Nothing's going to stop that madman now...

p_p_man

The 'Euro' European
Joined
Feb 18, 2001
Posts
24,253
Even if Saddam says they have no further areas the inspectors can visit and the inspectors agree, it will be up to George to decide whether they're telling the truth...

Do you think Saddam will strike first on the grounds that if he's going to get hammered he may as well get hammered for a reason?

ppman
 
p_p_man said:
Even if Saddam says they have no further areas the inspectors can visit and the inspectors agree, it will be up to George to decide whether they're telling the truth...

Do you think Saddam will strike first on the grounds that if he's going to get hammered he may as well get hammered for a reason?

ppman

Speaking of hammered, how many drinks have you had so far today?
 
Re: Re: Nothing's going to stop that madman now...

Unregistered said:
Speaking of hammered, how many drinks have you had so far today?

That's 'smashed' not 'hammered'...

Know your terminology...

:p

ppman
 
Frankly, from the latest intelligence reports, I think there will be a first strike coming from Iraq's collusion with other muslim terrorists ... and, I'm quite sure you've read in your local press, they are aimed at a wide range of targets (including where you sit, PeePee).

Hopefully, you won't be quite so doubtful of evil when they do.
 
Re: Re: Re: Nothing's going to stop that madman now...

p_p_man said:
That's 'smashed' not 'hammered'...

Know your terminology...

:p

ppman

Hammered is acceptable in that context.

Quit playing God.
 
I am for one at a loss at how a goverment can decide that if a country is developing weapons of mass destruction should be stop. Considering that the United States, Russia, France, and China all have Nuclear and bio-chemical weapons.

I believe that any country that has Nuclear or bio-chemical weapons should be made to lose them and if they do not comply with the appointment, all trade, funding, and assistance going to or from the country should end.

No one country, no matter who they are should have such weapons, for they are not a deter to any other country to stop making them, but an encouragement to try and become on the same level of power.

Here people think we live in a world of diplomacy, where problems can be solved with negotiation. Yet, it seems that no matter what the goverments try, it always seems to come to the point of who has the biggest gun.
 
Re: Re: Re: Nothing's going to stop that madman now...

p_p_man said:
That's 'smashed' not 'hammered'...

Know your terminology...

:p

ppman


He was trying to be polite sweetpea.

He could have said "shitfaced"


;)
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nothing's going to stop that madman now...

*goddess*emi* said:
He was trying to be polite sweetpea.

He could have said "shitfaced"


;)

and that's 'shit arsed'...

ahh the joys of booze speak...

:D

ppman
 
Hanns_Schmidt said:
I am for one at a loss at how a goverment can decide that if a country is developing weapons of mass
destruction should be stop. Considering that the United States, Russia, France, and China all have Nuclear and
bio-chemical weapons.

===================

I guess it might have a little to do with Iraq having invaded Kuwait.

Gassed 5000+ people and more dead from disease

Attempted to invade Iran.

Use chemical weapons against Iraninan troops


Attempted to invade Saudi Arabia


Killed 1000's of shits and kurds in the North


Fired missiles at Israel, Saudi, Kuwait, Iran and Northern Iraqi towns


Has opressed, murdered and imprisoned 1000's of it's own people.


Has funded terrorism abroad


Had exported terrorism


Has incited hate and terrorism





How is that for starters?

Bit like America really...

Killing off the indiginous population

Enslaving others

Invading countries

Developing weapons of mass destruction

Crushing any political opposition by home grown assasinations

Has incited terrorism and hatred

Has plotted the downfall of foreign governments

Has interefered with the internal workings of most countries on the planet...

How's that for enders?

ppman
 
p_p_man said:
Bit like America really...

Killing off the indiginous population

Enslaving others

Invading countries

Developing weapons of mass destruction

Crushing any political opposition by home grown assasinations

Has incited terrorism and hatred

Has plotted the downfall of foreign governments

Has interefered with the internal workings of most countries on the planet...

How's that for enders?

ppman

A map for the operations of:










19th century Britain!!!!
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nothing's going to stop that madman now...

p_p_man said:
and that's 'shit arsed'...

ahh the joys of booze speak...

:D

ppman


Here in the cunting, Republican warmongering, fucking...etc. etc.
U.S.A., a Shitass (or arse if you prefer) is a jerk in need of a drink, and Shitfaced is the same Shitass after a fifth of tequila

:D :kiss:
 
Hanns_Schmidt you make excellent points of references, but as you see so does p_p_man.

The human species is to war like, we need to find better ways.
 
p_p_man said:
Even if Saddam says they have no further areas the inspectors can visit and the inspectors agree, it will be up to George to decide whether they're telling the truth...

Do you think Saddam will strike first on the grounds that if he's going to get hammered he may as well get hammered for a reason?

ppman

He has 45 days to dispose or otherwise hide anything he wants. So we should believe this madman?

You are so fucking nuts, this is really stupid of me to even be posting here.
 
p_p_man has got ÂŁ50 sterling and is headed for the pubs . . .

For Christ's sake, people, get out of his cunting way! . . .

TB4p
 
p_p_man said:
Even if Saddam says they have no further areas the inspectors can visit and the inspectors agree, it will be up to George to decide whether they're telling the truth...

Do you think Saddam will strike first on the grounds that if he's going to get hammered he may as well get hammered for a reason?

ppman

You still don't get it. It's not up to Saddam to decide. That part is fairly simple for most people to understand.
 
The funny thing is that when I read the topic of this thread, I read it is "nothing's gonna change my love for you..." . Remember that really bad Rick Astley song?
 
Harry_Rabbit said:
The funny thing is that when I read the topic of this thread, I read it is "nothing's gonna change my love for you..." . Remember that really bad Rick Astley song?
take another pill HR
 
Re: Re: Nothing's going to stop that madman now...

A Desert Rose said:
He has 45 days to dispose or otherwise hide anything he wants. So we should believe this madman?

You are so fucking nuts, this is really stupid of me to even be posting here.

The madman I'm referring to is George...

ppman
 
Madman George died a long time ago, sweetie. Took the whole Stewart line with him, didn't he?
 
Back
Top