Obama Reveals He May Be One-Term President

Obama_Sucks

Educating The Uneducated
Joined
Jul 9, 2008
Posts
1,496
President Obama has failed in one of the most important jobs a president faces: persuading the country to follow him, says Newsweek Senior Editor Jonathan Alter, author of a new book about Obama’s first year in office.

In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV, Alter also says Obama will move to the right if Democrats lose big in the midterm elections. Alter predicts he could face a primary challenge from both the left and the right in 2012, and suggests the possibility that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vice President Biden could switch places in a second term – although Alter reveals that Obama feels he could be a one-term president.

Alter’s newly released book, “The Promise: President Obama, Year One,” has garnered major media attention for its riveting insider’s perspective on what happened during Obama’s first year.




Asked whether Obama has followed his campaign promise to govern in a bipartisan manner, Alter responds: “No, he hasn’t. That was something he just could not make good on in the presidency, that idea of being more bipartisan.

“He tried to put some Republicans in the Cabinet. He does have Bob Gates, who is a Republican and has been in Republican administrations, as his most influential member of the Cabinet, Secretary of Defense.

“But it is quite true that he has not governed in a bipartisan way, and I think there’s enough blame for this to go around.”

Alter discloses in his book that, “in the first week of his presidency, Obama went up to Capitol Hill and met with the Republican caucus on the House side — no Democrats — and he wanted their input on the stimulus.

“He had already agreed to more than $300 billion in tax cuts, but he wanted to see if he could get some agreement from the Republicans on spending increases. [House Minority Leader] John Boehner told all the Republicans before the meeting, none of us are voting for Obama’s stimulus plan,” Alter tells Newsmax.TV.

“So in a sense, Obama was extending his hand to at least try to be bipartisan, and it was just brushed away by the Republicans. It was in their political interest, as we are now finding out, not to cooperate.

“After that, I think a lot of Obama’s efforts at bipartisanship were kind of phony. He just wanted credit for looking bipartisan, and at that point pretty early in his presidency had given up on real bipartisanship.”

No president’s approval ratings have ever tumbled as quickly as Obama’s in such a short period of time, Alter acknowledges, but he refers to a new NBC News poll showing “that Obama’s personal favorable ratings are higher at this point in his term than either Reagan or Clinton.

“One thing that is clear, though, is that the public doesn’t really approve of his program. They kind of like him personally. They don’t like the direction right now that he’s taking the country.

“He has failed in his first year in one of the most important jobs that any president has, which is to persuade the country to follow him.”

Alter’s book, released this week, makes reference to Obama’s temper. He was asked whether the president has a short fuse.

“He does not lose his cool, but in some ways it’s scarier — kind of this icy stare,” Alter says.

“He gets very upset about leaks. Instead of talking about what he should be talking about that day, he’s obsessing on these leaks.”

Comparing Bill Clinton and Obama on their handling of the presidency, Alter notes that, on healthcare, Clinton failed to pass reform legislation while Obama succeeded, “immaterial of whether one feels it’s a stinking bill or something that’s good for the country.

“Just on the success or failure level, he’s achieved more than Clinton at this point. But it’s early yet. He has a hundred ways to fail. And Clinton had some real successes later on in his term.

“We’ll see what happens to Obama. He told me he could be a one-term president.”

After losing Congress in 1994, Clinton moved to the right and center and signed such legislation as welfare reform. Asked whether Obama might do the same if Democrats take a big hit in November, Alter responds: “I think he will. He’s a pragmatist. I don’t see him as a real ideologue. He’s an idealist in some ways, but he wants to do what works. He’s not really into tilting at windmills.”

Alter was also asked, if Obama’s approval numbers continue to erode, could he face a primary challenge from someone like Hillary Clinton or Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh, who has said he is not seeking re-election this year.

“Hillary Clinton, I would say absolutely not,” Alter declares.

“There would have to be something that they were divided on that was much more profound on issue grounds.

“I think it would be more likely that she and [Joe] Biden would trade places — maybe she becomes vice president if Obama is re-elected, to tee her up for 2016.

“Could Evan Bayh or someone else decide to challenge Obama from the right? Absolutely. I don’t think it’s likely, but it’s actually possible. There’s a lot of history of that in American politics.

“And it’s even possible, if he moves right after the midterms, you could see a very liberal challenge to him from the left that would complicate his political existence.”

Could that challenge come from Howard Dean? Alter said: “I would not rule that out.”
 
Even Clinton says he's likeable enough. He will win again in 2012.
 
When thug politicians can't get popular support, they turn to the use of force.
 
Clinton ejaculated on a nice blue dress. Obama has been jacking off since day one, and while the nation withers and slips into ruin, no solution springs forth from his loins, nothing viable enough to spur growth.:D;)
There is an easily accessible solution, but the Republicans refuse to cooperate. They are dragging our nation needlessly through a gutter just because they want to save face.
 
Clinton ejaculated on a nice blue dress. Obama has been jacking off since day one, and while the nation withers and slips into ruin, no solution springs forth from his loins, nothing viable enough to spur growth.:D;)

Here I go getting ready to talk about stuff I don't know enough about to really get into a debate, but i'll give it a go anyway.
Maybe you're not serious or it's a joke I'm not getting, or maybe it's just trolling. But the more I hear it the more I think you people are full of shit. Maybe I need to know where you guys are coming from to understand your point of views better. But you don't provide any backgrounds to your opinions and accusations. And the reasonings I read aren't convincing at all. It all sounds very unreasonable.

I hear a lot of stuff towards Obama but I never hear any reasons of substance backing it
"he's not handling the oil spill crisis well" What does that mean? Give some specifics or an example. Is there even such a thing as a well handled crisis?
"he's not doing anything about the economy"
"he's a ignorant, arrogant power hungry guy" That's redicilous. It's one thing saying he's incompetant. Maybe he is, but attacking his character like that.. Come on. Lots of people in power are ignorant and power hungry. You probably have to be like that in order to get in a position of power. You don't become the president by being nice. That doesn't mean you lose your moral and common sense. People voted for him mainly because they liked his character and stance on things. Was it some kind of masquarade?
 
Did you understand all the criticism of Bush for eight years? Think of it as what goes around comes around.
Bush's decisions were made by God and gut. Obama's are being made by reasoned examination of facts and consensus of opinion.

Your criticism doesn't come from intellect.
 
What's wrong with decisions being made by God? When radical Islamics do it, you lefties seem to think it's cool because the USA deserves it. :rolleyes:
 
What's wrong with decisions being made by God? When radical Islamics do it, you lefties seem to think it's cool because the USA deserves it. :rolleyes:
The US is a constitutional republic. When it gets declared a theocracy, then the President can make decisions with his magic cups.
 
The US is a constitutional republic. When it gets declared a theocracy, then the President can make decisions with his magic cups.
What does that have to do with the president claiming to do what God told him?
 
The US is a constitutional republic. When it gets declared a theocracy, then the President can make decisions with his magic cups.

you would've bashed George Washington had you been around back then
 
you would've bashed George Washington had you been around back then
You know, George Washington did make one decision on the basis of what the minister of his church said. He stopped attending.

Obama did that too, come to think of it.
 
Back
Top