Obama is to leadership like Jeffrey Dahmer is to cooking

[NeverEndingMe]

yes! think we can all agree

 

[rippitydoo]

yes! think we can all agree

We can indeed all agree... That you know nothing about Obama or much of anything else. Otherwise, you would know enough to post your opinions (almost wrote "thoughts", but we know you don't have those) in one thread. There, you would then strongly & immediately get responses from the 98% of the Forums who are smarter than you (leaving out 2% for the cats I see on YouTube using keyboards) until someone on staff removed the threads & you from the Forums.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

We can indeed all agree... That you know nothing about Obama or much of anything else. Otherwise, you would know enough to post your opinions (almost wrote "thoughts", but we know you don't have those) in one thread. There, you would then strongly & immediately get responses from the 98% of the Forums who are smarter than you (leaving out 2% for the cats I see on YouTube using keyboards) until someone on staff removed the threads & you from the Forums.

still wanting to be a obama slave, how sad

you are proof, that being poor is a choice

 

[Busybody]

We can indeed all agree... That you know nothing about Obama or much of anything else. Otherwise, you would know enough to post your opinions (almost wrote "thoughts", but we know you don't have those) in one thread. There, you would then strongly & immediately get responses from the 98% of the Forums who are smarter than you (leaving out 2% for the cats I see on YouTube using keyboards) until someone on staff removed the threads & you from the Forums.

loonatic

 

[rippitydoo]

still wanting to be a obama slave, how sad

you are proof, that being poor is a choice

I have never been a slave to anyone, nor had the desire to be one.

You remain proof that being against Obama is a poor choice, which those who made it try to cover by attacking those who made the right decision in the first place.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

I have never been a slave to anyone, nor had the desire to be one.

You remain proof that being against Obama is a poor choice, which those who made it try to cover by attacking those who made the right decision in the first place.

obama is a fuck up


you are a slave

 

[rippitydoo]

obama is a fuck up


you are a slave

You are wrong on both of those.

However, rethinking a bit (impossible for you, who haven't even though this out once), maybe Obama is like Dahmer was as a cook; Jeffrey must've cooked OK, or nobody would've ate it.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

You are wrong on both of those.

However, rethinking a bit (impossible for you, who haven't even though this out once), maybe Obama is like Dahmer was as a cook; Jeffrey must've cooked OK, or nobody would've ate it.

wow, you are a total fuck up

 

[rippitydoo]

wow, you are a total fuck up

That should be sent to yourself, perhaps in PM... Not posted where everyone can read it, since we all knew it about you days ago.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Years from now, The Big O will be adjudged the worst president in modern history.

 

[rippitydoo]

Years from now, The Big O will be adjudged the worst president in modern history.

Impossible when he's not even the worst this millennia.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Impossible when he's not even the worst this millennia.

It's way too early to judge that.

 

[literalwife]

How original of you, another Anti Obama post.

 

[Boxlicker101]

How original of you, another Anti Obama post.

Not just a post; the whole thread is anti-Obama. He is so inept it's easy to say bad things about him.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

How original of you, another Anti Obama post.

well obama is a fuck up. do you support the obama?

 

[rippitydoo]

It's way too early to judge that.

No it isn't... Whether you believe the new millennia started in 2000 or 2001, "Dubya" was certainly in this millennia. He was just-as-certainly worse than Obama, so that negates any possibility Obama was the worst of this millennia.

 

[Boxlicker101]

No it isn't... Whether you believe the new millennia started in 2000 or 2001, "Dubya" was certainly in this millennia. He was just-as-certainly worse than Obama, so that negates any possibility Obama was the worst of this millennia.

The Big O is the third POTUS of the current millennium. The total costs and losses resulting from his mismanagement are not known yet. I predict Obama will be adjudged much worse than W is and was. However, it is still too early to tell

 

[rippitydoo]

The Big O is the third POTUS of the current millennium. The total costs and losses resulting from his mismanagement are not known yet. I predict Obama will be adjudged much worse than W is and was. However, it is still too early to tell

I know Obama & Dubya, but they are the only Presidents of this millennia I can recall.

Also, even with this much of his second term to go, Obama can't possibly be worse than Dubya, & anyone who "judges" him so is doing so based mainly on some prejudice that has nothing to do with either man.

 

[ElleryQueen]

I know Obama & Dubya, but they are the only Presidents of this millennia I can recall.

Then you were probably born around January 21, 1998, given that memories usually develop after age 3 and that most people who reach adulthood who know "millennia" is a plural word and wouldn't use it in place of the singular "millennium". Bill Clinton was an acting President until January 20, 2001, the same day George W. Bush would be inaugurated. This makes the chain of Presidents for this century and millennium:

Bill Clinton
George W. Bush
Barack Obama

Given that Clinton actually worked to fix the economy - so much so his two terms decreased the public debt and netted a surplus (even if it wasn't enough to cancel out the full public debt and actually increased the gross federal debt) - and his largest problems were Lewinsky, Pardongate, and his fiscal responsibility was bad (read: he wasn't a penny pincher when funding government programs), he'll probably continue to be viewed favorably for years.

It'll come down to the man who misused Clinton's surplus or the man who's chosen to let the former man's problems fester.

Also, even with this much of his second term to go, Obama can't possibly be worse than Dubya

Want to bet? His main priority is continuing the legacy of George W. Bush. And truthfully, with how much you defend Obama, I'm amazed you haven't played the one card that all Obama supporters use in hopes of disproving this. Perhaps you know what I'll issue in response to that card and prove the "could" is really a "won't"?

& anyone who "judges" him so is doing so based mainly on some prejudice that has nothing to do with either man.

The keyword there is "mainly", which means there are valid reasons to judge Obama as worse than Bush. Interesting then that you chose to play the bigotry card in the same utterance of this admission that valid reasons exist.

 

[rippitydoo]

Then you were probably born around January 21, 1998, given that memories usually develop after age 3 and that most people who reach adulthood who know "millennia" is a plural word and wouldn't use it in place of the singular "millennium". Bill Clinton was an acting President until January 20, 2001, the same day George W. Bush would be inaugurated. This makes the chain of Presidents for this century and millennium:

Bill Clinton
George W. Bush
Barack Obama...

It'll come down to the man who misused Clinton's surplus or the man who's chosen to let the former man's problems fester.

Actually, I was born before either Bush occupied the Oval Office... Regardless, it matters not; Being we both agree George W. Bush & Obama are both/each included in the list, that is enough to keep Obama from being the worst.

Want to bet? His main priority is continuing the legacy of George W. Bush.

Being you've more than proven to have a working brain of your own, I highly doubt you have any ability to read Obama's brain. Ergo, while you may have a million ideas what it "appears to be", you have no idea what Obama's main priority actually is. Also (as I believe other posters in this thread have agreed with me already), no matter if he wanted to or not, it was impossible from Day 1 of his administration for Obama to completely clean-up the mess(es) George W. Bush had created.

And truthfully, with how much you defend Obama, I'm amazed you haven't played the one card that all Obama supporters use in hopes of disproving this. Perhaps you know what I'll issue in response to that card and prove the "could" is really a "won't"?

Yeah; Nothing. If I don't/haven't "played" the "card", there is no point in responding to it. Then again, you've already tried to refute George W. Bush being a worse President than Obama, which is something many would know to be impossible, so your next reply may very well include responses to claims Barack is a female, or a thousand other things I've have-&-will never say/said.

The keyword there is "mainly", which means there are valid reasons to judge Obama as worse than Bush. Interesting then that you chose to play the bigotry card in the same utterance of this admission that valid reasons exist.

Once again, you are wrong. The key word there is "mainly", but that is because I only used it because (unlike some other posters I have responded to/been responded-to by here), I am open to expressing the possibility that what I say is not 100% true or false. The facts are no valid reasons exist now or in 5 years to judge Obama's Presidency as worse then Bush's, the same as there is no bigotry in my statements.

 

[Asstronaut]

obama is a fuck up


you are a slave

/pol/ pls go

 

[NeverEndingMe]

/pol/ pls go

clearly you are not an America, please get the fuck out

 

[rippitydoo]

clearly you are not an America, please get the fuck out

No they're not, as I don't see a way one person can be a whole country (except maybe the Pope in the Vatican).

However, yours is not the popular opinion, so you are the one who needs to GTFO.

 

[Sonichu]

No they're not, as I don't see a way one person can be a whole country (except maybe the Pope in the Vatican).

However, yours is not the popular opinion, so you are the one who needs to GTFO.

What about the president in DC?

 

[rippitydoo]

What about the president in DC?

Can you not DC what is wrong with that question?!

1] It's "DC" because it's a "District"... Not a city or state, let alone a country.

2] As I believe has already been posted in this thread, the President has Congress (among others) affecting his decisions/actions & the way they are expressed to the people.