NY Times busted again for fake news - by the NE Patriots

Did President Trump tell you that?

Here's a better question. Why would President Trump allow such a picture to be taken, when a picture is freely available of the past event showing a much larger crowd?
 
I read about this earlier. Kind of funny that the Pats did the correcting. Too bad Hernandez couldn't make it.
 
Fake News?

You would think the WH would be correcting the situation and not the Pats. Looks like another blow job by the WH and Der Fuehrer.
 
What an idiotic thread. The NYT thoroughly apologised for their error. To my knowledge, the hero of the person who started this thread has never ever apologised for his many lies, half-truths, misstatements, and poor judgments.
 
What an idiotic thread. The NYT thoroughly apologised for their error. To my knowledge, the hero of the person who started this thread has never ever apologised for his many lies, half-truths, misstatements, and poor judgments.

Lunatic
 
Did President Trump tell you that?

Here's a better question. Why would President Trump allow such a picture to be taken, when a picture is freely available of the past event showing a much larger crowd?

Here's a much better question: aren't you tired of being stupid?
 
What an idiotic thread. The NYT thoroughly apologised for their error. To my knowledge, the hero of the person who started this thread has never ever apologised for his many lies, half-truths, misstatements, and poor judgments.

So idiotic that you were compelled to post in it. Gotcha.

And what evidence do you have to support your asinine claim that Trump is my "hero."
 
I love how leftists dismiss the media's persistent lies and incompetence...the same way they dismissed Barry's. It's their new normal.
 
I love how leftists dismiss the media's persistent lies and incompetence...the same way they dismissed Barry's. It's their new normal.
The press releases directly from the White House are filled with factual, spelling and grammatical errors. That is the new normal.
 
Whether they apologized or not is irrelevant. The idiotic thing to me is that a.) some reporter thought it was a news story b.) some fact-checker didn't and c.) some editor thought it was a good idea.

It's symptomatic of the problem large segments of the media have - they're so bubbled common sense has long since left the house.
 
Just when you think they've hit rock bottom...

Yet they never let it bother them. Just like liberals or Democrats in general. That's one thing you have to give them credit for. They get humiliated, make fools of themselves, repeatedly lose elections, whatever, and they just keep coming back like nothing's happened. Republicans are so afraid of losing they jump at their own shadows and run away from anything they supposedly stand for at the first sign of defeat. Have to give the liberals credit for their arrogant resiliance.
 
I can't imagine why this was even posted in the first place. What was the point other than to make Trump look bad.
Cheap shot.
 
So, the question is, why did the Times not do its due diligence?

;)


Is it because the story as reported fitted their preconceived template for reporting on Abu Ivanka al-Amriki?

Has the Times gotten so lazy/political that it does less sourcing and fact-checking than the National Enquirer?
 
Back
Top