New York clergy charged for marrying gay couples

Queersetti

Bastardo Suave
Joined
Apr 10, 2003
Posts
37,288
New York clergy charged for marrying gay couples

By Michael Hill, Associated Press, 3/15/2004


KINGSTON, N.Y. -- Two Unitarian Universalist ministers were charged Monday for marrying 13 same-sex couples, thrusting the clergy into the legal battle over gay marriage in New York.

The charges against Kay Greenleaf and Dawn Sangrey may be the first brought against clergy for performing same-sex unions, according to the Human Rights Campaign, a Washington, D.C.-based gay and lesbian rights group.

Greenleaf and Sangrey were charged with multiple counts of solemnizing a marriage without a license, the same charges leveled against New Paltz Mayor Jason West who last month drew the state into the widening national debate over same-sex unions.

Greenleaf, who acknowledged performing the ceremonies knowing the couples did not have licenses, said she signed an affidavit for the couples and considers the ceremonies civil.

In a prepared statement, Ulster County District Attorney Donald Williams said the law makes no distinction between public official and member of the clergy who preside over wedding ceremonies.

Williams said he decided to press charges now because the New Paltz marriages were "drastically different" from religious ceremonies because Greenleaf and Sangrey publicly said they considered them civil. Some Unitarian ministers, Greenleaf included, have been performing ceremonies for gay couples since before the issue erupted onto the national stage.

"It is not our intention to interfere with anyone's right to express their religious beliefs, including the right of members of the clergy to perform ceremonies where couples are united solely in the eyes of the church or any other faith," Williams said.

"As far as I know that's unprecedented," said Mark Shields a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign. "It's ridiculous that prosecutors would spend their time charging anyone with a crime who is simply trying to unite two people with basic rights and protections."

The pair performed the weddings March 6.

On Saturday, Greenleaf and Sangrey were joined by a third minister, the Rev. Marion Visel, in performing 25 more ceremonies, which went off without protests or arrests. It could not immediately be learned if more charges would be brought.

The ministers' lawyer, Robert Gottlieb, was unaware of the charges when contacted by The Associated Press and declined immediate comment.

Since West joined San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom as the only elected officials to marry gay couples, the issue has spread rapidly across the country. Courts, legislatures and elected officials are wrestling with what supporters say is a matter of civil rights and opponents call an attack on the time-honored institution of marriage.

West married 25 gay and lesbian couples Feb. 27 in a highly publicized marathon ceremony. West is now under a court order temporarily halting the weddings. West faces 19 misdemeanor counts for solemnizing marriages without a license.

The charges carry a fine of $25 to $500 or jail time.

Williams said before Monday's charges were handed down it would be more difficult considering charges against clergy as opposed to an elected official because the clergy had not sworn to uphold the law. He said his decision to press charges was influenced by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's opinion that gay marriage is illegal in New York and by the injunction issued by a state supreme court justice against West.
 
Queersetti said:
New York clergy charged for marrying gay couples

By Michael Hill, Associated Press, 3/15/2004


KINGSTON, N.Y. -- Two Unitarian Universalist ministers were charged Monday for marrying 13 same-sex couples, thrusting the clergy into the legal battle over gay marriage in New York.

"Thrusting the clergy..." hehe "thrusting" hehe...

Ahem, carry on.
 
Mikalya said:
What are they going to do next charge gay couples that handfast shesh.


If they get away with this, I don't see what would stop them.

What does "solemnize" really mean? It seems that any sort of ritual or ceremony could come under the scrutiny of the law. But I actually see this as a positive development, in a way. It destroys the argument that some opponents of same-sex marriage use, that allowing gays to enter into matrimony in some way impinges on the freedom of religion of those who don't believe in it. If the government can criminally charge clergy for presiding over one particular ceremony, it can criminalize others as well.
 
Back
Top