Necrophilia

[fenda]

if a person writes it in they,re will
that they want a good fuck in the afterlife
should it be legal

 

[catalina_francisco]

Let's see, I was thiniking about this a few days ago as I have often and I would like it were legal for francisco to fuck me if he wanted afterward, but don't think it would be his thing. That aside, by the time a will is read, you would likley be too far gone and/or buried or cremated so would be little point. Also if you didn't have anyone who was in your life, who do you suggest do it?

Catalina

 

[cati]

My two cents.

That's a rather heavy question.

Should necrophilia be legalized. I mean just "how illegal" is it anyway? If one does their own partner I mean? I don't think writing it in your will protect you from the legal repercussions should you be found out.

Why not take the time to get into the act before you call the coroner or ambulance... that is if your SO passes away at home. What if they die in the hospital, are you going to squeeze in a quick f***k before the nurse comes back?

This topic is way too kinky for me....

 

[FurryFury]

Interesting ideas.

*contemplates*

Fury

 

[Evil_Geoff]

Let me begin by saying the following disclaimer:

I am not an attorney, I do not practice law. THE FOLLOWING IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. This is my _opinion_ only.

Certainly you can request an "afterlife" quicky. It will NOT, however, indemnify whosoever tries to fulfill the request from the legal repercussions if they are caught. You can not issue a post-mortem "Get Out Of Jail Free" card. That would be akin to writing in your will "and I want my nephew Bob to rob the the Bank of London. Please be so kind as to let him do so."

You simply cannot "will" away the law.

Also keep in mind that if you were to put a clause in your will requesting that someone (or even giving a specific person permission to) engage in sexual acts with your corpse, that will probably give any other beneficiaries (if any), or even the state, grounds to contest the will, based on mental defect at the time the will was written.

You had bloody well be sure that your "i"s are dotted and your "t"s are crossed if you are seriously considering putting some thing like that in your will.

For more informed, professional information and guidance concerning what you can, and can not, get away with in a will in _YOUR_ jurisdiction, please consult an attorney familiar with estate planning who practices in your area.

YIK,
- Geoff

 

[O'Mac]

More a matter of health and safety

It's actually a fairly interesting question, one that I'll admit I never gave much thought to before. I'd say the reason necrophilia is illegal has to do a lot more with the hazards involved, and less then on being a simple social taboo. I mean, a lot of reactions occurr in the body immediately after death and prior to decomposition. Chemical reactions, bacterial growth, and a whole slew of other nasty business.

It's not just a simple matter of having an unmoving body to have your way with, it's actually a mass of rotting flesh and liquidfied tissue. The blood pools towards the extremities and creates a deformed look to the body, and the skin will start to detach itself from the muscles as well, so it would be a little hard to gain any purchase anywhere on the body.

Regardless of the will of the deceased requests, the risk of infection or hazardous chemical reaction is far too high to be done in any practical manner and would be overturned in any legal matter. More than likely, a person would be setting themself up for a psychiatric evaluation as well.

I'm gonna go out on a limb and just say:

Nercophilia - Probably not a good idea.

 

[Kajira Callista]

It's actually a fairly interesting question, one that I'll admit I never gave much thought to before. I'd say the reason necrophilia is illegal has to do a lot more with the hazards involved, and less then on being a simple social taboo. I mean, a lot of reactions occurr in the body immediately after death and prior to decomposition. Chemical reactions, bacterial growth, and a whole slew of other nasty business.

It's not just a simple matter of having an unmoving body to have your way with, it's actually a mass of rotting flesh and liquidfied tissue. The blood pools towards the extremities and creates a deformed look to the body, and the skin will start to detach itself from the muscles as well, so it would be a little hard to gain any purchase anywhere on the body.

Basically, the risk of infection or hazardous chemical reaction is far too high to be done in any practical manner, so I'm gonna go out on a limb and say:

Nercophilia - Probably not a good idea.

damn...you just ruined it for me *sigh*

 

[O'Mac]

Sorry, Kaj.

I suppose a person could always pleasure themselves with a thawed porkroast or chicken fillet. Probably the same sort of feeling.

 

[catalina_francisco]

It's actually a fairly interesting question, one that I'll admit I never gave much thought to before. I'd say the reason necrophilia is illegal has to do a lot more with the hazards involved, and less then on being a simple social taboo. I mean, a lot of reactions occurr in the body immediately after death and prior to decomposition. Chemical reactions, bacterial growth, and a whole slew of other nasty business.

It's not just a simple matter of having an unmoving body to have your way with, it's actually a mass of rotting flesh and liquidfied tissue. The blood pools towards the extremities and creates a deformed look to the body, and the skin will start to detach itself from the muscles as well, so it would be a little hard to gain any purchase anywhere on the body.

Regardless of the will of the deceased requests, the risk of infection or hazardous chemical reaction is far too high to be done in any practical manner and would be overturned in any legal matter. More than likely, a person would be setting themself up for a psychiatric evaluation as well.

I'm gonna go out on a limb and just say:

Nercophilia - Probably not a good idea.

LOL, I think some time would have to have passed before it got to that state...fresh and ripe it should be quite fuckable if you were so inclined and for me I could see it being a loving act, though I am not sure many would agree.

Catalina

 

[O'Mac]

Actually, the body really does start to breakdown immediately after death. I think I know what you mean though, Catalina.

Actually, let's split the difference in this instance. Say the special someone died in the act, and there was no chance for them to be resuscitated.

Would you......finish the job?

 

[leeroy jenkins]

Who woulda thought we might get some biology lessons on this page. This will never be legal in the States because we are still under some of that Puritan mindset, I don't think its any one thing but just the way that sex is viewed in the US. I did not see the Janet breastage on the Superbowl but look at what that did, its far reaching and long lasting effects are still being felt.

 

[Kajira Callista]

Actually, the body really does start to breakdown immediately after death. I think I know what you mean though, Catalina.

Actually, let's split the difference in this instance. Say the special someone died in the act, and there was no chance for them to be resuscitated.

Would you......finish the job?

heh...so that unruined it

 

[s'lara]

Some argue that necrophilia is a "victimless" crime. i don't quite see it that way, but if the intent is for sexual gratification because the victim is deceased and not as a final loving act (as mentioned by cat), i see it a bit as cold and self involved. Uninvolved in a way that is different than a Dominant using sub.

i guess the complete absence of personality, biological living presence and the total inability for the deceased to resist or join in the act is the turn on.

i don't think it should be legal. There are too many areas of opaqueness which could allow for those to commit the act through deception and with ill intent.

lara

 

[O'Mac]

i don't think it should be legal. There are too many areas of opaqueness which could allow for those to commit the act through deception and with ill intent.

lara

I'd agree with you as well concerning this particular grey area between personal freedoms and social responsibility.

 

[A_Kefka]

kinda funny on this topic, but the scene in clerks where the girlfriend comes out of the bathroom. it just came to mind looking at this.

 

[MechaBlade]

The act of necrophilia is legal in someplaces, I think, since Arnie just signed a law in 2004 declaring it illegal in CA.

It's actually a fairly interesting question, one that I'll admit I never gave much thought to before. I'd say the reason necrophilia is illegal has to do a lot more with the hazards involved, and less then on being a simple social taboo.

I'm going to go ahead and say it's illegal everywhere that it's illegal mainly because it grosses people out.

It doesn't hurt anybody, it's like having sex with a rock. I say it should be legal (as long as the person is unresuscitatable (brain dead for 30 mins or so).

 

[A_Kefka]

I think its not just that people think its gross. Its also an issue of respect for the dead. Many would consider it desecration for someone to molest their loved one's body. This of course wouldn't be an issue if they said in their will that they wanted it to happen, but I doubt they were thinking of that when the laws were written.

 

[shy slave]

Actually, the body really does start to breakdown immediately after death. I think I know what you mean though, Catalina.

Actually, let's split the difference in this instance. Say the special someone died in the act, and there was no chance for them to be resuscitated.

Would you......finish the job?

Honestly I imagine I would be too busy trying to resucitate him to even think about anything else. How do you know 'no chance' unless you try and keep trying untill the emeregency services arrive?

I don't see the appeal of necrophilia at all, if its with someone you loved and cared for the emotional responses engage quicker than the sexual ones.
As a generalisation I think most people would not think of sex but on the living person now lost.

If its a stranger, why bother, there are plently of people who are such a dull fuck that there is no need to take the health risks.

Although I have read that historically it was not uncommon for mortury attendants to see it as 'their right' with someone attractive.

 

[FurryFury]

I was married to someone who worked at a cemetery for a while. I thought it was just right up his alley to "diddle with the dead." but I never went to that much trouble to verify if he was.

Of course I just have these thoughts about all kinds of things.

Fury

 

[O'Mac]

Honestly I imagine I would be too busy trying to resucitate him to even think about anything else. How do you know 'no chance' unless you try and keep trying untill the emeregency services arrive?

It was mostly a tongue in cheek remark on my part. Would be kinda weird having a doctor in the bedroom for just such an occasion.

 

[MechaBlade]

Honestly I imagine I would be too busy trying to resucitate him to even think about anything else. How do you know 'no chance' unless you try and keep trying untill the emeregency services arrive?

After a few minutes of oxygen deprivation (when they stop breathing), the brain dies and the person cannot be resucitated.

I don't see the appeal of necrophilia at all, if its with someone you loved and cared for the emotional responses engage quicker than the sexual ones.
As a generalisation I think most people would not think of sex but on the living person now lost.

Some people view sex as a very emotional act. Sex can be a way of expressing your love for your partner (in this case, dead partner).

If its a stranger, why bother, there are plently of people who are such a dull fuck that there is no need to take the health risks.

Some people can't get laid.

 

[lne_iii]

kinda funny on this topic, but the scene in clerks where the girlfriend comes out of the bathroom. it just came to mind looking at this.

"I thought it was YOU!" ...hehe she really let him have it with that comment.
But in all seriousness, I don't see how anyone could actually contemplate necrophelia...it's gross.

 

[Etoile]

It only became illegal in California as recently as September 2004.

 

[Joe Schmoe]

I have had a couple of dead fucks in my time, though they would swear they were still alive and kicking. If this is what it is like then I would pass on the truly dead. I tend to like a little feedback when involved in sex with a partner. To me this would be nothing more than another form of masterbation in my book (of the dead).

 

[hotblooded]

Just a thought...

A dying wife says to her still loving and adoring kinkster husband, " Honey. I have never denied you any sexual experience. I know we/you've always wondered what it would feel like to have sex with a dead person, even tho' we'ed likely never do it in RL. We both know that it's a once in a lifetime experience (pun intended) and since I love you so much and want to please you always... even in the afterlife. I want to give you this final gift...of myself ".

Wife writes in her will, giving her husband permission. Even though she is no longer a living breathing woman, she is in fact still "his" and as one final loving gesture gives him the opportunity to have sex with her dead body, should he so desire it...shrugs.