J
Selena_Kitt
Disappearing
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
- Posts
- 12,336
Sixteen is the age of consent in the UK, correct?
Ethically, not a good idea. But legally? It's actually accurate. No one should be put on a sex offender list because they had sex with someone at or over that country's age of consent.
Ethically, not a good idea. But legally? It's actually accurate. No one should be put on a sex offender list because they had sex with someone at or over that country's age of consent.
dr_mabeuse
seduce the mind
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2002
- Posts
- 11,528
What's the problem here? They're talking about sex with someone 18 or older? Why should they be prosecuted?
Edited to add: Ah, the age of consent is 16? Mmm. That changes things...
(For those who hate links without summaries, as I do, the link is to an article in Fox News about the head of a British teachers' union who created a stir by suggesting that teachers who have sex with their underage students not be prosecuted.)
Edited to add: Ah, the age of consent is 16? Mmm. That changes things...
(For those who hate links without summaries, as I do, the link is to an article in Fox News about the head of a British teachers' union who created a stir by suggesting that teachers who have sex with their underage students not be prosecuted.)
Last edited:
Similar threads
