renard_ruse
Break up Amazon
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2007
- Posts
- 16,094
Not enough censorship on Twitter?
- Thread starter renard_ruse
- Start date
renard_ruse
Break up Amazon
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2007
- Posts
- 16,094
These foul mouth, immoral entertainment perverts who corrupt our children with their disgusting for profit filth are now demanding censorship of political and intellectual free speech even more than we already have now.
And somehow political censorship is being done in the alleged name of "defending democracy."
When does the public finally open its eyes to what's happening? Or are they simply too brainwashed and lost already?
And somehow political censorship is being done in the alleged name of "defending democracy."
When does the public finally open its eyes to what's happening? Or are they simply too brainwashed and lost already?
renard_ruse
Break up Amazon
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2007
- Posts
- 16,094
There was an interesting discussion on another board yesterday about where this discrimination and repression ultimately leads. Its not just speech censorship but even economic discrimination such as denial of the right to bank or use financial services with large corporations for example.
Overtime this is how pilarized societies and even new ethnic communities develop. Those marginalized need basic services. Someone either within the marginalized group or outside of it will eventually fill in the void and offer the denied services to the marginalized population. If the situation persists long enough a separate set of institutions develops organically. Then those forced to use the separate institutions increasingly start becoming a separate community within the society. Over a few generations they may develop into a distinct ethno-cultural community that passes on its institutions to its offspring and so on.
This may ultimately be a good thing as mainstream America is already lost for more conservative and traditional populations, either now or in a few years. A parallel community makes sense as the best peaceful alternative for dissenters. Having it forced on them and developing organically in response is actually the least difficult path to an alternative set of institutions though it will be painful and there will be hard times along the way, including blacklistings, persecutions, and physical attacks against the new marginalized group.
Overtime this is how pilarized societies and even new ethnic communities develop. Those marginalized need basic services. Someone either within the marginalized group or outside of it will eventually fill in the void and offer the denied services to the marginalized population. If the situation persists long enough a separate set of institutions develops organically. Then those forced to use the separate institutions increasingly start becoming a separate community within the society. Over a few generations they may develop into a distinct ethno-cultural community that passes on its institutions to its offspring and so on.
This may ultimately be a good thing as mainstream America is already lost for more conservative and traditional populations, either now or in a few years. A parallel community makes sense as the best peaceful alternative for dissenters. Having it forced on them and developing organically in response is actually the least difficult path to an alternative set of institutions though it will be painful and there will be hard times along the way, including blacklistings, persecutions, and physical attacks against the new marginalized group.
There is a difference between censoring "Conservatives" and censoring radical violent extremists. The latter do pose a danger to democracy, liberty and economic and social well-being and there is certainly a justification in de-platforming them as "hate speech." Then these same groups claim "Censorship" when their platforms get taken away. I'll pose a question: Would you be okay for censoring and de-platforming Antifa members posting their violent anarchist crap on social media? Of course you would, for the same reasons stated above. So would I.
Also, keep in mind that there are many foreign powers using social media to influence and undermine the American democratic process- both on social media and lo and behold- right (guide) here on this very board. Totally understandable that the owners of these social media platforms would want that stuff blocked. Speaking of rightguide, the original poster is one and the same, I am guessing...
Also, keep in mind that there are many foreign powers using social media to influence and undermine the American democratic process- both on social media and lo and behold- right (guide) here on this very board. Totally understandable that the owners of these social media platforms would want that stuff blocked. Speaking of rightguide, the original poster is one and the same, I am guessing...
Tryharder62
Keep Believing
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Posts
- 12,752
Oh my gosh, that is really a sacrifice for them to give up their accounts for 24 hours.
How will they ever manage?
How will they ever manage?
I'll interpret RacistGuy's oppressed white male victimhood rant for you.
"They won't just cater to us because we're white men anymore."
SAD!!!
Trump_Virus
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2020
- Posts
- 131
You elected a foul mouthed entertainment pervert to office in 2016, so shut you pie hole, retard ruse. He is also calling for censorship.
Exactly. The president (and many others on this board INCLUDING RETARD RUSE HIMSELF) have actively stated that any news media or journalists that say disparaging things about the president, or present proven and verifiable facts that make his policies look counterproductive, ought to be censored or worse, arrested. Because unless it is presenting the president in a positive light, it is "Fake News."
That is calling for censorship.
And they whine when one of their own controversial and inflammatory posts get taken down?
Similar threads
