Natural Vs. Cut

[LaJovena]

Okay, I didn't read all the posts because I was just itchin' to put in my .02.

My dh is natural. I'd had many lovers before him, all of them cut, and I quite honestly cannot tell the difference during sex. Maybe my pussy just isn't that sensitive, but I simply can't imagine being able to tell a difference.

Of course, when you're giving head and his cock is right there in your face, the difference is pretty fucking obvious, especially if he hasn't reached full erection. The foreskin covers his head. When erect, the head protrudes more, but the ridge around his glans isn't as obvious, because the foreskin obscures it.

At any rate, good sex with anybody relies on good communication. I don't think any man, cut or not, wants to be "man-handled." You just need to ask him what he likes. And then let him know that you enjoy pleasing him.

 

[littlebitshe]

I'm really shocked at how many guys on here are actually natural. I feel much more comfortable in trying it! I don't have children so I have not dealt with the circumsized/uncircumsized decision. I will definately be researching it before I do!

For now..... I'll give it a shot with a natural partner. And feel much more comfortable in doing so!!

 

[lindahotstuff]

I don't think there is much difference. With an uncut guy, the skin folds back once he is lubricated, and to me that is very similar to a cut guy. I think with oral I have to work on the guy a little more because the exposed bit of cock loes some sensitivity, whereas it's easier with an uncut guy to arouse him with my tongue. Once inside the Khyber Pass it all feels the same, more about girth than anything, but of course it's what they do with it that counts. Having said all that, if I had the pick of 2 guys with similar size cocks, I'd go with the cut one as it just looks a bit more erotic. Have fun with both and see how it goes.

 

[HockeyShark]

If you have the patience and dedication, you can try "foreskin restoration," which basically amounts to stretching the skin you do have to create a faux foreskin that covers and re-sensitizes the head.

There are whole sites and message boards that discuss how to do this.

Hmmmmmm, Interesting Idea..

 

[vlad2]

another 2 cents from an uncut guy.

.01) For the argument pull it back/don't pull it back. You need to be careful with some guys. Maybe for some it is naturally loose enough. As for myself I had to stretch it over the course of few sessions before it was comfortable. So yeah, don't just yank it.

As a funny note, I read someone's experience as a kid where the guy was curious, pulled it back and couldn't get it back. He ended up going to his mother, who then took him to a doctor to have it slightly cut so it would go back over the head.

.02) I don't know about cut guys, but personally I like being uncut because seems to me the head is much more sensitive since it is hidden most of the time. When I was younger it was so sensitive I couldn't even touch it directly. I would assume with cut guy, sensitivity goes away pretty fast because its just out there all the time. So I like my way

And yeah, now during sex, I can pull it back and it'll stay pulled back and you will not see a difference or I can leave it. Can cut guys do that?

 

[mjl2010]

Just out of curiosity....

I'm not trying to start an argument here, but I'd like to know the answer to this.

How does anyone know that an uncut guy is more sensitive than a cut guy?

It sounds as though an assumption is being made as to this. But if someone can make some sort of statement that this can be measured...I'd accept it. But I'd really like to know.

Anyone?

MJL

 

[necroerotica]

I'm not trying to start an argument here, but I'd like to know the answer to this.

How does anyone know that an uncut guy is more sensitive than a cut guy?

It sounds as though an assumption is being made as to this. But if someone can make some sort of statement that this can be measured...I'd accept it. But I'd really like to know.

Anyone?

MJL

The uncut - the penis head spends it's life snuggly covered in a warm, soft, envelope of skin.

The cut - the penis head spends it's life rubbing against underwear, jeans, panties, whatever, and naturally toughens/thickens to deal with that.

The uncut guys finds the rubbing against material INCREDIBLY uncomfortable/painful when it happens.

So, either the cut guy is just more used to dealing with discomfort, or his penis is less sensitive.

 

[mayadevi]

My non-American dh is uncut and sometimes when I am on top the angle is uncomfortable for him - it is better at a 45 degree angle rather than up and down - he has said that if I am just going up and down it pulls the foreskin too much.

I have been with both cut and uncut guys and it does seem to me like with uncut the head is more sensitive - that is just my experience of course... I will never forget the first time I licked the head of dh's cock - he looked like he was having some kind of divine vision.

 

[CynMarie]

I'm not trying to start an argument here, but I'd like to know the answer to this.

How does anyone know that an uncut guy is more sensitive than a cut guy?

It sounds as though an assumption is being made as to this. But if someone can make some sort of statement that this can be measured...I'd accept it. But I'd really like to know.

Anyone?

MJL

If you care to search, there are many sites where men had it done later in life due to societal pressure (US mainly I imagine) and regret it. Keep in mind that more is removed from babies than adults because there is no way to know how it will grow, they also end up removing frenulum, so guys cut as infants are likely to have more missing than guys cut as adults.

And really, how can removing THAT much skin and nerve endings not reduce some feeling?

If you want to watch a long boring documentary on the prepuce, it's functions, and the actual amount of skin removed: http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/video/prepuce.html

 

[gregor2001us]

I'm not trying to start an argument here, but I'd like to know the answer to this.

How does anyone know that an uncut guy is more sensitive than a cut guy?

It sounds as though an assumption is being made as to this. But if someone can make some sort of statement that this can be measured...I'd accept it. But I'd really like to know.

Anyone?

MJL

This is the wrong question to ask in my experience. I was cut as an infant. I am partially restored. Sensitivity is not a big issue, at least for me. Yes i am more sensitive, but if that were all, it would be no big deal.

It is the skin and its movement that makes the big difference. Hard to explain, but it feels pretty amazing. And it didn't feel that way until i had enough skin. And the extra skin is what makes intercourse feel so much better to my wife.

Cheers!

 

[littlebitshe]

If you want to watch a long boring documentary on the prepuce, it's functions, and the actual amount of skin removed: http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/video/prepuce.html

Interesting clip.... well there were a few parts a fast forwarded through, but very informative! It showed and explained a lot of things that I didn't know about natural cocks.

Thanks!

 

[bushy_chrissy]

On the sensitivity issue...

Just to respond to some of the issues raised here...

I hope you have/had a wonderful experience with the natural lover. I for one MUCH prefer the feeling of a penis that isn't missing any parts. Much more enjoyable sensations for me as the recipient, and I find that the uncut/intact penis doesn't pull moisture out of me the way a circumcised penis does.

It was mentioned above that the natural tip is encased by a 'soft envelope of skin.' Here's an example of some of the differences:

http://www.circumstitions.com/Restric/Images/Comparison/glans-i-c.jpg