can be made that it was decapitated. On the other hand we have witnessed many al Queda 'decapitations' and like the Hydra, it merely grows a new head and reappears somewhere else.

In one respect al Queda is like a religion. A religion based on a religion. It's not a person, it's a philosophy and as long as the philosophy persists, so will al Queda.

Obama's fault was in his persistence in refusing to acknowledge that al Queda, and other such entities, ARE based in the core tenants of Islam. And continually stating that, "they aren't Muslim's.' Well, yes they are. Their beliefs, and actions. are based on many of the core tenants of the Qu'ran and damn near half of the Muslim world, 1.6 billion strong, sympathize with those actions and beliefs.

Yeah, and they're all coming to get you! Be scared old man!
 
That isn't going to happen and you know it.

Attack the publisher, attack the author, but NEVER, EVER, address any underlying facts.

This has been a bad week for the Looneyville on the left. Donna Brazile let us know how Hillary subverted her party, cheated Bernie out of the nomination, how she and Obama stole its money and left the DNC destitute. The JFK release spelled out the hypocrisy of MLK, his orgies, his drinking, his wanton general debauchery, his adultery with Joan Baez and white prostitutes, his communist connections. All of that and the moral collapse of the Hollywood and MSM elite. The Lit elite have gone from being cock drunk to punch drunk. It's safe space time for them, DBD.:D;)
 
This has been a bad week for the Looneyville on the left. Donna Brazile let us know how Hillary subverted her party, cheated Bernie out of the nomination, how she and Obama stole its money and left the DNC destitute. The JFK release spelled out the hypocrisy of MLK, his orgies, his drinking, his wanton general debauchery, his adultery with Joan Baez and white prostitutes, his communist connections. All of that and the moral collapse of the Hollywood and MSM elite. The Lit elite have gone from being cock drunk to punch drunk. It's safe space time for them, DBD.:D;)

Can't be proven. Best you can say is that she made damn sure the deck was stacked.

In the case of the monies I don't blame the Clinton's. You can lay that trip at Debbie the Douchbag's doorstep. Caveat Emptor dude. Now, if Debbie the Douche was 'colluding' with the Clinton's, well, that's the democrats look out.

As an aside, you want them running the economy?
 
Back
Top