Obama’s liberalism paved the way for Donald Trump

[FakeNews]

It was Obamaism, more than Clintonism or Pelosism, that elected Donald Trump and gave the GOP both houses of Congress. The former president’s coercive liberalism at home and appeasement abroad led to the greatest upset in American politics.

His two biggest achievements, ObamaCare and the Iran nuclear deal, were sold on the backs of lies. President Trump is Obama’s legacy.

And now Dear Leader wants to “help” Dems again. Let’s see how many Clinton and Pelosi critics have the courage to tell him, “No, thanks, you’ve done enough.”

Obama’s desire to re-litigate his tenure comes amid other signs that the siege of the Trump White House is lifting and the political momentum is shifting.

Suddenly, Dems are the fighting, fractured party with no agenda or leader while Republicans finally show signs of uniting their majorities to get big things done.

http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/obamas-liberalism-paved-the-way-for-donald-trump/

 

[spacekowboy]

Latent racism played a bigger part.

 

[Ramone45]

Latent racism played a bigger part.

No, it didn't.

 

[water505]

Latent racism played a bigger part.

That's so fucking stupid. Prove it.

 

[FakeNews]

Latent racism played a bigger part.

Are you calling Trump supporters racists?

 

[Whann]

I like the way you guys still blame everything bad on Obama.

 

[water505]

Are you calling Trump supporters racists?

Who is this assclown?

 

[Whann]

Who is this assclown?

It's another bert alt.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I like the way you guys still blame everything bad on Obama.

Some people still blame everything bad on W.

 

[magicalmoments]

That's so fucking stupid. Prove it.

Just reading the racists posts you and your ilk keep putting up is a fair level of proof.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Latent racism played a bigger part.

Uhhh...



Is this the only card you guys ever play?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Just reading the racists posts you and your ilk keep putting up is a fair level of proof.

Why don't you offer some examples of what you consider to be the ilk's racist posts...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

In the absence of great ideas and passion, the left congeals around tired ideas of the past. Liberals resort to socialist class struggle narratives that have long grown old and irrelevant. The fragility of these ideas makes them brittle to the point that they would seem to break if opposed and compromised. Safety lies in not changing, and just repeating slogans of the past.

This explains the liberals’ stubborn attachment to political correctness that has so isolated itself from common sense and reality. It explains their willingness to suppress opposition even by sacrificing freedom of expression on university campuses. That is why the new liberals avoid debate and set themselves up as commissars to condemn those who oppose them on feminism, abortion, same-sex “marriage,” or global warming.

They know that all this causes intense polarization. However, the left lives upon this polarization. They only survive by hardening in their positions. It has reached a point where the more radical core does not wish to live in consensus with the right. It realizes that the minute it reaches a consensus, it is lost.

Thus, to advance, the left is restricted to looking to the right. Indeed, the only way the left can be saved is by exaggerating or distorting the right’s positions. It exploits any vulnerable point that might further liberal orthodoxy. It calls for media to create firestorms around minor issues that hide its weaknesses. The left creates myths about itself to make it seem more powerful than it is.

John Horvatt II, Liberals are in Trouble - and They Know it


http://www.americanthinker.com/arti..._trouble__and_they_know_it.html#ixzz4lrDFYWTc